IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/revepe/v5y2024i3d10.1007_s43253-024-00134-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-production, artificial intelligence and replication: the path of routine dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Leandro Lepratte

    (National Technological University (FRCU-GIDIC))

  • Gabriel Yoguel

    (General Sarmiento National University)

Abstract

The replication has been a relevant issue in the literature on innovation and technological transfer. From these perspectives, replication is not a simple transfer of templates but also the development and diffusion of social and physical technologies. Research on replication has focused on two major interrelated issues. The first analyzes the directionality of the transfer, from a replicator to a replicant, and vice versa. The second pertains to the organizational space of the replication, whether intra-organizational or inter-organizational. Based on these issues, academic contributions have stressed that in replication processes, there are bidirectional interactions and generative processes between technologies, knowledge, skills, and institutions. The study of these interactions is focused on the micro-level analysis of the replication of organizational routines and evinces the replication dilemma. The replication dilemma refers to the relationship between similarity and singularity in the process of replication. In turn, the increasing incorporation of digital technologies such as algorithms of artificial intelligence requires a debate on the role these artifacts play in the replication of algorithmic systems and organizational routines. Based on all these issues, the objective of this article is to analyze how the process of replication emerges from a co-production of technological solutions (TS) in which artificial intelligence artifacts are interrelated with firms and institutions. Therefore, our perspective goes beyond the studies on transfer that emphasize the linear and unidirectional replicator-replicant relationship in the process of replication. By adopting this approach, we deepen the analysis of co-production processes that involve various types of actors, artifacts, and routines. This article focuses on two in-depth cases of technology transfer processes where the co-production and replication of routines related to AI-based technological solutions give rise to positive feedback, emergent properties, and innovation process. The discussion focuses on theoretical-methodological issues and innovation policy proposals. Three related key points about replication theory and the adoption of TS based on AI in different organizational contexts can be identified from this article. First, the micro-organizational processes of replication considered in this article contribute to a greater understanding of the dilemma between similarity and singularity. Second, the replication processes of TS based on AI should be understood from the co-production and emergence of innovations between routine dynamics and artifacts. Third, there are differences in the replication processes of TS based on AI depending on whether they are inter-organizational or intra-organizational.

