IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v150y2020i2d10.1007_s11205-020-02316-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mixed Approach for Data Fusion of HBS and SILC

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Cutillo

    (ISTAT – Istituto Nazionale di Statistica)

  • Mauro Scanu

    (ISTAT – Istituto Nazionale di Statistica)

Abstract

This paper presents an effective procedure for matching data from the Italian Household Budget Survey (HBS) and the Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC), carried out by the Italian National Statistical Institute. In recent years, there is an emerging consensus on the need for distributional measures of well-being as a joint function of income and consumption, that should be jointly explored for explaining the households’ economic conditions. However, the Italian National Statistical Institute does not maintain a unified database on income and expenditures for consumption. One of the most widespread approaches for fusing data is to use statistical matching techniques, which are based on the Conditional Independence Assumption. This assumption implies that the variables of interest are independent, given a set of common auxiliary variables with strong explicative power on income and consumption. Between the auxiliary variables, we also exploit suitable variables which are proxy of income, thus permitting to impute income on HBS, and proxy of consumption, thus permitting to impute consumption on SILC. The joint distribution of the proxies can be considered as a proxy of the joint distribution between income and consumption. Moreover, through the use of two synthetic measures, we reduce the dimensionality of the set of auxiliary variables, simultaneously preserving as much as possible of the available common information and the correlation structure between the auxiliaries and income, as observed in SILC, and between the auxiliaries and consumption, as observed in HBS. The contribution to the existing literature is various. In particular, we obtain a pooled sample with income and consumption, while previous attempts aimed at imputing only one of the two variables of interest in one survey. Second, the uncertainty deriving from the lack of information on the joint distribution of income and consumption is reduced with respect to previous works. Finally, the use of proxies, the high quality of the other auxiliary variables, as well as the particular mixed-mode matching procedure, permit to take advantage of all the available information reducing it to only two dimensions, so that the Conditional Independence can be considered a mild assumption. Keeping in mind that an effective matching for also imputing wealth, that is the third pillar of the households’ economic wellbeing, is yet to come, the joined dataset could permit several types of analyses on economic inequalities and fiscal policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Cutillo & Mauro Scanu, 2020. "A Mixed Approach for Data Fusion of HBS and SILC," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 411-437, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:150:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-020-02316-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-020-02316-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-020-02316-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-020-02316-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce D. Meyer & James X. Sullivan, 2003. "Measuring the Well-Being of the Poor Using Income and Consumption," NBER Working Papers 9760, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Rodgers, Willard L, 1984. "An Evaluation of Statistical Matching," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 2(1), pages 91-102, January.
    3. Chiara Elena Dalla & Menon Martina & Perali Federico, 2019. "An Integrated Database to Measure Living Standards," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 35(3), pages 531-576, September.
    4. Bruce D. Meyer & James X. Sullivan, 2013. "Consumption and Income Inequality and the Great Recession," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(3), pages 178-183, May.
    5. Pier Luigi Conti & Daniela Marella & Mauro Scanu, 2016. "Statistical Matching Analysis for Complex Survey Data With Applications," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1715-1725, October.
    6. Gabriella Donatiello & Marcello D’Orazio & Doriana Frattarola & Antony Rizzi & Mauro Scanu & Mattia Spaziani, 2014. "Statistical Matching of Income and Consumption Expenditures," International Journal of Economic Sciences, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(3), pages 50-65.
    7. Richard Blundell & Luigi Pistaferri & Itay Saporta-Eksten, 2016. "Consumption Inequality and Family Labor Supply," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(2), pages 387-435, February.
    8. Tedeschi, Simone & Pisano, Elena, 2013. "Data Fusion Between Bank of Italy-SHIW and ISTAT-HBS," MPRA Paper 51253, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Milton Friedman, 1957. "A Theory of the Consumption Function," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number frie57-1.
    10. Bruce D. Meyer & James X. Sullivan, 2011. "Viewpoint: Further results on measuring the well‐being of the poor using income and consumption," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 52-87, February.
    11. Gabriella Donatiello & Marcello D'Orazio & Doriana Frattarola & Antony Rizzi & Mauro Scanu & Mattia Spaziani, 2014. "Statistical matching of income and consumption expenditures," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0100965, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    12. Atkinson, Anthony B., 2015. "Inequality: what can be done?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101810, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Claudio Ceccarelli & Andrea Cutillo & Davide Di Laurea, 2009. "Metodologie per la stima degli affitti figurativi ed impatto sulla distribuzione del reddito," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 11(1), pages 17-38, September.
    14. Christopher D. Carroll & Thomas F. Crossley & John Sabelhaus, 2015. "Improving the Measurement of Consumer Expenditures," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number carr11-1.
