IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stabio/v8y2016i1d10.1007_s12561-014-9122-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personalized Evaluation of Biomarker Value: A Cost-Benefit Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Huang

    (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center)

  • Eric Laber

    (North Carolina State University)

Abstract

For a patient who is facing a treatment decision, the added value of information provided by a biomarker depends on the individual patient’s expected response to treatment with and without the biomarker, as well as his/her tolerance of disease and treatment harm. However, individualized estimators of the value of a biomarker are lacking. We propose a new graphical tool named the subject-specific expected benefit curve for quantifying the personalized value of a biomarker in aiding a treatment decision. We develop semiparametric estimators for two general settings: (i) when biomarker data are available from a randomized trial; and (ii) when biomarker data are available from a cohort or a cross-sectional study, together with external information about a multiplicative treatment effect. We also develop adaptive bootstrap confidence intervals for consistent inference in the presence of nonregularity. The proposed method is used to evaluate the individualized value of the serum creatinine marker in informing treatment decisions for the prevention of renal artery stenosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Huang & Eric Laber, 2016. "Personalized Evaluation of Biomarker Value: A Cost-Benefit Perspective," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 8(1), pages 43-65, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:8:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s12561-014-9122-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12561-014-9122-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12561-014-9122-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12561-014-9122-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baqun Zhang & Anastasios A. Tsiatis & Eric B. Laber & Marie Davidian, 2012. "A Robust Method for Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1010-1018, December.
    2. Laber, Eric B. & Murphy, Susan A., 2011. "Adaptive Confidence Intervals for the Test Error in Classification," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(495), pages 904-913.
    3. Keisuke Hirano & Jack R. Porter, 2012. "Impossibility Results for Nondifferentiable Functionals," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 1769-1790, July.
    4. Ying Huang & Peter B. Gilbert & Holly Janes, 2012. "Assessing Treatment-Selection Markers using a Potential Outcomes Framework," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 687-696, September.
    5. Yingqi Zhao & Donglin Zeng & A. John Rush & Michael R. Kosorok, 2012. "Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(499), pages 1106-1118, September.
    6. Xiao Song & Margaret Pepe, 2004. "Evaluating Markers for Selecting a Patient's Treatment," UW Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1029, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    7. Stuart G. Baker & Nancy R. Cook & Andrew Vickers & Barnett S. Kramer, 2009. "Using relative utility curves to evaluate risk prediction," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(4), pages 729-748, October.
    8. Lihui Zhao & Lu Tian & Tianxi Cai & Brian Claggett & L. J. Wei, 2013. "Effectively Selecting a Target Population for a Future Comparative Study," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(502), pages 527-539, June.
    9. Andrew J. Vickers & Elena B. Elkin, 2006. "Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction Models," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(6), pages 565-574, November.
    10. A. Cecile J. W. Janssens & Yazhong Deng & Gerard J. J. M. Borsboom & Marinus J. C. Eijkemans & J. Dik. F. Habbema & Ewout W. Steyerberg, 2005. "A New Logistic Regression Approach for the Evaluation of Diagnostic Test Results," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(2), pages 168-177, March.
    11. Xiao Song & Margaret Sullivan Pepe, 2004. "Evaluating Markers for Selecting a Patient's Treatment," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 874-883, December.
    12. Ying Huang & Margaret Sullivan Pepe & Ziding Feng, 2007. "Evaluating the Predictiveness of a Continuous Marker," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1181-1188, December.
    13. Stuart G. Baker & Barnett S. Kramer, 2005. "Statistics for weighing benefits and harms in a proposed genetic substudy of a randomized cancer prevention trial," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 54(5), pages 941-954, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janes Holly & Brown Marshall D. & Huang Ying & Pepe Margaret S., 2014. "An Approach to Evaluating and Comparing Biomarkers for Patient Treatment Selection," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 99-121, May.
    2. Roland A. Matsouaka & Junlong Li & Tianxi Cai, 2014. "Evaluating marker-guided treatment selection strategies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 489-499, September.
    3. Ying Huang & Juhee Cho & Youyi Fong, 2021. "Threshold‐based subgroup testing in logistic regression models in two‐phase sampling designs," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(2), pages 291-311, March.
    4. James Y. Dai & C. Jason Liang & Michael LeBlanc & Ross L. Prentice & Holly Janes, 2018. "Case†only approach to identifying markers predicting treatment effects on the relative risk scale," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 753-763, June.
    5. Chaeryon Kang & Holly Janes & Ying Huang, 2014. "Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 695-707, September.
    6. Veronika Skrivankova & Patrick J. Heagerty, 2018. "Single index methods for evaluation of marker†guided treatment rules based on multivariate marker panels," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 663-672, June.
    7. Ying Huang & Youyi Fong, 2014. "Identifying optimal biomarker combinations for treatment selection via a robust kernel method," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 891-901, December.
    8. Xin Qiu & Donglin Zeng & Yuanjia Wang, 2018. "Estimation and evaluation of linear individualized treatment rules to guarantee performance," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 517-528, June.
    9. Yaoyao Xu & Menggang Yu & Ying‐Qi Zhao & Quefeng Li & Sijian Wang & Jun Shao, 2015. "Regularized outcome weighted subgroup identification for differential treatment effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 645-653, September.
    10. Juan Shen & Xuming He, 2015. "Inference for Subgroup Analysis With a Structured Logistic-Normal Mixture Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 303-312, March.
    11. Shi, Chengchun & Lu, Wenbin & Song, Rui, 2019. "A sparse random projection-based test for overall qualitative treatment effects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102107, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Dana Johnson & Wenbin Lu & Marie Davidian, 2023. "A general framework for subgroup detection via one‐step value difference estimation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2116-2126, September.
    13. Shengli An & Peter Zhang & Hong-Bin Fang, 2023. "Subgroup Identification in Survival Outcome Data Based on Concordance Probability Measurement," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-10, June.
    14. Zhen Li & Jie Chen & Eric Laber & Fang Liu & Richard Baumgartner, 2023. "Optimal Treatment Regimes: A Review and Empirical Comparison," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(3), pages 427-463, December.
    15. Xu Gao & Weining Shen & Jing Ning & Ziding Feng & Jianhua Hu, 2022. "Addressing patient heterogeneity in disease predictive model development," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1045-1055, September.
    16. Shuai Chen & Lu Tian & Tianxi Cai & Menggang Yu, 2017. "A general statistical framework for subgroup identification and comparative treatment scoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1199-1209, December.
    17. Ailin Fan & Rui Song & Wenbin Lu, 2017. "Change-Plane Analysis for Subgroup Detection and Sample Size Calculation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 769-778, April.
    18. Ruo-fan Wu & Ming Zheng & Wen Yu, 2016. "Subgroup Analysis with Time-to-Event Data Under a Logistic-Cox Mixture Model," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(3), pages 863-878, September.
    19. Peng Jin & Wenbin Lu & Yu Chen & Mengling Liu, 2023. "Change‐plane analysis for subgroup detection with a continuous treatment," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 1920-1933, September.
    20. Jingxiang Chen & Haoda Fu & Xuanyao He & Michael R. Kosorok & Yufeng Liu, 2018. "Estimating individualized treatment rules for ordinal treatments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 924-933, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:8:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s12561-014-9122-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.