IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v110y2017i2d10.1007_s11192-016-2195-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using text mining techniques for identifying research gaps and priorities: a case study of the environmental science in Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Rabiei

    (Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc)
    Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST))

  • Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh

    (Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST))

  • Abdorrahman Haeri

    (Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST))

Abstract

This study aims to observe the researchers’ behavior in Iranian scientific databases to determine the research gaps and priorities in their field of research. Text mining and natural language processing techniques were used to identify what researchers are looking for and to analyze existing research works. In this paper, the information about the behavior of researchers who work in the field of environmental science and existing research works in the Iranian scientific database are processed. The search trends in all areas are evaluated by analyzing the users’ search data. The trend analysis indicates that in the period of February 2013 to July 2015, the growth of the researchers’ requests in some domains of the environment such as Industry, Training, Assessment, Material, Water and Pollution was 1.5 up to 2 times more than the overall requests. A Combination of the trend analysis and clustering of queries led to shaping four priority zones. Then, the research priorities for each environmental research area were determined. The results show that Training, Pollution, Rangeland, Management and Law are those domains in the environmental research which have the most research gaps in Iran, but there are enough research in Forest, Soil and Industry domains. At the end, we describe the steps for the implementation of a decision support system in environmental research management. Researchers, managers and policy makers can use this proposed “research demand and supply monitoring” system or RDSM to make appropriate decisions and allocate their resources more efficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Rabiei & Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh & Abdorrahman Haeri, 2017. "Using text mining techniques for identifying research gaps and priorities: a case study of the environmental science in Iran," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 815-842, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:110:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2195-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2195-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-016-2195-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-016-2195-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gorjian, Shiva & Ghobadian, Barat, 2015. "Solar desalination: A sustainable solution to water crisis in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 571-584.
    2. B. S. Kademani & Anil Sagar & Ganesh Surwase & K. Bhanumurthy, 2013. "Publication trends in materials science: a global perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(3), pages 1275-1295, March.
    3. Meen Chul Kim & Chaomei Chen, 2015. "A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in recommendation systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(1), pages 239-263, July.
    4. Hsu-Hao Tsai, 2011. "Research trends analysis by comparing data mining and customer relationship management through bibliometric methodology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(3), pages 425-450, June.
    5. Xin Gu & Karen L. Blackmore, 2016. "Recent trends in academic journal growth," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(2), pages 693-716, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danuta Piróg & Joanna Fidelus-Orzechowska & Łukasz Wiejaczka, 2022. "Local Authority vs Community Visions of Dam Project Land Development: a Text Mining Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(6), pages 1833-1848, April.
    2. Abdorrahman Haeri, 2020. "Analyzing safety level and recognizing flaws of commercial centers through data mining approach," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 512-526, June.
    3. Xiaolong Xue & Liang Wang & Rebecca J. Yang, 2018. "Exploring the science of resilience: critical review and bibliometric analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(1), pages 477-510, January.
    4. Rongjiang Cai & Tao Lv & Xu Deng, 2021. "Evaluation of Environmental Information Disclosure of Listed Companies in China’s Heavy Pollution Industries: A Text Mining-Based Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Dejian & Xu, Chao, 2017. "Mapping research on carbon emissions trading: a co-citation analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1314-1322.
    2. Hsia-Ching Chang, 2016. "The Synergy of Scientometric Analysis and Knowledge Mapping with Topic Models: Modelling the Development Trajectories of Information Security and Cyber-Security Research," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 1-33, December.
    3. Ana Teresa Santos & Sandro Mendonça, 2022. "Do papers (really) match journals’ “aims and scope”? A computational assessment of innovation studies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7449-7470, December.
    4. Rouzaneh, Davoud & Yazdanpanah, Masoud & Jahromi, Arman Bakhshi, 2021. "Evaluating micro-irrigation system performance through assessment of farmers' satisfaction: implications for adoption, longevity, and water use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    5. Gabriele Sampagnaro, 2023. "Keyword occurrences and journal specialization," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(10), pages 5629-5645, October.
    6. Robertson, Jeandri & Pitt, Leyland & Ferreira, Caitlin, 2020. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the public sector: A bibliographic analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Jabłońska-Sabuka, Matylda & Sitarz, Robert & Kraslawski, Andrzej, 2014. "Forecasting research trends using population dynamics model with Burgers’ type interaction," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 111-122.
    8. Liu, Meijun & Hu, Xiao & Wang, Yuandi & Shi, Dongbo, 2018. "Survive or perish: Investigating the life cycle of academic journals from 1950 to 2013 using survival analysis methods," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 344-364.
    9. Setareh Boshrouei Shargh & Mostafa Zandieh & Ashkan Ayough & Farbod Farhadi, 2024. "Scheduling in services: a review and bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 754-783, June.
    10. Chao Zhang & Jiancheng Guan, 2017. "How to identify metaknowledge trends and features in a certain research field? Evidences from innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1177-1197, November.
    11. Zait, Adriana, 2020. "Academic Publishing – An Annotated Inventory of Challenges and chosen Pathways," MPRA Paper 116499, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 25 Oct 2020.
    12. Hadi Rostamzadeh & Saeed Rostami & Majid Amidpour & Weifeng He & Dong Han, 2021. "Seawater Desalination via Waste Heat Recovery from Generator of Wind Turbines: How Economical Is It to Use a Hybrid HDH-RO Unit?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-40, July.
    13. Keungoui Kim & Dieter F. Kogler & Sira Maliphol, 2024. "Identifying interdisciplinary emergence in the science of science: combination of network analysis and BERTopic," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Danielle H. Lee, 2019. "Predictive power of conference-related factors on citation rates of conference papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 281-304, January.
    15. Slocum, Alexander H. & Gessel, David J., 2022. "Evolving from a hydrocarbon-based to a sustainable economy: Starting with a case study for Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Jianhua Hou & Xiucai Yang & Chaomei Chen, 2018. "Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(2), pages 869-892, May.
    17. Xin Gu & Karen Blackmore, 2017. "Characterisation of academic journals in the digital age," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1333-1350, March.
    18. Ali Babaeebazaz & Shiva Gorjian & Majid Amidpour, 2021. "Integration of a Solar Parabolic Dish Collector with a Small-Scale Multi-Stage Flash Desalination Unit: Experimental Evaluation, Exergy and Economic Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Mary Jane Curry & Theresa Lillis, 2019. "Unpacking the Lore on Multilingual Scholars Publishing in English: A Discussion Paper," Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Dejian Yu, 2015. "A scientometrics review on aggregation operator research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 115-133, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:110:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2195-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.