IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v50y2016i2p767-790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in questionnaire analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Donata Marasini
  • Piero Quatto
  • Enrico Ripamonti

Abstract

Fuzzy sets represent an extension of the concept of set, used to mathematically model veiled and indefinite concepts, such as those of youth, poverty, customer satisfaction and so on. Fuzzy theory introduces a membership function, expressing the degree of membership of the elements to a set. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets and hesitant fuzzy sets are two extensions of the theory of fuzzy sets, in which non-membership degrees and hesitations expressed by a set of experts are, respectively, introduced. In this paper, we apply intuitionistic fuzzy sets to questionnaire analysis, with a focus on the construction of membership, non-membership and uncertainty functions. We also suggest the possibility of considering intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets as a valuable theoretical framework. We apply these models to the evaluation of a Public Administration and we assess our results through a sensitivity analysis. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Suggested Citation

  • Donata Marasini & Piero Quatto & Enrico Ripamonti, 2016. "Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in questionnaire analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 767-790, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:50:y:2016:i:2:p:767-790
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-015-0175-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-015-0175-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-015-0175-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    2. Corrado Crocetta & Giuseppe Delvecchio, 2007. "A Fuzzy Measure of Satisfaction for University Education as a Key for Employment," Springer Books, in: Luigi Fabbris (ed.), Effectiveness of University Education in Italy, pages 11-27, Springer.
    3. D'Elia, Angela & Piccolo, Domenico, 2005. "A mixture model for preferences data analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 917-934, June.
    4. Castillo, C. & Lorenzana, T., 2010. "Evaluation Of Business Scenarios By Means Of Composite Indicators," Fuzzy Economic Review, International Association for Fuzzy-set Management and Economy (SIGEF), vol. 0(1), pages 3-20, May.
    5. Soondool Chung & Hyeji Choi & Sophia Lee, 2014. "Measuring Social Capital in the Republic of Korea with Mixed Methods: Application of Factor Analysis and Fuzzy-Set Ideal Type Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 45-64, May.
    6. Harvey Goldstein & Jon Rasbash & William Browne & Geoffrey Woodhouse & Michel Poulain, 2000. "Multilevel Models in the Study of Dynamic Household Structures," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 16(4), pages 373-387, December.
    7. Michelle Lalla & Gisella Facchinetti & Giovanni Mastroleo, 2005. "Ordinal scales and fuzzy set systems to measure agreement: An application to the evaluation of teaching activity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 38(5), pages 577-601, January.
    8. Cleriston Silva & Deise Araújo Batista & Denise Medeiros, 2014. "A proposed method to evaluate the quality of services using Fuzzy sets theory," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 871-885, March.
    9. Gianni Betti & Antonella D’Agostino & Laura Neri, 2011. "Educational Mismatch of Graduates: a Multidimensional and Fuzzy Indicator," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 465-480, September.
    10. Meimei Xia & Zeshui Xu & Na Chen, 2013. "Some Hesitant Fuzzy Aggregation Operators with Their Application in Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 259-279, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Atiq-ur Rehman & Mustanser Hussain & Adeel Farooq & Muhammad Akram, 2019. "Consensus-Based Multi-Person Decision Making with Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations Using Product Transitivity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Donata Marasini & Piero Quatto & Enrico Ripamonti, 2017. "Inferential confidence intervals for fuzzy analysis of teaching satisfaction," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1513-1529, July.
    3. Juan Carlos Martín & Alessandro Indelicato, 2023. "A fuzzy-hybrid analysis of citizens’ perception toward immigrants in Europe," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1101-1124, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Palash Dutta & Rupjit Saikia, 2020. "A Decision-making Approach for Choosing a Reliable Product under the Hesitant Fuzzy Environment via a Novel Distance Measure," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 45(3), pages 147-159, September.
    2. Muhammad Akram & Maham Arshad, 2019. "A Novel Trapezoidal Bipolar Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Group Decision-Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 565-584, June.
    3. E. Nardo & R. Simone, 2019. "A model-based fuzzy analysis of questionnaires," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(2), pages 187-215, June.
    4. Carmen Lozano & Cesaire Chiatchoua, 2022. "Conditions Influencing Salary of the Automotive Industry in Mexico City—A Linguistic Fuzzy-Set Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Vuciterna, Rina & Thomsen, Michael & Popp, Jennie & Musliu, Arben, 2017. "Efficiency and Competitiveness of Kosovo Raspberry Producers," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252770, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    6. Gourav Gupta & Shivani & Deepika Rani, 2024. "Neutrosophic goal programming approach for multi-objective fixed-charge transportation problem with neutrosophic parameters," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(3), pages 1274-1300, September.
    7. Berna Tektas Sivrikaya & Ferhan Cebi & Hasan Hüseyin Turan & Nihat Kasap & Dursun Delen, 2017. "A fuzzy long-term investment planning model for a GenCo in a hybrid electricity market considering climate change impacts," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 975-991, October.
    8. Collan, Mikael, 2008. "New Method for Real Option Valuation Using Fuzzy Numbers," Working Papers 466, IAMSR, Åbo Akademi.
    9. Kim, Jong Soon & Whang, Kyu-Seung, 1998. "A tolerance approach to the fuzzy goal programming problems with unbalanced triangular membership function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 614-624, June.
    10. Berna Tektaş & Hasan Hüseyin Turan & Nihat Kasap & Ferhan Çebi & Dursun Delen, 2022. "A Fuzzy Prescriptive Analytics Approach to Power Generation Capacity Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    11. Chen, Lisa Y. & Wang, Tien-Chin, 2009. "Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 233-242, July.
    12. Víctor G. Alfaro-García & Anna M. Gil-Lafuente & Gerardo G. Alfaro Calderón, 2017. "A fuzzy approach to a municipality grouping model towards creation of synergies," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 391-408, September.
    13. Aghayi, Nazila & Maleki, Bentolhoda, 2016. "Efficiency measurement of DMUs with undesirable outputs under uncertainty based on the directional distance function: Application on bank industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 376-387.
    14. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    15. de Andres-Sanchez, Jorge, 2007. "Claim reserving with fuzzy regression and Taylor's geometric separation method," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 145-163, January.
    16. Mikhailov, L., 2004. "A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(3), pages 687-704, December.
    17. Hongyi Sun & Bingqian Zhang & Wenbin Ni, 2022. "A Hybrid Model Based on SEM and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Supplier Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Liu, Yong-Jun & Zhang, Wei-Guo, 2015. "A multi-period fuzzy portfolio optimization model with minimum transaction lots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 933-941.
    19. Sakawa, Masatoshi & Kato, Kosuke, 1998. "An interactive fuzzy satisficing method for structured multiobjective linear fractional programs with fuzzy numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 575-589, June.
    20. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:50:y:2016:i:2:p:767-790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.