IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v32y2019i4d10.1007_s11213-018-9464-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Impacts of Virtual Organization Absorption on the Quality of Urban Private Constructions; the System Dynamics Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hossein Moradi

    (Amirkabir University of Technology)

  • Mohamad Hassan Sebt

    (Amirkabir University of Technology)

  • Eghbal Shakeri

    (Amirkabir University of Technology)

Abstract

Quality compliance checking of urban private constructions in Iran follows a fragmented pattern. By considering this fragmentation along with the inherent complexities of the quality compliance checking, it becomes urgent to look closer at this mechanism to find a way for making improvements. Since there is no determination to change the existing mechanism, this study discusses the use of virtual organizations as a strategy to enhance the level of quality. To this end, according to the intended approach for developing virtual organizations, this study identifies the capabilities of this type of systems in the first step. Then, this research evaluates the impacts of virtual organization absorption on the quality of urban private constructions. In this evaluation, the paper applies the system dynamics approach as the modeling tool due to its ability to address complexities and feedback structures. The resulted dynamic model needs initial values and requires functions to be able to run the simulation. In this case, the Delphi Technique is used to extract the functions and the values. After importing the resulted values and functions into the model, the focus group is used for the validation. The result of this analysis represents the positive impacts of the virtual organization absorption in the quality compliance checking mechanism. Fifty-percent improvement in the quality level of urban private constructions after a twenty-year period is one of the results, which could be considered as an indicator of virtual organization impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Hossein Moradi & Mohamad Hassan Sebt & Eghbal Shakeri, 2019. "Evaluating the Impacts of Virtual Organization Absorption on the Quality of Urban Private Constructions; the System Dynamics Approach," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 443-462, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:32:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-018-9464-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-018-9464-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-018-9464-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-018-9464-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benoit Morel & Rangaraj Ramanujam, 1999. "Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: The Dynamics of Organizations as Adaptive and Evolving Systems," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 278-293, June.
    2. Christopher Durugbo, 2016. "Collaborative networks: a systematic review and multi-level framework," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(12), pages 3749-3776, June.
    3. Wang, William Y.C. & Chan, Hing Kai, 2010. "Virtual organization for supply chain integration: Two cases in the textile and fashion retailing industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 333-342, October.
    4. Khurram Iqbal Ahmad Khan & Roger Flanagan & Shu-Ling Lu, 2016. "Managing information complexity using system dynamics on construction projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 192-204, March.
    5. Stefania Mariano & Yukika Awazu, 2016. "Artifacts in knowledge management research: a systematic literature review and future research directions," Post-Print hal-01563006, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarratt, Denise & Ceric, Arnela, 2015. "The complexity of trust in business collaborations," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 2-12.
    2. Nguyen, Le Khanh Ngan & Howick, Susan & Megiddo, Itamar, 2024. "A framework for conceptualising hybrid system dynamics and agent-based simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1153-1166.
    3. Sergey Samoilenko, 2008. "Information systems fitness and risk in IS development: Insights and implications from chaos and complex systems theories," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 281-292, July.
    4. Chandra, Yanto & Wilkinson, Ian F., 2017. "Firm internationalization from a network-centric complex-systems perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 691-701.
    5. Ulrich Schmitt, 2021. "Projectability and Heritage Management of Design Knowledge: A Grass-Roots Artefact Perspective of a Longitudinal Research Project for Knowledge Management System Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Michela Pellicelli, 2018. "Gaining Flexibility and Innovation through Offshore Outsourcing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    7. Nicholas Berente & Kalle Lyytinen & Youngjin Yoo & John Leslie King, 2016. "Routines as Shock Absorbers During Organizational Transformation: Integration, Control, and NASA’s Enterprise Information System," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 551-572, June.
    8. Bill McKelvey & Benyamin B. Lichtenstein & Pierpaolo Andriani, 2012. "When organisations and ecosystems interact: toward a law of requisite fractality in firms," International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 104-136.
    9. Ekinci, Esra & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Sarma, P.R.S. & Sezer, Muruvvet Deniz & Ozbiltekin-Pala, Melisa, 2022. "Resilience and complexity measurement for energy efficient global supply chains in disruptive events," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Patanjal Kumar & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Yigit Kazancoglu & Ali Emrouznejad, 2023. "A decision framework for incorporating the coordination and behavioural issues in sustainable supply chains in digital economy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 721-749, July.
    11. Christo Coetzee & Dewald Niekerk & Emmanuel Raju, 2018. "Reconsidering disaster resilience: a nonlinear systems paradigm in agricultural communities in Southern Africa," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(2), pages 777-801, January.
    12. Geels, Frank W., 2010. "Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 495-510, May.
    13. Philip Anderson, 1999. "Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 216-232, June.
    14. Mariano, Stefania & Al-Arrayed, Suad, 2018. "Combinations of absorptive capacity metaroutines: The role of organizational disruptions and time constraints," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 171-182.
    15. Uddin, Shahadat & Murshed, Shahriar Tanvir Hasan & Hossain, Liaquat, 2011. "Power-law behavior in complex organizational communication networks during crisis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(15), pages 2845-2853.
    16. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3109 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. McKelvey Bill, 2016. "Complexity Ingredients Required For Entrepreneurial Success," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 53-73, January.
    18. L. Metcalf & S. Benn, 2012. "The Corporation is Ailing Social Technology: Creating a ‘Fit for Purpose’ Design for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 195-210, December.
    19. Zoppelletto, Alessia & Bullini Orlandi, Ludovico, 2022. "Cultural and digital collaboration infrastructures as sustainability enhancing factors: A configurational approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    20. Mauno, Tuomas & Catelo, Fellice & Bengston, David N. & Pykäläinen, Jouni & Hujala, Teppo, 2023. "How to identify and interpret weak signals of change in the forest bioeconomy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    21. Franck Marle & Hadi Jaber & Catherine Pointurier, 2019. "Organizing Project Actors for Collective Decision-Making about Interdependent Risks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:32:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-018-9464-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.