IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/telsys/v64y2017i1d10.1007_s11235-016-0168-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Security assessment framework for IoT service

Author

Listed:
  • Keon Chul Park

    (Sungkyunkwan University)

  • Dong-Hee Shin

    (Sungkyunkwan University)

Abstract

What are the critical requirements to be considered for the security measures in Internet of Things (IoT) services? Further, how should those security resources be allocated? To provide valuable insight into these questions, this paper introduces a security assessment framework for the IoT service environment from an architectural perspective. Our proposed framework integrates fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy ANP to reflect dependence and feedback interrelations among security criteria and, ultimately, to weigh and prioritize them. The results, gleaned from the judgments of 38 security experts, revealed that security design should put more importance on the service layer, especially to ensure availability and trust. We believe that these results will contribute to the provision of more secure and reliable IoT services.

Suggested Citation

  • Keon Chul Park & Dong-Hee Shin, 2017. "Security assessment framework for IoT service," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 193-209, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:64:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11235-016-0168-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11235-016-0168-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11235-016-0168-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11235-016-0168-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    2. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2006. "Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-33987-0, March.
    3. Cheng, Ching-Hsue, 1997. "Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 343-350, January.
    4. Ertugrul Karsak, E. & Tolga, Ethem, 2001. "Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making procedure for evaluating advanced manufacturing system investments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 49-64, January.
    5. Thomas L. Saaty, 2006. "The Analytic Network Process," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, chapter 0, pages 1-26, Springer.
    6. Ernest H. Forman & Saul I. Gass, 2001. "The Analytic Hierarchy Process---An Exposition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 469-486, August.
    7. Shin, Dong-Hee, 2015. "Effect of the customer experience on satisfaction with smartphones: Assessing smart satisfaction index with partial least squares," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 627-641.
    8. Yeh, Tsu-Ming & Huang, Yu-Lang, 2014. "Factors in determining wind farm location: Integrating GQM, fuzzy DEMATEL, and ANP," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 159-169.
    9. Leung, L. C. & Cao, D., 2000. "On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 102-113, July.
    10. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan & M. Y. Qahtan & O. S. Albahri & A. S. Albahri & Mussab Alaa & F. M. Jumaah & Mohammed Talal & K. L. Tan & W. L. Shir & C. K. Lim, 2018. "A survey on communication components for IoT-based technologies in smart homes," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Ikram Ullah & Munam Ali Shah & Abdul Wahid & Amjad Mehmood & Houbing Song, 2018. "ESOT: a new privacy model for preserving location privacy in Internet of Things," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 553-575, April.
    4. Mohammadzadeh, Ali Kamali & Ghafoori, Saeed & Mohammadian, Ayoub & Mohammadkazemi, Reza & Mahbanooei, Bahareh & Ghasemi, Rohollah, 2018. "A Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (FANP) approach for prioritizing internet of things challenges in Iran," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 124-134.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Ehsan Khanmohammadi & Maryam Azizi & HamidReza Talaie & Fatih Ecer & Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, 2024. "A novel hybrid decision-making framework based on modified fuzzy analytic network process and fuzzy best–worst method," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1-32, December.
    3. Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Laleh Katoueizadeh & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2020. "Risk identification and prioritization in banking projects of payment service provider companies: an empirical study," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Abbas Mardani & Ahmad Jusoh & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Zainab Khalifah, 2015. "Sustainable and Renewable Energy: An Overview of the Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques and Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-38, October.
    5. Alizadeh, Reza & Soltanisehat, Leili & Lund, Peter D. & Zamanisabzi, Hamed, 2020. "Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through a hybrid MCDM method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    6. Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit & Pongchanun Luangpaiboon, 2022. "An integrated FAHP–ZODP approach for strategic marketing information system project selection," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1792-1809, September.
    7. Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh & Kazim Topuz & Ali Dag & Asil Oztekin, 2019. "An AHP-IFT Integrated Model for Performance Evaluation of E-Commerce Web Sites," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1345-1355, December.
    8. Yu-Jie Wang, 2023. "Extending Quality Function Deployment and Analytic Hierarchy Process under Interval-Valued Fuzzy Environment for Evaluating Port Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Oliveira, Inês A.S.J. & Carayannis, Elias G. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Jalali, Marjan S. & Carlucci, Daniela & Ferreira, João J.M., 2018. "Constructing home safety indices for strategic planning in residential real estate: A socio-technical approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 67-77.
    10. Rezaei, Jafar & Ortt, Roland, 2013. "Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 75-84.
    11. Artur Amsharuk & Grażyna Łaska, 2022. "A Review: Existing Methods for Solving Spatial Planning Problems for Wind Turbines in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Zhü, Kèyù, 2014. "Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: Fallacy of the popular methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 209-217.
    13. Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebeci, Ufuk & Ruan, Da, 2004. "Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 171-184, January.
    14. Kiracı, Kasım & Akan, Ercan, 2020. "Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    15. Somsuk, Nisakorn & Laosirihongthong, Tritos, 2014. "A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators: Resource-based view," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 198-210.
    16. Roberto Castaneda & Pilar Arroyo & Lourdes Loza, 2020. "Assessing Countries Sustainability: A Group Multicriteria Decision Making Methodology Approach," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 174-174, July.
    17. Wolfgang Ossadnik & Stefanie Schinke & Ralf H. Kaspar, 2016. "Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 421-457, March.
    18. Ehsan Khanmohammadi & Mostafa Zandieh & Talieh Tayebi, 2019. "Drawing a Strategy Canvas Using the Fuzzy Best–Worst Method," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(1), pages 57-75, March.
    19. Mikhailov, L., 2004. "A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(3), pages 687-704, December.
    20. Ali Aghazadeh Ardebili & Elio Padoano & Antonella Longo & Antonio Ficarella, 2022. "The Risky-Opportunity Analysis Method (ROAM) to Support Risk-Based Decisions in a Case-Study of Critical Infrastructure Digitization," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:64:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11235-016-0168-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.