IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snbeco/v2y2022i12d10.1007_s43546-022-00372-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling rice consumption preferences: an improved approach

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul-Basit Tampuli Abukari

    (University for Development Studies)

  • Suad Morro

    (University for Development Studies)

  • Munkaila Lambongang

    (North Dakota State University)

Abstract

Rice is considered the second most important cereal to maize in Africa. Unlike maize, its consumption outweighs its domestic production leading to a high import wage bill. Ghana has been tackling this problem through various policies and programs which include increasing domestic production. However, consumer preferences for certain characteristics of rice have impeded the effort to reverse this trend, despite increasing domestic production. Studies on rice consumption preferences have often lacked a broader contextualization of rice consumption patterns. These studies have often targeted consumption at the household level ignoring the fact that consumption at the vending level is equally important, especially in cities and cosmopolitan areas. This study has been able to model consumption preferences at both household and vending levels. The studies analyzed data from 100 food (rice) vendors and 200 households in the Tamale Metropolis and Sagnarigu Municipality. A probit model is used with a suspected endogenous variable (origin of rice), which is controlled for using the Wooldridge control function approach. The study revealed preference for imported rice is less likely in the household compared with the vending level. Other characteristics of rice such as cooking time, cleanness, color, aroma, grain size, texture, expansion capacity, perceived nutritional benefits, and packaging were found to affect consumer’s preferences both at the household and vending levels. 10 local rice processors were interviewed on their ability to produce rice reflecting these characteristics consumers consider. The challenges they faced were also analyzed. The study recommends factoring in rice vendors in both research and policy formulation relating to decreasing rice importation. It also recommends consideration of rice processing companies in the One District One Factory (IDIF) program.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul-Basit Tampuli Abukari & Suad Morro & Munkaila Lambongang, 2022. "Modeling rice consumption preferences: an improved approach," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(12), pages 1-26, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:2:y:2022:i:12:d:10.1007_s43546-022-00372-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s43546-022-00372-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43546-022-00372-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43546-022-00372-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Meyer, 2016. "Obesity and Health-Care Costs in Switzerland: Dealing with Endogeneity in Non-Linear Regression Models," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 152(3), pages 243-286, July.
    2. Laizer, Japhet S. & Baharanyi, Ntam R. & Zabawa, Robert & Kadigi, Reuben M. J., 2018. "Determinants of Consumer Preference for and Expenditure on Rice in the Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal (PAWJ), Professional Agricultural Workers Conference, vol. 6(1), August.
    3. Manalo, Alberto B., 1990. "Assessing The Importance Of Apple Attributes: An Agricultural Application Of Conjoint Analysis," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1-7, October.
    4. Kim Darby & Marvin T. Batte & Stan Ernst & Brian Roe, 2008. "Decomposing Local: A Conjoint Analysis of Locally Produced Foods," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(2), pages 476-486.
    5. Walisinghe, B.R & Gunaratne, L.H.P., 2008. "Consumer Preferences for Quality Attributes of Rice: A Conjoint Analysis," Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics, Sri Lanka Agricultural Economics Association (SAEA), vol. 10, pages 1-13.
    6. Claudia Nyarko Mensah & Lamini Dauda & Kofi Baah Boamah & Muhammad Salman, 2021. "One district one factory policy of Ghana, a transition to a low-carbon habitable economy?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 703-721, January.
    7. Kelvin J. Lancaster, 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(2), pages 132-132.
    8. Ayeduvor, Selorm, 2018. "Assessing quality attributes that drive preference and consumption of local rice in Ghana," GSSP working papers 48, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Apri Wahyudi & John K. M. Kuwornu & Endro Gunawan & Avishek Datta & Loc T. Nguyen, 2019. "Factors Influencing the Frequency of Consumers’ Purchases of Locally-Produced Rice in Indonesia: A Poisson Regression Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2015. "Control Function Methods in Applied Econometrics," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 50(2), pages 420-445.
    11. Ragasa, Catherine & Dankyi, Awere & Acheampong, Patricia & Wiredu, Alexander Nimo & Chapoto, Antony & Asamoah, Marian & Tripp, Robert, 2013. "Patterns of adoption of improved rice technologies in Ghana:," GSSP working papers 35, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Dalton, Timothy J., 2004. "A household hedonic model of rice traits: economic values from farmers in West Africa," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(2-3), pages 149-159, December.
