IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v57y2023i2d10.1007_s11135-022-01397-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating and tracking qualitative content coder performance using item response theory

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Hennessy

    (University of Delaware)

  • Amy Bleakley

    (University of Delaware)

  • Morgan E. Ellithorpe

    (University of Delaware)

Abstract

Content analysis of traditional and social media has a central role in investigating features of media content, measuring media exposure, and calculation of media effects. The reliability of content coding is usually evaluated using “kappa-centric” agreement measures, but these measures produce results that aggregate individual coder decisions which obscure the performance of individual coders. Using a data set of 105 advertisements for sports and energy drinks media content coded by five coders, we demonstrate that Item Response Theory can track coder performance over time and give coder-specific information on the consistency of decisions over qualitatively coded objects. We conclude that IRT should be added to content analysts’ tool kit of useful methodologies to track and evaluate content coders’ performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Hennessy & Amy Bleakley & Morgan E. Ellithorpe, 2023. "Evaluating and tracking qualitative content coder performance using item response theory," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1231-1245, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-022-01397-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-022-01397-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-022-01397-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-022-01397-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anton Oleinik & Irina Popova & Svetlana Kirdina & Tatyana Shatalova, 2014. "On the choice of measures of reliability and validity in the content-analysis of texts," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2703-2718, September.
    2. Singh, Jagdip, 2004. "Tackling measurement problems with Item Response Theory: Principles, characteristics, and assessment, with an illustrative example," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 184-208, February.
    3. Bleakley, Amy & Ellithorpe, Morgan E. & Hennessy, Michael & Jamieson, Patrick E. & Khurana, Atika & Weitz, Ilana, 2017. "Risky movies, risky behaviors, and ethnic identity among Black adolescents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 131-137.
    4. Sickar, Michael J. & Highhouse, Scott, 1998. "Looking Closer at the Effects of Framing on Risky Choice: An Item Response Theory Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 75-91, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Jiménez Alcarria & Jorge Tuñón Navarro, 2024. "Stakeholders and impact (engagement) in EU digital communication strategies during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Aloysius, John A., 2003. "Rational escalation of costs by playing a sequence of unfavorable gambles: the martingale," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 111-129, May.
    3. Salzberger, Thomas & Newton, Fiona J. & Ewing, Michael T., 2014. "Detecting gender item bias and differential manifest response behavior: A Rasch-based solution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 598-607.
    4. Leonard Paas & Klaas Sijtsma, 2008. "Nonparametric item response theory for investigating dimensionality of marketing scales: A SERVQUAL application," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 157-170, June.
    5. Savastano Marco & Anagnoste Sorin, 2020. "Pioneering Strategies in Retail Settings: An Empirical Study of Successful Practices," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(4), pages 643-663, December.
    6. Salzberger, Thomas & Koller, Monika, 2013. "Towards a new paradigm of measurement in marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1307-1317.
    7. Kuhberger, Anton & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael & Perner, Josef, 1999. "The Effects of Framing, Reflection, Probability, and Payoff on Risk Preference in Choice Tasks, ," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 204-231, June.
    8. Anton Oleinik, 2015. "On content analysis of images of mass protests: a case of data triangulation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 2203-2220, September.
    9. de Jong, M.G., 2006. "Response bias in international marketing research," Other publications TiSEM 5d4031be-97b5-4db3-962b-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Salim Moussa, 2016. "A two-step item response theory procedure for a better measurement of marketing constructs," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 28-50, March.
    11. Anton Oleinik, 2024. "A Bayesian index of association: comparison with other measures and performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 277-305, February.
    12. Vanderleia Martins Lohn & Rafael Tezza & Graziela Dias Alperstedt & Lucila M. S. Campos, 2017. "Future Professionals: A Study of Sustainable Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Chih-Hsing Liu & Jeou-Shyan Horng & Sheng-Fang Chou & Tai-Yi Yu & Yung-Chuan Huang & Jun-You Lin, 2023. "Integrating big data and marketing concepts into tourism, hospitality operations and strategy development," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1905-1922, April.
    14. Jan Ketil Arnulf & Kai R. Larsen & Øyvind L. Martinsen, 2018. "Respondent Robotics: Simulating Responses to Likert-Scale Survey Items," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(1), pages 21582440187, March.
    15. Dirk Temme & Lutz Hildebrandt, 2009. "Gruppenvergleiche bei hypothetischen Konstrukten — Die Prüfung der Übereinstimmung von Messmodellen mit der Strukturgleichungsmethodik," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 138-185, March.
    16. Knoppen, Desirée & Saris, Willem & Moncagatta, Paolo, 2022. "Absorptive capacity dimensions and the measurement of cumulativeness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 312-324.
    17. Maud Dampérat & Ping Lei & Florence Jeannot, 2019. "IRT Approach for rating scales: applications for normal and non-normal distributions," Post-Print hal-04325043, HAL.
    18. Hergesell, Anja, 2022. "Using Rasch analysis for scale development and refinement in tourism: Theory and illustration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 551-561.
    19. Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy & Carter, Patrick & Blair, Edward, 2001. "Attribute Framing and Goal Framing Effects in Health Decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 382-399, July.
    20. Liu, Jing & Lin, Hua & Hu, Bing & Zhou, Zixiong & Agyeiwaah, Elizabeth & Xu, Ye, 2022. "Advancing the understanding of the resident pro-tourism behavior scale: An integration of item response theory and classical test theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 113-125.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-022-01397-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.