IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v37y2024i4d10.1007_s11213-023-09665-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Systems Heuristics: a Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Hutcheson

    (University of Strathclyde)

  • Alec Morton

    (University of Strathclyde)

  • Shona Blair

    (University of Strathclyde)

Abstract

Critical systems heuristics (CSH) has been influential in the development of critical systems thinking. However, it is a relatively underutilised method compared with soft systems approaches such as soft systems methodology (SSM) and cognitive mapping. This may be in part due to the complexity of ideas underpinning CSH. Core ideas with which users must feel confident include boundary critique, coercion, emancipation, and “is” vs “ought to be” framings. These ideas were the subject of the early discourse surrounding CSH, which considered the role of boundary critique in systems research, the extent to which CSH could meaningfully address coercion, and the claims of CSH as an emancipatory approach. The purpose of this review is to provide clarity on these key concepts by reflecting on how they have been addressed in the CSH literature to date. We find that CSH has been applied in a range of problem contexts and is most frequently applied to address coercion or power asymmetries. CSH research is frequently associated with advocacy for marginalised groups, and we believe this is a natural extension of the methodological emancipation to which CSH aspires. In providing an overview of the key ideas underpinning CSH, we hope to lower the barrier to application for systems researchers and practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Hutcheson & Alec Morton & Shona Blair, 2024. "Critical Systems Heuristics: a Systematic Review," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 499-514, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:37:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-023-09665-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-023-09665-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-023-09665-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-023-09665-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saad Algraini & Janet McIntyre-Mills, 2018. "Human Development in Saudi Education: a Critical Systemic Approach," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 121-157, April.
    2. Syed Arshad Raza & Atiq W. Siddiqui & Craig Standing, 2019. "Exploring Systemic Problems in IS Adoption Using Critical Systems Heuristics," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 125-153, April.
    3. W Ulrich, 2004. "Reply to the comments of Ormerod: the history of ideas of CST," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(11), pages 1238-1241, November.
    4. Suné Linde & Roelien Goede, 2021. "From Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, to Action Research in Improving the Programming Skills of Students," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 419-440, August.
    5. Carin Venter & Roelien Goede, 2017. "The Use of Critical Systems Heuristics to Surface and Reconcile Users' Conflicting Visions for a Business Intelligence System," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 407-432, August.
    6. Jackson, Mike C., 2001. "Critical systems thinking and practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 233-244, January.
    7. Dejana Zlatanović, 2015. "A Holistic Approach To Corporate Social Responsibility As A Prerequisite For Sustainable Development: Empirical Evidence," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 60(207), pages 69-94, September.
    8. Kish, K. & Mallery, D. & Yahya Haage, G. & Melgar-Melgar, R. & Burke, M. & Orr, C. & Smolyar, N.L. & Sanniti, S. & Larson, J., 2021. "Fostering critical pluralism with systems theory, methods, and heuristics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    9. Riswanda & Janet McIntyre-Mills & Yvonne Corcoran-Nantes, 2017. "Prostitution and Human Rights in Indonesia: A Critical Systemic Review of Policy Discourses and Scenarios," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 213-237, June.
    10. Pinzon-Salcedo, Luis Arturo & Torres-Cuello, Maria Alejandra, 2018. "Community Operational Research: Developing a systemic peace education programme involving urban and rural communities in Colombia," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 946-959.
    11. Ormerod, R. J., 1997. "The design of organisational intervention: Choosing the approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 415-435, August.
    12. Carin Venter, 2019. "A Critical Systems Approach to Elicit User-Centric Business Intelligence Business Requirements," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 481-500, October.
    13. Mahmoud Dehghan Nayeri & Moein Khazaei & Fatemeh Alinasab-Imani, 2020. "The Critical Heuristics of Iranian Banking Credit System: Analysis of the Antithetical Opinions of the Beneficiaries," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 363-392, June.
    14. Agus Bambang Irawan & Janet McIntyre-Mills, 2016. "Application of Critical Systems Thinking to Performance Auditing Practice at the Indonesian Supreme Audit Institution: Issues and Challenges," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 24-44, January.
