IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/queues/v92y2019i1d10.1007_s11134-019-09608-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information heterogeneity in a retrial queue: throughput and social welfare maximization

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongbin Wang

    (Beijing Jiaotong University)

  • Jinting Wang

    (Beijing Jiaotong University)

Abstract

We consider an M/M/1 queue with retrials. There are two streams of customers, one informed about the server’s state upon arrival (idle or busy) and the other not informed. Both informed and uninformed customers decide whether to join the system or not upon arrival. Upon joining, customers who are faced with a busy server will retry several times until the server is idle to acquire service. The interval of retrials is exponentially distributed. We investigate equilibrium strategies for the customers and study the impact of information heterogeneity on the system throughput and social welfare. We find that social welfare is increasing in the fraction of informed customers and the maximum social welfare is reached when all customers are informed about the state of the server. On the other hand, we find that when the workload is low (or high), the throughput-maximizing server should conceal (or disclose) the state of the server to customers. When the workload falls in an intermediate range, information heterogeneity in the population (i.e., revealing the information to a certain portion of customers) leads to more efficient outcomes. Finally, numerical analyses are presented to verify our results and illustrate the impact of the retrial behavior on the system performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongbin Wang & Jinting Wang, 2019. "Information heterogeneity in a retrial queue: throughput and social welfare maximization," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 131-172, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:92:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11134-019-09608-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11134-019-09608-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11134-019-09608-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11134-019-09608-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonis Economou & Spyridoula Kanta, 2011. "Equilibrium customer strategies and social–profit maximization in the single‐server constant retrial queue," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(2), pages 107-122, March.
    2. Hong Chen & Murray Frank, 1995. "Monopoly Pricing When Customers Queue," Industrial Organization 9504001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Noah Gans & Ger Koole & Avishai Mandelbaum, 2003. "Telephone Call Centers: Tutorial, Review, and Research Prospects," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 79-141, September.
    4. Pengfei Guo & Paul Zipkin, 2007. "Analysis and Comparison of Queues with Different Levels of Delay Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 962-970, June.
    5. Refael Hassin & Ricky Roet-Green, 2017. "The Impact of Inspection Cost on Equilibrium, Revenue, and Social Welfare in a Single-Server Queue," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 804-820, June.
    6. Hassin, Refael, 1986. "Consumer Information in Markets with Random Product Quality: The Case of Queues and Balking," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 54(5), pages 1185-1195, September.
    7. Wang, Jinting & Zhang, Xuelu & Huang, Ping, 2017. "Strategic behavior and social optimization in a constant retrial queue with the N-policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 841-849.
    8. Ward Whitt, 1999. "Improving Service by Informing Customers About Anticipated Delays," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 192-207, February.
    9. Naor, P, 1969. "The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 15-24, January.
    10. Shiliang Cui & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2016. "Blind Queues: The Impact of Consumer Beliefs on Revenues and Congestion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(12), pages 3656-3672, December.
    11. Hassin, Refael & Roet-Green, Ricky, 2018. "Cascade equilibrium strategies in a two-server queueing system with inspection cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1014-1026.
    12. Shiliang Cui & Xuanming Su & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2019. "A Model of Rational Retrials in Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1699-1718, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhongbin Wang & Yunan Liu & Lei Fang, 2022. "Pay to activate service in vacation queues," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2609-2627, June.
    2. Sun, Wei & Zhang, Zhiyuan & Xie, Xumeng & Li, Shiyong, 2024. "Heterogeneity of delay information and revenue-cost structure in a multi-server queue with threshold policy: Customer behaviors and optimization," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rouba Ibrahim, 2018. "Sharing delay information in service systems: a literature survey," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 49-79, June.
    2. Opher Baron & Antonis Economou & Athanasia Manou, 2022. "Increasing social welfare with delays: Strategic customers in the M/G/1 orbit queue," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2907-2924, July.
    3. Ming Hu & Yang Li & Jianfu Wang, 2018. "Efficient Ignorance: Information Heterogeneity in a Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2650-2671, June.
    4. Jianfu Wang & Ming Hu, 2020. "Efficient Inaccuracy: User-Generated Information Sharing in a Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4648-4666, October.
    5. Pengfei Guo & Moshe Haviv & Zhenwei Luo & Yulan Wang, 2022. "Optimal queue length information disclosure when service quality is uncertain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 1912-1927, May.
    6. Caner Canyakmaz & Tamer Boyaci, 2018. "Queueing systems with rationally inattentive customers," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-18-04_R1, ESMT European School of Management and Technology, revised 01 Oct 2020.
    7. David Lingenbrink & Krishnamurthy Iyer, 2019. "Optimal Signaling Mechanisms in Unobservable Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1397-1416, September.
    8. Dimitrios Logothetis & Antonis Economou, 2023. "The impact of information on transportation systems with strategic customers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2189-2206, July.
    9. Nur Sunar & Yichen Tu & Serhan Ziya, 2021. "Pooled vs. Dedicated Queues when Customers Are Delay-Sensitive," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3785-3802, June.
    10. Caner Canyakmaz & Tamer Boyaci, 2018. "Opaque queues: Service systems with rationally inattentive customers," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-18-04, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    11. Zhang, Zhe George & Yin, Xiaoling, 2021. "Information and pricing effects in two-tier public service systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    12. Opher Baron & Xiaole Chen & Yang Li, 2023. "Omnichannel Services: The False Premise and Operational Remedies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 865-884, February.
    13. Qiuping Yu & Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo & Seyed Iravani, 2018. "Managing Customer Expectations and Priorities in Service Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3942-3970, August.
    14. Jouini, Oualid & Dallery, Yves & Aksin, Zeynep, 2009. "Queueing models for full-flexible multi-class call centers with real-time anticipated delays," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 389-399, August.
    15. Pengfei Guo & Zhe George Zhang, 2013. "Strategic Queueing Behavior and Its Impact on System Performance in Service Systems with the Congestion-Based Staffing Policy," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 118-131, September.
    16. Kraig Delana & Nicos Savva & Tolga Tezcan, 2021. "Proactive Customer Service: Operational Benefits and Economic Frictions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 70-87, 1-2.
    17. Oualid Jouini & Zeynep Akşin & Yves Dallery, 2011. "Call Centers with Delay Information: Models and Insights," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 534-548, October.
    18. Zeynep Akşin & Barış Ata & Seyed Morteza Emadi & Che-Lin Su, 2013. "Structural Estimation of Callers' Delay Sensitivity in Call Centers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(12), pages 2727-2746, December.
    19. Shiliang Cui & Zhongbin Wang & Luyi Yang, 2020. "The Economics of Line-Sitting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 227-242, January.
    20. Miao Yu & Yu Zhao & Chunguang Chang & Liangliang Sun, 2023. "Fluid models for customer service web chat systems with interactive automated service," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 572-598, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:92:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11134-019-09608-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.