IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v35y2021i11d10.1007_s11269-021-02935-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Approach for Determination of the Drainage Network Effect on GIUH Using Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets

Author

Listed:
  • Hüseyin Akay

    (Gazi University)

  • Müsteyde Baduna Koçyiğit

    (Gazi University)

Abstract

Digital elevation models (DEMs) enable extraction of stream networks, delineation of watersheds and determination of geomorphological characteristics. A widely used method for stream network extraction is to specify a threshold area required to initiate a channel. This is achieved by applying a threshold area value (As) in GIS software which displays the accumulated flow to each cell. In this study, the effect of the assigned As on the direct runoff hydrographs was analyzed. Of using different threshold values varying in a wide range, stream network extraction and watershed delineation were performed, and then stream orders, main channel lengths and related morphometric parameters were computed. The geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH) theory was adopted to obtain the hydrological response of the watershed and three direct runoff hydrographs were considered for validation. Statistical parameters and cumulative density functions of both observed and simulated hydrographs were computed and uncertainty analysis was performed. The best performing value of As with respect to the stream order and main channel length was determined using hesitant probabilistic fuzzy linguistic sets for different runoff hydrographs and criteria considered. It was found that the As value affected the stream order as expected and a stream order of maximum 3 was adequate for estimation of the runoff hydrograph with acceptable accuracy without unreasonably increasing the computational effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Hüseyin Akay & Müsteyde Baduna Koçyiğit, 2021. "An Approach for Determination of the Drainage Network Effect on GIUH Using Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(11), pages 3873-3902, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:35:y:2021:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-021-02935-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-021-02935-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-021-02935-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-021-02935-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dheeraj Kumar Joshi & Ismat Beg & Sanjay Kumar, 2018. "Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets with Applications in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Manish Kumar Goyal & Venkatesh K. Panchariya & Ashutosh Sharma & Vishal Singh, 2018. "Comparative Assessment of SWAT Model Performance in two Distinct Catchments under Various DEM Scenarios of Varying Resolution, Sources and Resampling Methods," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(2), pages 805-825, January.
    3. Shirin Karimi & Bahman Jabbarian Amiri & Arash Malekian, 2019. "Similarity Metrics-Based Uncertainty Analysis of River Water Quality Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(6), pages 1927-1945, April.
    4. Zeshui Xu & Wei Zhou, 2017. "Consensus building with a group of decision makers under the hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environment," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 481-503, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hüseyin Akay, 2022. "Towards Linking the Sustainable Development Goals and a Novel-Proposed Snow Avalanche Susceptibility Mapping," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(15), pages 6205-6222, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harish Garg & Gagandeep Kaur, 2018. "Algorithm for Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Based on Aggregation Operators with New Distance Measures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-30, November.
    2. Dheeraj Kumar Joshi & Ismat Beg & Sanjay Kumar, 2018. "Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets with Applications in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Hongyue Diao & Ansheng Deng & Hui Cui & Xin Liu & Li Zou, 2022. "An approach for solving fuzzy multi-criteria decision problem under linguistic information," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 45-69, March.
    4. Mohammad Ehteram & Ali Najah Ahmed & Chow Ming Fai & Haitham Abdulmohsin Afan & Ahmed El-Shafie, 2019. "Accuracy Enhancement for Zone Mapping of a Solar Radiation Forecasting Based Multi-Objective Model for Better Management of the Generation of Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Qasim Noor & Tabasam Rashid & Syed Muhammad Husnine, 2021. "An extended TDM method under probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environment for stock selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Shizhou Ma & Karen F. Beazley & Patrick Nussey & Christopher S. Greene, 2021. "Assessing Optimal Digital Elevation Model Selection for Active River Area Delineation Across Broad Regions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(14), pages 4825-4840, November.
    7. Xiao-kang Wang & Sheng-hui Wang & Hong-yu Zhang & Jian-qiang Wang & Lin Li, 2021. "The Recommendation Method for Hotel Selection Under Traveller Preference Characteristics: A Cloud-Based Multi-Criteria Group Decision Support Model," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 1433-1469, December.
    8. Huiping Chen & Guiqiong Xu & Pingle Yang, 2019. "Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Approach Based on Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information Measures and Their Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Sarka Hoskova-Mayerova & Madeline Al Tahan & Bijan Davvaz, 2020. "Fuzzy Multi-Hypergroups," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Songtao Shao & Xiaohong Zhang, 2019. "Measures of Probabilistic Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and the Application in Reducing Unnecessary Evaluation Processes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Weiming Li & Jun Ye, 2022. "Group Decision-Making Problems Based on Mixed Aggregation Operations of Interval-Valued Fuzzy and Entropy Elements in Single- and Interval-Valued Fuzzy Environments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, March.
    12. M. G. Brikaa & Zhoushun Zheng & El-Saeed Ammar, 2020. "Resolving Indeterminacy Approach to Solve Multi-Criteria Zero-Sum Matrix Games with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Goals," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-30, February.
    13. Mou Leong Tan & Hilmi P. Ramli & Tze Huey Tam, 2018. "Effect of DEM Resolution, Source, Resampling Technique and Area Threshold on SWAT Outputs," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(14), pages 4591-4606, November.
    14. Alberto Martínez-Salvador & Carmelo Conesa-García, 2020. "Suitability of the SWAT Model for Simulating Water Discharge and Sediment Load in a Karst Watershed of the Semiarid Mediterranean Basin," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(2), pages 785-802, January.
    15. Zixue Guo & Sijia Liu, 2023. "Study on the Selection of Pharmaceutical E-Commerce Platform Considering Bounded Rationality under Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, April.
    16. Armita Khorsandi & Bing-Yuan Cao & Hadi Nasseri, 2019. "A New Method to Optimize the Satisfaction Level of the Decision Maker in Fuzzy Geometric Programming Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Harikrishna Sukumaran & Sanat Nalini Sahoo, 2020. "A Methodological Framework for Identification of Baseline Scenario and Assessing the Impact of DEM Scenarios on SWAT Model Outputs," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(15), pages 4795-4814, December.
    18. Jingyu Li & Yangbo Chen & Yanzheng Zhu & Jun Liu, 2023. "Study of Flood Simulation in Small and Medium-Sized Basins Based on the Liuxihe Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Huijuan Wang & Xin Wang & Lidong Wang, 2019. "Multicriteria Decision Making Based on Archimedean Bonferroni Mean Operators of Hesitant Fermatean 2-Tuple Linguistic Terms," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:35:y:2021:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-021-02935-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.