IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stmapp/v26y2017i4d10.1007_s10260-017-0382-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical likelihood ratio in penalty form and the convex hull problem

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Baragona

    (Universita La Sapienza)

  • Francesco Battaglia

    (Universita La Sapienza)

  • Domenico Cucina

    (University of Salerno)

Abstract

The empirical likelihood ratio is not defined when the null vector does not belong to the convex hull of the estimating functions computed on the data. This may happen with non-negligible probability when the number of observations is small and the dimension of the estimating functions is large: it is called the convex hull problem. Several modifications have been proposed to overcome such drawback: the penalized, the adjusted, the balanced and the extended empirical likelihoods, though they yield different values from the ordinary empirical likelihood in all cases. The convex hull problem is addressed here in the framework of nonlinear optimization, proposing to follow the penalty method. A generalized empirical likelihood in penalty form is considered, and all the proposed modifications are shown to be in that form. We propose simple penalty forms of the empirical likelihood, whose values are equal to those of the ordinary empirical likelihood when the convex hull condition is satisfied. A comparison by simulation and real data is included. All proofs and additional simulation results appear in the Supplementary Material.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Baragona & Francesco Battaglia & Domenico Cucina, 2017. "Empirical likelihood ratio in penalty form and the convex hull problem," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(4), pages 507-529, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:26:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10260-017-0382-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10260-017-0382-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10260-017-0382-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10260-017-0382-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Camponovo, Lorenzo & Otsu, Taisuke, 2014. "On Bartlett correctability of empirical likelihood in generalized power divergence family," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 38-43.
    2. Song Chen & Ingrid Van Keilegom, 2009. "A review on empirical likelihood methods for regression," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(3), pages 415-447, November.
    3. Hongtu Zhu & Joseph G. Ibrahim & Niansheng Tang & Heping Zhang, 2008. "Diagnostic measures for empirical likelihood of general estimating equations," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(2), pages 489-507.
    4. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    5. Grendar, Marian & Judge, George G, 2009. "Maximum empirical likelihood : empty set problem," CUDARE Working Paper Series 1090, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy.
    6. Nicola Lunardon & Gianfranco Adimari, 2016. "Second-order Accurate Confidence Regions Based on Members of the Generalized Power Divergence Family," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(1), pages 213-227, March.
    7. Grendar, Marian & Judge, George G, 2009. "Maximum Empirical Likelihood: Empty Set Problem," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt71v338mh, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    8. Min Tsao & Fan Wu, 2014. "Extended empirical likelihood for estimating equations," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(3), pages 703-710.
    9. Bartolucci, Francesco, 2007. "A penalized version of the empirical likelihood ratio for the population mean," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 104-110, January.
    10. Roberto Baragona & Francesco Battaglia & Domenico Cucina, 2016. "Empirical Likelihood for Outlier Detection and Estimation in Autoregressive Time Series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 315-336, May.
    11. Pena, Daniel, 1990. "Influential Observations in Time Series," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 8(2), pages 235-241, April.
    12. Jiahua Chen & Yi Huang, 2013. "Finite-sample properties of the adjusted empirical likelihood," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 147-159, March.
    13. Chen, Song Xi & Cui, Hengjian, 2007. "On the second-order properties of empirical likelihood with moment restrictions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 492-516, December.
    14. Cheng Yong Tang & Chenlei Leng, 2010. "Penalized high-dimensional empirical likelihood," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 97(4), pages 905-920.
    15. Gianfranco Adimari & Annamaria Guolo, 2010. "A note on the asymptotic behaviour of empirical likelihood statistics," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 19(4), pages 463-476, November.
    16. Song Chen & Ingrid Van Keilegom, 2009. "Rejoinder on: A review on empirical likelihood methods for regression," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(3), pages 468-474, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chang, Jinyuan & Chen, Song Xi & Chen, Xiaohong, 2015. "High dimensional generalized empirical likelihood for moment restrictions with dependent data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 283-304.
    2. Zhang, Jia & Shi, Haoming & Tian, Lemeng & Xiao, Fengjun, 2019. "Penalized generalized empirical likelihood in high-dimensional weakly dependent data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 270-283.
    3. Tong Tong Wu & Gang Li & Chengyong Tang, 2015. "Empirical Likelihood for Censored Linear Regression and Variable Selection," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(3), pages 798-812, September.
    4. Qinqin Hu & Lu Lin, 2017. "Conditional sure independence screening by conditional marginal empirical likelihood," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(1), pages 63-96, February.
    5. Mahdieh Bayati & Seyed Kamran Ghoreishi & Jingjing Wu, 2021. "Bayesian analysis of restricted penalized empirical likelihood," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1321-1339, June.
    6. Hui-Ling Lin & Zhouping Li & Dongliang Wang & Yichuan Zhao, 2017. "Jackknife empirical likelihood for the error variance in linear models," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 151-166, April.
    7. Xianyang Zhang & Xiaofeng Shao, 2016. "On the coverage bound problem of empirical likelihood methods for time series," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(2), pages 395-421, March.
    8. Min Tsao & Fan Wu, 2014. "Extended empirical likelihood for estimating equations," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(3), pages 703-710.
    9. Sanjay Chaudhuri & Debashis Mondal & Teng Yin, 2017. "Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling in Bayesian empirical likelihood computation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(1), pages 293-320, January.
    10. Li, Minqiang & Peng, Liang & Qi, Yongcheng, 2011. "Reduce computation in profile empirical likelihood method," MPRA Paper 33744, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Zhao, Yichuan & Su, Yueju & Yang, Hanfang, 2020. "Jackknife empirical likelihood inference for the Pietra ratio," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Zang, Yangguang & Zhang, Sanguo & Li, Qizhai & Zhang, Qingzhao, 2016. "Jackknife empirical likelihood test for high-dimensional regression coefficients," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 302-316.
    13. Hong Guo & Changliang Zou & Zhaojun Wang & Bin Chen, 2014. "Empirical likelihood for high-dimensional linear regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 77(7), pages 921-945, October.
    14. Tang, Niansheng & Yan, Xiaodong & Zhao, Puying, 2018. "Exponentially tilted likelihood inference on growing dimensional unconditional moment models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 57-74.
    15. Weihua Zhao & Riquan Zhang & Yukun Liu & Jicai Liu, 2015. "Empirical likelihood based modal regression," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 411-430, May.
    16. Xia Chen & Liyue Mao, 2020. "Penalized empirical likelihood for partially linear errors-in-variables models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 104(4), pages 597-623, December.
    17. Zemin Zheng & Jie Zhang & Yang Li, 2022. "L 0 -Regularized Learning for High-Dimensional Additive Hazards Regression," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2762-2775, September.
    18. Otsu, Taisuke & Xu, Ke-Li & Matsushita, Yukitoshi, 2015. "Empirical likelihood for regression discontinuity design," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 94-112.
    19. Karun Adusumilli & Taisuke Otsu, 2017. "Empirical Likelihood for Random Sets," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(519), pages 1064-1075, July.
    20. repec:cep:stiecm:/2014/574 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Jin, Fei & Lee, Lung-fei, 2019. "GEL estimation and tests of spatial autoregressive models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 585-612.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:26:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10260-017-0382-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.