IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v126y2021i3d10.1007_s11192-020-03824-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A topic network analysis of the system turn in the environmental sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Rabitz

    (Kaunas University of Technology)

  • Alin Olteanu

    (Kaunas University of Technology
    RWTH Aachen University)

  • Jurgita Jurkevičienė

    (Kaunas University of Technology)

  • Agnė Budžytė

    (Kaunas University of Technology)

Abstract

The concept of Earth system science denotes a shift in the scientific discourse from disciplinary accounts of isolated components of the global environment towards the holistic and interdisciplinary treatment of their complex, functional interactions. We measure to what extent the environmental scientific literature of the past three decades reflects this system turn. Our initial dataset consists of 133,670 articles published in 95 relevant journals since 1990. We apply a combination of topic modelling and network analysis. Correlated Topic Models identify latent themes (“topics”) in the scientific discourse as well as intertopic correlations. This allows the generation of topic networks and thus the application of network-analytic techniques. We generate and analyze 2 topic networks. The first network focuses on climate linkages in a subset of our corpus consisting only of environmental journals without a climate-specific orientation: as the climate system is constitutional for the notion of Earth system science, a system turn should reflect itself in strong linkages between climate- and non-climate environmental topics. The second network, based on the full dataset, applies community detection to identify broader topical clusters. Here, we expect the system turn to manifest itself in communities with high topical diversity regarding the components of the global environment as well as types of human-nature interactions, rather than reflecting the boundaries between broader research fields. Our results show that climate topics are comparatively weakly connected and less integrated into broader thematic packages than other topics; that linkages frequently reflect conceptual debates rather than functional interactions between substantive environmental components; and that the scientific discourse splits into 4 broader domains, two of those being topically homogeneous and the other two comprising only marginally diverse topics. We conclude that the concept of Earth system science is primarily aspirational in nature rather than reflecting an empirical shift in the structure of the scientific discourse.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Rabitz & Alin Olteanu & Jurgita Jurkevičienė & Agnė Budžytė, 2021. "A topic network analysis of the system turn in the environmental sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2107-2140, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03824-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03824-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-020-03824-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-020-03824-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margaret Roberts & Brandon Stewart & Tingley, Dustin, 2014. "stm: R Package for Structural Topic Models," Working Paper 176291, Harvard University OpenScholar.
    2. Nicolas Gruber & James N. Galloway, 2008. "An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle," Nature, Nature, vol. 451(7176), pages 293-296, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu Huang & Xiang Chen & Yi Zhang & Changtian Wang & Xiaoli Cao & Jiarun Liu, 2022. "Identification of topic evolution: network analytics with piecewise linear representation and word embedding," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5353-5383, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dean Neu & Gregory D. Saxton & Abu S. Rahaman, 2022. "Social Accountability, Ethics, and the Occupy Wall Street Protests," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 17-31, September.
    2. Auguères, Anne-Sophie & Loreau, Michel, 2016. "Biotic regulation of non-limiting nutrient pools and coupling of biogeochemical cycles," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 334(C), pages 1-7.
    3. Xiaochen Lu & Binjie Li & Guangsheng Chen, 2023. "Responses of Soil CO 2 Emission and Tree Productivity to Nitrogen and Phosphorus Additions in a Nitrogen-Rich Subtropical Chinese Fir Plantation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Jie Zhang & Jia Liu & Guilong Li & Meng Wu, 2024. "Screening Potential Nitrification Inhibitors through a Structure–Activity Relationship Study—The Case of Cinnamic Acid Derivatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Huang, Suo & Bartlett, Paul & Arain, M. Altaf, 2016. "An analysis of global terrestrial carbon, water and energy dynamics using the carbon–nitrogen coupled CLASS-CTEMN+ model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 336(C), pages 36-56.
    6. L.J. Li & D.H. Zeng & R. Mao & Z.Y. Yu, 2012. "Nitrogen and phosphorus resorption of Artemisia scoparia, Chenopodium acuminatum, Cannabis sativa, and Phragmites communis under nitrogen and phosphorus additions in a semiarid grassland, China," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(10), pages 446-451.
    7. Max Nathan & Anna Rosso, 2017. "Innovative events," Development Working Papers 429, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano, revised 08 Apr 2019.
    8. Andreas Rehs, 2020. "A structural topic model approach to scientific reorientation of economics and chemistry after German reunification," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1229-1251, November.
    9. David Ardia & Keven Bluteau & Kris Boudt & Koen Inghelbrecht, 2020. "Climate change concerns and the performance of green versus brown stocks," Working Paper Research 395, National Bank of Belgium.
    10. Zhen-Zhen Zheng & Li-Wei Zheng & Min Nina Xu & Ehui Tan & David A. Hutchins & Wenchao Deng & Yao Zhang & Dalin Shi & Minhan Dai & Shuh-Ji Kao, 2020. "Substrate regulation leads to differential responses of microbial ammonia-oxidizing communities to ocean warming," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Qingsong Guan & Yiqiao Zhou & Shuo Li & Fan Yang & Rentao Liu, 2024. "Denitrification and Anammox and Feammox in the Yinchuan Yellow River wetland," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(11), pages 731-738.
    12. Pavelkova, Andrea, 2022. "The ECB press conference: a textual analysis," Working Paper Series 2742, European Central Bank.
    13. Douglas, Niall Edward, 2008. "Modelling the Costs of Climate Change and its Costs of Mitigation: A Scientific Approach," MPRA Paper 13650, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Ola G. El‐Taliawi & Nihit Goyal & Michael Howlett, 2021. "Holding out the promise of Lasswell's dream: Big data analytics in public policy research and teaching," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(6), pages 640-660, November.
    15. E. Harris & L. Yu & Y-P. Wang & J. Mohn & S. Henne & E. Bai & M. Barthel & M. Bauters & P. Boeckx & C. Dorich & M. Farrell & P. B. Krummel & Z. M. Loh & M. Reichstein & J. Six & M. Steinbacher & N. S., 2022. "Warming and redistribution of nitrogen inputs drive an increase in terrestrial nitrous oxide emission factor," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Xieling Chen & Juan Chen & Gary Cheng & Tao Gong, 2020. "Topics and trends in artificial intelligence assisted human brain research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, April.
    17. Huang, Suo & Bartlett, Paul & Arain, M. Altaf, 2016. "Assessing nitrogen controls on carbon, water and energy exchanges in major plant functional types across North America using a carbon and nitrogen coupled ecosystem model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 12-27.
    18. Faith M. Hartley & Aaron E. Maxwell & Rick E. Landenberger & Zachary J. Bortolot, 2022. "Forest Type Differentiation Using GLAD Phenology Metrics, Land Surface Parameters, and Machine Learning," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Geshere Abdisa Gurmesa & Ang Wang & Shanlong Li & Shushi Peng & Wim Vries & Per Gundersen & Philippe Ciais & Oliver L. Phillips & Erik A. Hobbie & Weixing Zhu & Knute Nadelhoffer & Yi Xi & Edith Bai &, 2022. "Retention of deposited ammonium and nitrate and its impact on the global forest carbon sink," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Haoyu Jin & Chao Zhang & Siyu Meng & Qin Wang & Xiaokun Ding & Ling Meng & Yunyun Zhuang & Xiaohong Yao & Yang Gao & Feng Shi & Thomas Mock & Huiwang Gao, 2024. "Atmospheric deposition and river runoff stimulate the utilization of dissolved organic phosphorus in coastal seas," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03824-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.