    15. Milton Friedman, 1957. "Introduction to "A Theory of the Consumption Function"," NBER Chapters, in: A Theory of the Consumption Function, pages 1-6, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Kiesl, Hans & Rässler, Susanne, 2006. "How valid can data fusion be?," IAB-Discussion Paper 200615, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    17. Rubin, Donald B, 1986. "Statistical Matching Using File Concatenation with Adjusted Weights and Multiple Imputations," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 4(1), pages 87-94, January.
    18. Pier Luigi Conti & Daniela Marella & Andrea Neri, 2017. "Statistical matching and uncertainty analysis in combining household income and expenditure data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(3), pages 485-505, August.
    19. Marco Di Marco, 2008. "Monthly Income As a Core Social Variable: Evidence From the Italian EU SILC Survey," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 10(2), pages 13-31, October.
    20. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    21. Giulia Cifaldi & Andrea Neri, 2013. "Asking income and consumption questions in the same survey: what are the risks?," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 908, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    22. Mike Brewer & Cormac O'Dea, 2012. "Measuring living standards with income and consumption: evidence from the UK," IFS Working Papers W12/12, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    23. Orazio P. Attanasio & Luigi Pistaferri, 2016. "Consumption Inequality," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 3-28, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehboob Ali & Göran Kauermann, 2021. "A split questionnaire survey design in the context of statistical matching," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(4), pages 1219-1236, October.
    2. Andrea Cutillo & Michele Raitano & Isabella Siciliani, 2022. "Income-Based and Consumption-Based Measurement of Absolute Poverty: Insights from Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 689-710, June.
    3. Luca Secondi, 2021. "Estimating Household Consumption Expenditure at Local Level In Italy: The Potential of the Cokriging Spatial Predictor," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 651-674, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Cutillo & Michele Raitano & Isabella Siciliani, 2022. "Income-Based and Consumption-Based Measurement of Absolute Poverty: Insights from Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 689-710, June.
    2. Han, Jeehoon & Meyer, Bruce D. & Sullivan, James X., 2020. "Inequality in the joint distribution of consumption and time use," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Chiara Elena Dalla & Menon Martina & Perali Federico, 2019. "An Integrated Database to Measure Living Standards," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 35(3), pages 531-576, September.
    4. Mohsen Ayyash & Siok Kun Sek, 2020. "Decomposing Inequality in Household Consumption Expenditure in Malaysia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Petra Gerlach-Kristen & Rossana Merola, 2019. "Consumption and credit constraints: a model and evidence from Ireland," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 475-503, August.
    6. Christian Dustmann & Bernd Fitzenberger & Markus Zimmermann, 2022. "Housing Expenditure and Income Inequality," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(645), pages 1709-1736.
    7. Brant Abbott & Giovanni Gallipoli, 2018. "Human Capital Inequality: Empirical Evidence," Working Papers 2018-085, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    8. Giacomo De Giorgi & Luca Gambetti & Costanza Naguib, 2023. "Life-Cycle Inequality: the Black and White Differential," Diskussionsschriften dp2301, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    9. Francesco Scervini & Serena Trucchi, 2022. "Intergenerational Precautionary Savings in Europe," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(2), pages 427-450, April.
    10. De Giorgi, Giacomo & Gambetti, Luca & Naguib, Costanza, 2020. "Life-Cycle Inequality: Blacks And Whites Differentials In Life Expectancy, Savings, Income, And Consumption," CEPR Discussion Papers 15182, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Robin Jessen & Johannes König, 2023. "Hours risk and wage risk: repercussions over the life cycle," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 125(4), pages 956-996, October.
    12. Stefanie Huber, 2022. "SHE canÕt afford it and HE doesnÕt want it: The gender gap in the COVID-19 consumption response," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-029/II, Tinbergen Institute.
    13. Fatih Elcin, 2024. "Global Consumption Disparities: Unveiling a Persistent Divide," World Journal of Applied Economics, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Jessen, Robin & König, Johannes, 2018. "Hours risk, wage risk, and life-cycle labor supply," Ruhr Economic Papers 771, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    15. Pier Luigi Conti & Daniela Marella & Andrea Neri, 2017. "Statistical matching and uncertainty analysis in combining household income and expenditure data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(3), pages 485-505, August.
    16. Lichner, Ivan & Lyócsa, Štefan & Výrostová, Eva, 2022. "Nominal and discretionary household income convergence: The effect of a crisis in a small open economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 18-31.
    17. Pottier, Antonin, 2022. "Expenditure elasticity and income elasticity of GHG emissions: A survey of literature on household carbon footprint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    18. Brant Abbott & Giovanni Gallipoli, 2022. "Permanent‐income inequality," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(3), pages 1023-1060, July.
    19. Lamarche, Pierre, 2017. "Estimating consumption in the HFCS: Experimental results on the first wave of the HFCS," Statistics Paper Series 22, European Central Bank.
    20. Moira Daly & Dmytro Hryshko & Iourii Manovskii, 2022. "Improving The Measurement Of Earnings Dynamics," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(1), pages 95-124, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:150:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-020-02316-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.