IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v35y2022i4d10.1007_s11213-021-09581-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How can Cross-sector Partnership Promote Social Innovation?

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Asghar Sadabadi

    (Shahid Beheshti University)

  • Zohreh Rahimi Rad

    (Mazandaran University)

Abstract

Given the complexity of current social issues, Social Innovation (SI) entails cross-sector partnerships, including those between non-profit organizations and public and private sectors. However, our knowledge of the co-creation process through SI and its driving forces as well as the challenges one might face in cross-sector partnerships remains limited. The present study aimed to present a detailed analysis of SI implementation in marginalized societies to cover some of the gaps in the literature. To achieve this goal, the “Poultry Self-sufficiency” project implemented in two neighborhoods of Tehran to facilitate the operations of a social company established to alleviate poverty and empower the underprivileged and vulnerable populations was analyzed using the action research case study method. The AR process was conducted in three phases: (1) Identifying the solution; (2) Planning and pilot testing the solution; (3) SI scale up. Based on the empirical findings, the authors developed a conceptual model to describe co-creation in the social innovation life cycle. Through this co-creation between researchers, local citizens, a non-profit organization, and public and private sectors. Local citizens in the aforementioned areas witnessed a noticeable improvement in their living conditions. Ultimately, using the results derived from the codified data, six driving forces and three challenges influencing cross-sector partnerships in SI were identified and analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Asghar Sadabadi & Zohreh Rahimi Rad, 2022. "How can Cross-sector Partnership Promote Social Innovation?," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 471-490, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:35:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-021-09581-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-021-09581-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-021-09581-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-021-09581-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Spear, 2006. "Social entrepreneurship: a different model?," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 33(5/6), pages 339-410, May.
    2. Youngkeun Choi, 2015. "How Partnerships Affect the Social Performance of Korean Social Enterprises," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 257-277, November.
    3. Ardichvili, Alexander & Cardozo, Richard & Ray, Sourav, 2003. "A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 105-123, January.
    4. Jürgen Howaldt & Michael Schwarz, 2017. "Social Innovation and Human Development—How the Capabilities Approach and Social Innovation Theory Mutually Support Each Other," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 163-180, April.
    5. Stephen Sinclair & Neil McHugh & Michael J. Roy, 2021. "Social innovation, financialisation and commodification: a critique of social impact bonds," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 11-27, January.
    6. Steve Martin, 2010. "Co-production of social research: strategies for engaged scholarship," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 211-218, July.
    7. Aki Harima & Julia Freudenberg, 2020. "Co-Creation of Social Entrepreneurial Opportunities with Refugees," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 40-64, January.
    8. Cajaiba-Santana, Giovany, 2014. "Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 42-51.
    9. Daniel Alonso‐Martínez & Nuria González‐Álvarez & Mariano Nieto, 2019. "The influence of financial performance on corporate social innovation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 859-871, July.
    10. Stephan Manning & Daniel Roessler, 2014. "The Formation of Cross-Sector Development Partnerships: How Bridging Agents Shape Project Agendas and Longer-Term Alliances," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 527-547, September.
    11. Beena Salim Saji & Paul Ellingstad, 2016. "Social innovation model for business performance and innovation," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(2), pages 256-274, February.
    12. Cacciolatti, Luca & Rosli, Ainurul & Ruiz-Alba, José L. & Chang, Jane, 2020. "Strategic alliances and firm performance in startups with a social mission," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 106-117.
    13. W. H. Voorberg & V. J. J. M. Bekkers & L. G. Tummers, 2015. "A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1333-1357, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Holmström Lind, Christine & Kang, Olivia & Ljung, Anna & Rosenbaum, Paul, 2022. "Involvement of multinational corporations in social innovation: Exploring an emerging phenomenon," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 207-221.
    2. Petteri Repo & Kaisa Matschoss, 2019. "Social Innovation for Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Tachia Chin & Yin Yang & Pei Zhang & Xiaofen Yu & Luying Cao, 2019. "Co-creation of Social Innovation: Corporate Universities as Innovative Strategies for Chinese Firms to Engage with Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Tan, Wee-Liang & Zuckermann, Ghil'ad, 2021. "External impetus, co-production and grassroots innovations: The case of an innovation involving a language," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Wendy Phillips & Elizabeth A. Alexander & Hazel Lee, 2019. "Going It Alone Won’t Work! The Relational Imperative for Social Innovation in Social Enterprises," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 315-331, May.
    6. Figueiredo, Yohani Dominik dos Santos & Prim, Marcia Aparecida & Dandolini, Gertrudes Aparecida, 2022. "Urban regeneration in the light of social innovation: A systematic integrative literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Pel, Bonno & Haxeltine, Alex & Avelino, Flor & Dumitru, Adina & Kemp, René & Bauler, Tom & Kunze, Iris & Dorland, Jens & Wittmayer, Julia & Jørgensen, Michael Søgaard, 2020. "Towards a theory of transformative social innovation: A relational framework and 12 propositions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    8. Chih-Shiang (Mike) Wu & Tung-Jung (David) Sung, 2021. "Applying Values-Led Communication Design to Engage Stakeholders in Developing Dementia-Friendly Visitor Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Francisco Adro & Cristina I. Fernandes, 2020. "Social innovation: a systematic literature review and future agenda research," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 17(1), pages 23-40, March.
    10. Noor, Nur Hanis Mohamad & Ng, Boon-Kwee & Hamid, Mohd Johaary Abdul, 2020. "Forging researchers-farmers partnership in public social innovation: a case study of Malaysia’s agro-based public research institution," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(4), June.
    11. Néstor Vercher, 2022. "Environmental Conflicts and Social Innovation on the Balearic Islands (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Cacciolatti, Luca & Rosli, Ainurul & Ruiz-Alba, José L. & Chang, Jane, 2020. "Strategic alliances and firm performance in startups with a social mission," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 106-117.
    13. Thomas Hoppe & Gerdien De Vries, 2018. "Social Innovation and the Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Chang Soo Sung & Joo Y. Park, 2018. "Sustainability Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation: Is There a Tradeoff Relationship between Them?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
    15. John Hagedoorn & Helen Haugh & Paul Robson & Kate Sugar, 2023. "Social innovation, goal orientation, and openness: insights from social enterprise hybrids," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 173-198, January.
    16. Shaheer, Noman Ahmed & Li, Sali, 2020. "The CAGE around cyberspace? How digital innovations internationalize in a virtual world," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
    17. Manning, Stephan, 2017. "The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1399-1415.
    18. Grichnik, Dietmar & Smeja, Alexander & Welpe, Isabell, 2010. "The importance of being emotional: How do emotions affect entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation and exploitation?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 15-29, October.
    19. Antje Schmitt & Kathrin Rosing & Stephen X. Zhang & Michael Leatherbee, 2018. "A Dynamic Model of Entrepreneurial Uncertainty and Business Opportunity Identification: Exploration as a Mediator and Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy as a Moderator," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(6), pages 835-859, November.
    20. Wynen, Jan & Boon, Jan & Kleizen, Bjorn & Verhoest, Koen, 2020. "How multiple organizational changes shape managerial support for innovative work behavior : Evidence from the Australian Public Service," Other publications TiSEM 4f721d76-0c44-4d72-a494-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:35:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-021-09581-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.