Suggested Citation

  • Leandro Lepratte & Gabriel Yoguel, 2024. "Co-production, artificial intelligence and replication: the path of routine dynamics," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 535-558, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:revepe:v:5:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s43253-024-00134-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s43253-024-00134-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43253-024-00134-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43253-024-00134-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 803-815.
    2. Giada Baldessarelli & Nathalie Lazaric & Michele Pezzoni, 2022. "Organizational routines: Evolution in the research landscape of two core communities," Post-Print halshs-03718851, HAL.
    3. D'Adderio, Luciana & Pollock, Neil, 2020. "Making routines the same: Crafting similarity and singularity in routines transfer," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    4. Isabel Almudi & Francisco Fatas-Villafranca, 2018. "Promotion and Coevolutionary Dynamics in Contemporary Capitalism," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 80-102, January.
    5. Nelson, Richard R. & Sampat, Bhaven N., 2001. "Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 31-54, January.
    6. Sidney G. Winter & Gabriel Szulanski, 2001. "Replication as Strategy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(6), pages 730-743, December.
    7. Patrick Cohendet & Patrick Llerena, 2003. "Routines and incentives: the role of communities in the firm," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 12(2), pages 271-297, April.
    8. Martha S. Feldman & Brian T. Pentland & Luciana D’Adderio & Nathalie Lazaric, 2016. "Beyond Routines as Things: Introduction to the Special Issue on Routine Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 505-513, June.
    9. Geoffrey Hodgson & Thorbjørn Knudsen, 2004. "The firm as an interactor: firms as vehicles for habits and routines," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 281-307, July.
    10. Szulanski, Gabriel & Jensen, Robert J., 2008. "Growing through copying: The negative consequences of innovation on franchise network growth," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1732-1741, December.
    11. Verónica Robert & Gabriel Yoguel, 2022. "Exploration of trending concepts in innovation policy," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 259-292, July.
    12. Alaimo, Cristina & Kallinikos, Jannis, 2022. "Organizations decentered: data objects, technology and knowledge," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112470, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Mark Knell, 2021. "The digital revolution and digitalized network society," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 9-25, April.
    14. Martha S. Feldman, 2000. "Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(6), pages 611-629, December.
    15. Giada Baldessarelli & Nathalie Lazaric & Michele Pezzoni, 2022. "Organizational routines: Evolution in the research landscape of two core communities," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1119-1154, September.
    16. Geoffrey M Hodgson, 2023. "How stable routines can empower varied behaviors: defining routines as organizational capacities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(6), pages 1319-1332.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Charles Sheldon & Eric Michael Laviolette & Fabien Geuser, 2020. "Explaining the process and effects of new routine introduction with a notion of micro-level entrepreneurship," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 609-642, July.
    2. Roberto Grandinetti, 2022. "A Routine-Based Theory of Routine Replication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Davies, Andrew & Frederiksen, Lars & Cacciatori, Eugenia & Hartmann, Andreas, 2018. "The long and winding road: Routine creation and replication in multi-site organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1403-1417.
    4. Andrea Furlan & Roberto Grandinetti, 2018. "Can routines be inherited? A microfoundational approach to spinoffs," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0217, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    5. Schmidt, Heiko M. & Santamaria-Alvarez, Sandra Milena, 2022. "Routines in International Business: A semi-systematic review of the concept," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(2).
    6. Agnès Festré & Nathalie Lazaric, 2007. "Routines and leadership in Schumpeter and von Mises' analysis of economic change," Post-Print halshs-00271338, HAL.
    7. Aura Parmentier-Cajaiba & Nathalie Lazaric & Giovany Cajaiba-Santana, 2021. "The effortful process of routines emergence: the interplay of entrepreneurial actions and artefacts," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 33-63, January.
    8. Nathalie Lazaric, 2021. "Cognition and Routine Dynamics," Post-Print halshs-03402421, HAL.
    9. Patrick Sailer & Georg Josef Loscher & Stephan Kaiser, 2024. "Coordinated Interdependence: How Patterning Governs Flexibility in a Routine Cluster," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1884-1915, July.
    10. Luciana D’Adderio, 2014. "The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routine Transfer," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1325-1350, October.
    11. Becker, Markus C. & Zirpoli, Francesco, 2008. "Applying organizational routines in analyzing the behavior of organizations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 128-148, April.
    12. Kandora Marcin, 2018. "Managing Reverse Knowledge Flows in Routine Replication Programs: The Case of Global Manufacturing ERP Template Rollout," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 26(2), pages 47-75, June.
    13. Gilstrap, J. Bruce & Hart, Timothy A., 2020. "How employee behaviors effect organizational change and stability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 120-131.
    14. Geoffrey Hodgson & Thorbjørn Knudsen, 2006. "The nature and units of social selection," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 477-489, December.
    15. Wolfgang H. Güttel & Stefan Konlechner & Barbara Müller, 2012. "Entscheidungsmuster und Veränderungsarchitekturen in Wandelprozessen: Eine Dynamic Capabilities-Perspektive," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 630-654, September.
    16. Scott Sonenshein, 2016. "Routines and Creativity: From Dualism to Duality," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 739-758, June.
    17. repec:hal:gemwpa:hal-00864332 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Markus Becker & Thorbjorn Knudsen, 2012. "Nelson and Winter Revisited," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Shad Morris & Scott Snell & Ingmar Björkman, 2016. "An architectural framework for global talent management," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 47(6), pages 723-747, August.
    20. Joseph Lampel & Jamal Shamsie & Zur Shapira, 2009. "Experiencing the Improbable: Rare Events and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 835-845, October.
    21. Esther Tippmann & Pamela Sharkey Scott & Vincent Mangematin, 2014. "Stimulating Knowledge Search Routines and Architecture Competences: The Role of Organizational Context and Middle Management," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00864332, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Replication; Innovation; Routine dynamics; Organization; Artificial intelligence; Co-production;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • L8 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:revepe:v:5:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s43253-024-00134-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.