IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v68y2016i3d10.1007_s41471-016-0014-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Datenzentrische Geschäftsmodelle als neuer Geschäftsmodelltypus in der Electronic-Business-Forschung: Konzeptionelle Bezugspunkte, Klassifikation und Geschäftsmodellarchitektur

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Dorfer

    (Universität Siegen)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Der vorliegende Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit dem emergenten Phänomen der datenzentrischen Geschäftsmodelle: Diese bezeichnen einen Internet-Geschäftsmodelltypus, der die Sammlung, Verarbeitung und Bereitstellung von Daten in Form von Datengütern zum Gegenstand hat. Ziel der Untersuchung ist es, einen konzeptionellen Beitrag zu diesem bisher nur rudimentär erforschten Forschungsfeld zu leisten, um auf diese Weise ein besseres Verstehen und Gestalten dieses Geschäftsmodelltypus zu ermöglichen. Hierfür werden datenzentrische Geschäftsmodelle konzeptionell in die Referenzforschung eingebettet und systematisch mittels einer empirisch gestützten Klassifikation und einer Geschäftsmodellanalyse auf ihre Ausprägungen sowie ihre konstitutiven ökonomischen Merkmale und Strukturen untersucht.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Dorfer, 2016. "Datenzentrische Geschäftsmodelle als neuer Geschäftsmodelltypus in der Electronic-Business-Forschung: Konzeptionelle Bezugspunkte, Klassifikation und Geschäftsmodellarchitektur," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 307-369, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:68:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s41471-016-0014-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s41471-016-0014-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41471-016-0014-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41471-016-0014-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dewenter, Ralf & Rösch, Jürgen & Terschüren, Anna, 2014. "Abgrenzung zweiseitiger Märkte am Beispiel von Internetsuchmaschinen," Working Paper 151/2014, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg.
    2. Jean-Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2003. "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(4), pages 990-1029, June.
    3. Lambert, Susan C. & Davidson, Robyn A., 2013. "Applications of the business model in studies of enterprise success, innovation and classification: An analysis of empirical research from 1996 to 2010," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 668-681.
    4. Giacomo Luchetta, 2014. "Is The Google Platform A Two-Sided Market?," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 185-207.
    5. Geoffrey G. Parker & Marshall W. Van Alstyne, 2005. "Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(10), pages 1494-1504, October.
    6. Amit, Raphael & Zott, Christoph, 2010. "Business model innovation: Creating value in times of change," IESE Research Papers D/870, IESE Business School.
    7. Luchetta, Giacomo, 2013. "The law and economics of intermediaries of personal information," 24th European Regional ITS Conference, Florence 2013 88481, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    8. Morris, Michael & Schindehutte, Minet & Allen, Jeffrey, 2005. "The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 726-735, June.
    9. Marc Rysman, 2009. "The Economics of Two-Sided Markets," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 23(3), pages 125-143, Summer.
    10. Robert C Nickerson & Upkar Varshney & Jan Muntermann, 2013. "A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 336-359, May.
    11. Adamantia G Pateli & George M Giaglis, 2004. "A research framework for analysing eBusiness models," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 302-314, December.
    12. Sarkar, Mitrabarun & Butler, Brian & Steinfield, Charles, 1998. "Cybermediaries in Electronic Marketspace: Toward Theory Building," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 215-221, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junic Kim & Jaewook Yoo, 2019. "Platform Growth Model: The Four Stages of Growth Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Justus Haucap & Torben Stühmeier, 2016. "Competition and antitrust in Internet markets," Chapters, in: Johannes M. Bauer & Michael Latzer (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of the Internet, chapter 9, pages 183-210, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Cristiano Codagnone & Fabienne Abadie & Federico Biagi, 2016. "The Future of Work in the ‘Sharing Economy’. Market Efficiency and Equitable Opportunities or Unfair Precarisation?," JRC Research Reports JRC101280, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    5. Gawer, Annabelle, 2014. "Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1239-1249.
    6. Kevin J. Boudreau & Lars B. Jeppesen, 2015. "Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(12), pages 1761-1777, December.
    7. Saul Estrin & Susanna Khavul & Mike Wright, 2022. "Soft and hard information in equity crowdfunding: network effects in the digitalization of entrepreneurial finance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1761-1781, April.
    8. Bertin Martens & Luis Aguiar & Estrella Gomez Herrera & Frank Muller, 2018. "The digital transformation of news media and the rise of disinformation and fake news," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2018-02, Joint Research Centre.
    9. Marchand, André & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, 2013. "Value Creation in the Video Game Industry: Industry Economics, Consumer Benefits, and Research Opportunities," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 141-157.
    10. Daniel Arce, 2023. "Platform break-even market share," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 713-725, December.
    11. Liu, He & Li, Xuerong & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of platform research: Developing the research agenda for platforms, the associated technologies and social impacts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    12. Pieter Gautier & Bo Hu & Makoto Watanabe, 2023. "Marketmaking Middlemen," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 54(1), pages 83-103, March.
    13. Satish Nambisan & Shaker A. Zahra & Yadong Luo, 2019. "Global platforms and ecosystems: Implications for international business theories," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(9), pages 1464-1486, December.
    14. Bruno Jullien & Alessandro Pavan & Marc Rysman, 2021. "Two-sided markets, pricing, and network effects," Post-Print hal-03828345, HAL.
    15. Esther Gal-Or & Qiaoni Shi, 2022. "Designing Entry Strategies for Subscription Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7597-7613, October.
    16. Krämer, Jan & Wohlfarth, Michael, 2018. "Market power, regulatory convergence, and the role of data in digital markets," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 154-171.
    17. Juha Winter & Sandro Battisti & Thommie Burström & Sakari Luukkainen, 2018. "Exploring the Success Factors of Mobile Business Ecosystems," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Mohammed Mardan & Mark J. Tremblay, 2022. "Network Effects: Betwixt and Between," CESifo Working Paper Series 10082, CESifo.
    19. Lai, Puqing, 2014. "Utilizing the access value of customers," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 61-71.
    20. Tim COWEN & Annabelle GAWER, 2012. "Competition in the Cloud: Unleashing Investment and Innovation Within and Across Platforms," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(85), pages 45-62, 1st quart.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:68:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s41471-016-0014-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.