IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v59y2018i1d10.1007_s00362-016-0764-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Randomized response techniques for a multi-level attribute using a single sensitive question

Author

Listed:
  • Shu-Hui Hsieh

    (Academia Sinica)

  • Shen-Ming Lee

    (Feng Chia University)

  • Su-Hao Tu

    (Academia Sinica)

Abstract

Collecting reliable responses to sensitive survey questions is challenging, since respondents may be more likely to refuse to respond or to provide biased responses. To address these challenges, Warner (J Am Stat Assoc 60:63–69, 1965) pioneered the randomized response (RR) technique to estimate proportions of individuals in a population with either of two possible attributes. The RR technique can overcome non-response and underreporting biases because it doesn’t reveal the respondent’s attribute, and a generalization of the random component of the response by Christofides (Metrika 57:195–200, 2003) improves estimation properties. In this study, we develop a new RR model to estimate proportions of individuals with each of multiple categories of an attribute using a single sensitive question by means of only one randomization device based on Christofides’s (Metrika 57:195–200, 2003) model. Under the proposed model, a respondent reports the absolute difference between an integer associated with his or her attribute and a random integer. In a part of this research, we conduct a simulation study of the relative efficiency of the proposed methods. The technique is illustrated using data from the 2012 Family and Gender Module of the Taiwan Social Change Survey to estimate the proportions of individuals of different sexual orientations, and the results are compared with the results of direct inquiry from the same survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu-Hui Hsieh & Shen-Ming Lee & Su-Hao Tu, 2018. "Randomized response techniques for a multi-level attribute using a single sensitive question," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 291-306, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:59:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s00362-016-0764-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-016-0764-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-016-0764-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-016-0764-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Cheon-Sig & Sedory, Stephen A. & Singh, Sarjinder, 2013. "Estimating at least seven measures of qualitative variables from a single sample using randomized response technique," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 399-409.
    2. Christopher R. Gjestvang & Sarjinder Singh, 2006. "A new randomized response model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(3), pages 523-530, June.
    3. Lucio Barabesi & Sara Franceschi & Marzia Marcheselli, 2012. "A randomized response procedure for multiple-sensitive questions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 703-718, August.
    4. Tasos Christofides, 2005. "Randomized response technique for two sensitive characteristics at the same time," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 53-63, September.
    5. Seil, K.S. & Desai, M.M. & Smith, M.V., 2014. "Sexual orientation, adult connectedness, substance use, and mental health outcomes among adolescents: Findings From the 2009 New York city youth risk behavior survey," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(10), pages 1950-1956.
    6. Gerty J. L. M. Lensvelt-Mulders & Joop J. Hox & Peter G. M. van der Heijden & Cora J. M. Maas, 2005. "Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 33(3), pages 319-348, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hua Xin & Jianping Zhu & Tzong-Ru Tsai & Chieh-Yi Hung, 2021. "Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling and Randomized Response Method for Inferring the Sensitive-Nature Proportion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Truong-Nhat Le & Shen-Ming Lee & Phuoc-Loc Tran & Chin-Shang Li, 2023. "Randomized Response Techniques: A Systematic Review from the Pioneering Work of Warner (1965) to the Present," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Shu-Hui Hsieh & Shen-Ming Lee & Chin-Shang Li, 2022. "A Two-stage Multilevel Randomized Response Technique With Proportional Odds Models and Missing Covariates," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(1), pages 439-467, February.
    4. Shen-Ming Lee & Phuoc-Loc Tran & Truong-Nhat Le & Chin-Shang Li, 2023. "Prediction of a Sensitive Feature under Indirect Questioning via Warner’s Randomized Response Technique and Latent Class Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucio Barabesi & Giancarlo Diana & Pier Perri, 2013. "Design-based distribution function estimation for stigmatized populations," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 76(7), pages 919-935, October.
    2. Truong-Nhat Le & Shen-Ming Lee & Phuoc-Loc Tran & Chin-Shang Li, 2023. "Randomized Response Techniques: A Systematic Review from the Pioneering Work of Warner (1965) to the Present," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-26, April.
    3. María del Mar Rueda & Beatriz Cobo & Antonio Arcos, 2021. "Regression Models in Complex Survey Sampling for Sensitive Quantitative Variables," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Lucio Barabesi & Giancarlo Diana & Pier Perri, 2015. "Gini index estimation in randomized response surveys," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 99(1), pages 45-62, January.
    5. Shu-Hui Hsieh & Shen-Ming Lee & Chin-Shang Li & Su-Hao Tu, 2016. "An alternative to unrelated randomized response techniques with logistic regression analysis," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 25(4), pages 601-621, November.
    6. Kajal Dihidar & Manjima Bhattacharya, 2017. "Estimating Sensitive Population Proportion Using A Combination Of Binomial And Hypergeometric Randomized Responses By Direct And Inverse Mechanism," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 18(2), pages 193-210, June.
    7. Oluseun Odumade & Sarjinder Singh, 2010. "An Alternative to the Bar-Lev, Bobovitch, and Boukai Randomized Response Model," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 39(2), pages 206-221, November.
    8. Clarke, George, 2012. "Do reticent managers lie during firm surveys?," MPRA Paper 37634, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Jung-Sheng Chen & Yu-Te Huang & Chung-Ying Lin & Cheng-Fang Yen & Mark D. Griffiths & Amir H. Pakpour, 2021. "Relationships of Sexual Orientation Microaggression with Anxiety and Depression among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Taiwanese Youth: Self-Identity Disturbance Mediates but Gender Does Not Moderate the Re," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Sarjinder Singh, 2020. "Reply to the correction by Grover and Kaur: a new randomized response model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(3), pages 865-868, July.
    11. Housila P. Singh & Swarangi M. Gorey, 2017. "A Generalized Randomized Response Model," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 18(4), pages 669-686, December.
    12. Blume, Andreas & Lai, Ernest K. & Lim, Wooyoung, 2019. "Eliciting private information with noise: The case of randomized response," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 356-380.
    13. Giancarlo Diana & Pier Francesco Perri, 2010. "New scrambled response models for estimating the mean of a sensitive quantitative character," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(11), pages 1875-1890.
    14. Jensen, Nathan M & Rahman, Aminur, 2011. "The silence of corruption : identifying underreporting of business corruption through randomized response techniques," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5696, The World Bank.
    15. Chung-Ying Lin & Yu-Te Huang & Chiu-Hsiang Lee & Chia-Wei Fan & Cheng-Fang Yen, 2022. "Gay Community Stress Scale with Its Cultural Translation and Adaptions in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
    16. Isabel Thielmann & Daniel W. Heck & Benjamin E. Hilbig, 2016. "Anonymity and incentives: An investigation of techniques to reduce socially desirable responding in the Trust Game," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(5), pages 527-536, September.
    17. Sheabo Dessalegn, S., 2017. "Social capital and maternal health care use in rural Ethiopia," Other publications TiSEM bb0ec225-4ec3-4028-90d6-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. John, Leslie K. & Loewenstein, George & Acquisti, Alessandro & Vosgerau, Joachim, 2018. "When and why randomized response techniques (fail to) elicit the truth," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 101-123.
    19. Erum Zahid & Javid Shabbir & Sat Gupta & Ronald Onyango & Sadia Saeed, 2022. "A generalized class of estimators for sensitive variable in the presence of measurement error and non-response," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Liu, Yin & Tian, Guo-Liang, 2013. "A variant of the parallel model for sample surveys with sensitive characteristics," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 115-135.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:59:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s00362-016-0764-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.