    15. Carin Venter & Roelien Goede, 2018. "A Report and Reflection on an Application of Critical Systems Practice to Improve a Business Intelligence System's Business Requirements," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 548-563, September.
    16. W Ulrich, 2003. "Beyond methodology choice: critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourse," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(4), pages 325-342, April.
    17. R Ormerod, 2004. "A contribution to the discussion of Ulrich's paper," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(11), pages 1236-1238, November.
    18. Watson Manduna & Roelien Goede & Lynette Drevin, 2022. "Incorporating various perspectives in using instant messages in teaching programming: A critical system thinking perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 947-961, September.
    19. M C Jackson, 2005. "Sexing-up the evidence: a reply to Ormerod and Ulrich," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(4), pages 467-468, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Hutcheson & Alec Morton & Shona Blair, 2024. "Exploring Perspectives on Agroecological Transition in Scotland with Critical Systems Heuristics," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 459-482, August.
    2. Mahmoud Dehghan Nayeri & Moein Khazaei & Fatemeh Alinasab-Imani, 2020. "The Critical Heuristics of Iranian Banking Credit System: Analysis of the Antithetical Opinions of the Beneficiaries," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 363-392, June.
    3. J Mingers, 2005. "‘More dangerous than an unanswered question is an unquestioned answer’: a contribution to the Ulrich debate," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(4), pages 468-474, April.
    4. M C Jackson, 2005. "Sexing-up the evidence: a reply to Ormerod and Ulrich," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(4), pages 467-468, April.
    5. W Ulrich, 2004. "Reply to the comments of Ormerod: the history of ideas of CST," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(11), pages 1238-1241, November.
    6. Ormerod, Richard J. & Ulrich, Werner, 2013. "Operational research and ethics: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 291-307.
    7. R J Ormerod, 2007. "On the history and future of OR," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(6), pages 832-835, June.
    8. Carin Venter, 2019. "A Critical Systems Approach to Elicit User-Centric Business Intelligence Business Requirements," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 481-500, October.
    9. M C Jackson, 2003. "Deeper complementarism: a brief response to Ulrich," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(11), pages 1225-1226, November.
    10. Espinosa, Angela & Reficco, Ezequiel & Martínez, Andrea & Guzmán, David, 2015. "A methodology for supporting strategy implementation based on the VSM: A case study in a Latin-American multi-national," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 202-212.
    11. Sydelko, Pamela & Midgley, Gerald & Espinosa, Angela, 2021. "Designing interagency responses to wicked problems: Creating a common, cross-agency understanding," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 250-263.
    12. Luke Houghton, 2013. "Why Can't We All Just Accommodate: A Soft Systems Methodology Application on Disagreeing Stakeholders," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 430-443, July.
    13. R J Ormerod, 2008. "The transformation competence perspective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(11), pages 1435-1448, November.
    14. Mingers, John & White, Leroy, 2010. "A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1147-1161, December.
    15. Carin Venter & Roelien Goede, 2017. "The Use of Critical Systems Heuristics to Surface and Reconcile Users' Conflicting Visions for a Business Intelligence System," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 407-432, August.
    16. Moein Khazaei & Mohammad Ramezani & Amin Padash & Dorien DeTombe, 2021. "Creating shared value to redesigning IT-service products using SYRCS; Diagnosing and tackling complex problems," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 957-992, September.
    17. Raza, Syed Arshad, 2021. "Managing ethical requirements elicitation of complex socio-technical systems with critical systems thinking: A case of course-timetabling project," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    18. Mingers, John, 2011. "Ethics and OR: Operationalising discourse ethics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 114-124, April.
    19. Luke Houghton & David Tuffley, 2015. "Towards a Methodology of Wicked Problem Exploration through Concept Shifting and Tension Point Analysis," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 283-297, May.
    20. Luke Houghton & Larry Crump, 2016. "Temporal Events and Problem Structuring," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 324-340, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:37:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-023-09665-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.