IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v10y2020i4d10.1134_s2079970520040103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Akademgorodok 2.0 as a Regional Scientific and Innovation Ecosystem: Problems of Formation and Management

Author

Listed:
  • V. E. Seliverstov

    (Center for Strategic Analysis and Planning, Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

— The article discusses the first steps towards implementing the Development Program for the Novosibirsk Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences as a territory with a high concentration of research and development projects (megaproject Akademgorodok 2.0). The author analyzes the results of substantiating the prospects for developing the Novosibirsk Scientific Center in the area called the science polis zone of the Novosibirsk agglomeration. Approaches to constructing scenarios for developing this zone in the unity of socioeconomic, scientific, technological, infrastructural, and urban planning solutions are considered. The layouts of the future Akademgorodok 2.0 for the three considered scenarios are presented. The approaches to establishing the management system in the science polis zone are analyzed (including the one focusing on the Federal Law On innovative scientific and technological centers and on amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation). As an alternative management model, a proposal is formulated to organize the National Science and Technology Corporation for the Development of Siberia as a joint-stock company. It is not only to ensure the effective use of funds allocated for Akademgorodok 2.0 projects but also to address the issues of earning and reproducing the financial resources for these purposes. It is concluded that Akademgorodok 2.0 is among the successful experiences of setting up a regional scientific and innovation ecosystem in Russia. It is shown that integrating the regional strategic planning, territorial planning with modern urban planning solutions, and the planning and management of the scientific and technological development of the territory are fundamentally important for innovation ecosystem’s management system.

Suggested Citation

  • V. E. Seliverstov, 2020. "Akademgorodok 2.0 as a Regional Scientific and Innovation Ecosystem: Problems of Formation and Management," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 454-466, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:10:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1134_s2079970520040103
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970520040103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970520040103
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970520040103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnault Morisson & Mathieu Doussineau, 2019. "Regional innovation governance and place-based policies: design, implementation and implications," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 101-116, January.
    2. Cooke, Philip, 2001. "Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 10(4), pages 945-974, December.
    3. Paul Benneworth & Rómulo Pinheiro & James Karlsen, 2017. "Strategic agency and institutional change: investigating the role of universities in regional innovation systems (RISs)," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 235-248, February.
    4. Larisa Gennadiyevna Karanatova & Anton Yuryevich Kulev, 0. "Modern Approaches to Innovative Ecosystems Formation in the Conditions of Establishing of Knowledge Economy," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 12.
    5. Charles Wessner, 2004. "Entrepreneurship and the Innovation Ecosystem Policy Lessons from the United States," Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy 2004-46, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy Group.
    6. Dominic Power & Anders Malmberg, 2008. "The contribution of universities to innovation and economic development: in what sense a regional problem?," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(2), pages 233-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Jinhee & Lee, Keun, 2022. "Local–global interface as a key factor in the catching up of regional innovation systems: Fast versus slow catching up among Taipei, Shenzhen, and Penang in Asia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Niki Derlukiewicz & Anna Mempel-Sniezyk & Dominika Mankowska, 2021. "Development of Innovation Economy - Activity of Local Government in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 175-195.
    3. Jinhee Kim & Keun Lee, 2022. "Varieties of Regional Innovation Systems around the World and Catch-up by Latecomers," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2219, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2022.
    4. Hiroyuki Okamuro & Junichi Nishimura, 2020. "What Shapes Local Innovation Policies? Empirical Evidence from Japanese Cities," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Chan-Yuan Wong & Keun Lee, 2022. "Evolution of innovation systems of two industrial districts in East Asia: transformation and upgrade from a peripheral system and the role of the core firms, Samsung and TSMC," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 955-990, July.
    6. Cristina Chaminade & Monica Plechero, 2015. "Do Regions Make a Difference? Regional Innovation Systems and Global Innovation Networks in the ICT Industry," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 215-237, February.
    7. Holger Patzelt & Dean A. Shepherd, 2009. "Strategic Entrepreneurship at Universities: Academic Entrepreneurs’ Assessment of Policy Programs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 319-340, January.
    8. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Fabrice Comptour, 2010. "Do clusters generate greater innovation and growth? An analysis of European regions," Working Papers 2010-15, Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA) Ciencias Sociales.
    9. Tomas Karlsson & Caroline Wigren, 2012. "Start-ups among university employees: the influence of legitimacy, human capital and social capital," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 297-312, June.
    10. Dorota Ciołek & Anna Golejewska & Adriana Zabłocka‐Abi Yaghi, 2022. "Innovation drivers in regions. Does urbanization matter?," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 1933-1960, December.
    11. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zhang, Min, 2020. "The cost of weak institutions for innovation in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    12. Doloreux, David & Parto, Saeed, 2005. "Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 133-153.
    13. Ron A. Boschma & Anet B.R. Weterings, 2005. "The effect of regional differences on the performance of software firms in the Netherlands," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(5), pages 567-588, October.
    14. Kudic, Muhamed & Pyka, Andreas & Günther, Jutta, 2012. "Determinants of Evolutionary Change Processes in Innovation Networks – Empirical Evidence from the German Laser Industry," IWH Discussion Papers 7/2012, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    15. Ferretti, Marco & Guerini, Massimiliano & Panetti, Eva & Parmentola, Adele, 2022. "The partner next door? The effect of micro-geographical proximity on intra-cluster inter-organizational relationships," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    16. Ron Boschma & Ron Martin, 2010. "The Aims and Scope of Evolutionary Economic Geography," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Rees, John, 2001. "The Landscapes of Liberty," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 31(2), pages 111-120, Fall.
    18. Emanuela Marrocu & Raffaele Paci & Marco Pontis, 2012. "Intangible capital and firms' productivity," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 21(2), pages 377-402, April.
    19. Quatraro, Francesco & Scandura, Alessandra, 2020. "Regional patterns of unrelated technological diversification: the role of academic inventors," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 202001, University of Turin.
    20. Meng, Rüdiger, 2012. "Räumliche Aspekte der Innovationsförderung: Hintergründe, Perspektiven und Kritik," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Growe, Anna & Heider, Katharina & Lamker, Christian & Paßlick, Sandra & Terfrüchte, Thomas (ed.), Polyzentrale Stadtregionen - Die Region als planerischer Handlungsraum, volume 3, pages 241-254, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:10:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1134_s2079970520040103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.