    13. Kofi K. Boateng & George Y. Obeng & Ebenezer Mensah, 2017. "Rice Cultivation and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Review and Conceptual Framework with Reference to Ghana," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Rivers, Douglas & Vuong, Quang H., 1988. "Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 347-366, November.
    15. Greene,William H. & Hensher,David A., 2010. "Modeling Ordered Choices," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521194204, September.
    16. Stefan J Meyer, 2016. "Obesity and Health-Care Costs in Switzerland: Dealing with Endogeneity in Non-Linear Regression Models," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 152(III), pages 243-286, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Awal Abdul‐Rahaman & Awudu Abdulai, 2020. "Vertical coordination mechanisms and farm performance amongst smallholder rice farmers in northern Ghana," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 259-280, April.
    2. Illichmann, R. & Abdulai, A., 2014. "Analysis of Consumer Preferences and Wilingness-To-Pay for Organic Food Products in Germany," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 49, March.
    3. Caroline Krafft, 2020. "Why is fertility on the rise in Egypt? The role of women’s employment opportunities," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 1173-1218, October.
    4. Ahmad Adeel & Bruno Notteboom & Ansar Yasar & Kris Scheerlinck & Jeroen Stevens, 2021. "Sustainable Streetscape and Built Environment Designs around BRT Stations: A Stated Choice Experiment Using 3D Visualizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Dufour, Jean-Marie, 2020. "Exogeneity tests, incomplete models, weak identification and non-Gaussian distributions: Invariance and finite-sample distributional theory," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 390-418.
    6. Caroline Roussy & Aude Ridier & Karim Chaïb, 2014. "Adoption d’innovations par les agriculteurs : rôle des perceptions et des préférences," Post-Print hal-01123427, HAL.
    7. Li, Jiajia & Li, Houjian, 2022. "Spiritual support or living support: Which alleviates solid fuel use for rural households in ethnical minority regions of China?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 479-491.
    8. Liverpool-Tasie, Saweda & Nuhu, Ahmed Salim & Awokuse, Titus O. & Jayne, Thomas S. & Muyanga, Milu & Aromolaran, Adebayo & Adelaja, Adesoji, 2020. "Spillover effects of Medium-Scale Farms on Smallholder Behavior and Welfare: Evidence from Nigeria," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304606, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Erjon Nexhipi, 2022. "The difference in consumer attitudes of locally grown apples with imported apples. the case of Korca Region, Albania:," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 37(1), pages 250-264, November.
    10. Meressa, Abrha Megos & Navrud, Stale, 2020. "Not my cup of coffee: Farmers’ preferences for coffee variety traits – Lessons for crop breeding in the age of climate change," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(3), December.
    11. Biancamaria Torquati & Giulia Giacchè & Tiziano Tempesta, 2020. "Landscapes and Services in Peri-Urban Areas and Choice of Housing Location: An Application of Discrete Choice Experiments," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Thomas E. Guerrero & C. Angelo Guevara & Elisabetta Cherchi & Juan de Dios Ortúzar, 2021. "Addressing endogeneity in strategic urban mode choice models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 2081-2102, August.
    13. Panchalingam, Thadchaigeni & Howard, Gregory & Allen Klaiber, H. & Roe, Brian E., 2023. "Food choice behavior of adolescents under parent-child interaction in the context of US school lunch programs," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    14. Edmeades, Svetlana, 2006. "Varieties, Attributes and Marketed Surplus of a Subsistence Crop: Bananas in Uganda," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25654, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Wilko Letterie & Øivind A. Nilsen, 2022. "Pricing Behaviour and Menu Costs in Multi‐product Firms," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(355), pages 746-769, July.
    16. Zoungrana, Amelie, 2022. "Income diversification and food security:evidence from Burkina Faso," MPRA Paper 112337, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Aniseh S. Bro & Daniel C. Clay & David L. Ortega & Maria C. Lopez, 2019. "Determinants of adoption of sustainable production practices among smallholder coffee producers in Nicaragua," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 895-915, April.
    18. Skreli, Engjell & Imami, Drini, 2012. "Analyzing Consumers’ Preferences for Apple Attributes in Tirana, Albania," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Sarrias, Mauricio, 2021. "A two recursive equation model to correct for endogeneity in latent class binary probit models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    20. William Liu, 2023. "A Theory Guide to Using Control Functions to Instrument Hazard Models," Papers 2312.03165, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:2:y:2022:i:12:d:10.1007_s43546-022-00372-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.