IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v44y2010i4p749-759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Face validity in personality tests: psychometric instruments and projective techniques in comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Sartori

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Sartori, 2010. "Face validity in personality tests: psychometric instruments and projective techniques in comparison," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 749-759, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:44:y:2010:i:4:p:749-759
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-009-9224-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-009-9224-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-009-9224-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riccardo Sartori & Margherita Pasini, 2007. "Quality and Quantity in Test Validity: How can we be Sure that Psychological Tests Measure what they have to?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 359-374, June.
    2. Samuel Messick, 1998. "Test Validity: A Matter of Consequence," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 35-44, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hermann Frank & Alexander Kessler & Thomas Rusch & Julia Suess–Reyes & Daniela Weismeier–Sammer, 2017. "Capturing the Familiness of Family Businesses: Development of the Family Influence Familiness Scale (FIFS)," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(5), pages 709-742, September.
    2. Riccardo Sartori & Arianna Costantini & Andrea Ceschi & Andrea Scalco, 2017. "Not only correlations: a different approach for investigating the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and job performance based on workers and employees’ perception," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2507-2519, November.
    3. Riccardo Sartori & Andrea Ceschi, 2013. "Assessment and development centers: judgment biases and risks of using idiographic and nomothetic approaches to collecting information on people to be evaluated and trained in organizations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3277-3288, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naomi Watanabe & Susanne A. Denham & Nicole M. Jones & Tessei Kobayashi & Hideko H. Bassett & David E. Ferrier, 2019. "Working Toward Cross-Cultural Adaptation: Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of the Affect Knowledge Test in Japanese Preschoolers," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, May.
    2. Haneen Yassin & Mais Jaradat, 2020. "The Impact of Talent Management on Organizational Effectiveness in Healthcare Sector," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 9(2), pages 535-572, April.
    3. Riccardo Sartori & Arianna Costantini & Andrea Ceschi & Andrea Scalco, 2017. "Not only correlations: a different approach for investigating the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and job performance based on workers and employees’ perception," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2507-2519, November.
    4. Riccardo Sartori & Margherita Pasini, 2007. "Quality and Quantity in Test Validity: How can we be Sure that Psychological Tests Measure what they have to?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 359-374, June.
    5. Martin Guhn & Bruno Zumbo & Magdalena Janus & Clyde Hertzman, 2011. "Validation Theory and Research for a Population-Level Measure of Children’s Development, Wellbeing, and School Readiness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 103(2), pages 183-191, September.
    6. Bader Obeidat & Haneen Yassin & Ra’ed Masa’deh, 2018. "The Effect of Talent Management on Organizational Effectiveness in Healthcare Sector," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(11), pages 1-55, November.
    7. Riccardo Sartori & Andrea Ceschi & Serena Cubico & Giuseppe Favretto, 2014. "Quality and quantity in the construction and validation of a psychological test for the assessment and selection of aspiring volunteer rescuers: the action-research in an Italian health association," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3037-3051, November.
    8. Nathan D. Roberson, 2022. "Multicultural Integration Policy as an Explanatory Factor of Immigrant Social Belonging: Multilevel Evidence for a Multilevel Construct," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 267-284, March.
    9. Michele Sam, 2011. "An Indigenous Knowledges Perspective on Valid Meaning Making: A Commentary on Research with the EDI and Aboriginal Communities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 103(2), pages 315-325, September.
    10. Martin Guhn & Hillel Goelman, 2011. "Bioecological Theory, Early Child Development and the Validation of the Population-Level Early Development Instrument," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 103(2), pages 193-217, September.
    11. Robert Neumann & Peter Graeff, 2010. "A Multitrait-Multimethod approach to pinpoint the validity of aggregated governance indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 849-864, August.
    12. Kenneth Tang, 2015. "Estimating Productivity Costs in Health Economic Evaluations: A Review of Instruments and Psychometric Evidence," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 31-48, January.
    13. Sahar Sabbaghan & Cecil Eng Huang Chua & Lesley A. Gardner, 2020. "Statistical measurement of trees’ similarity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 781-806, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:44:y:2010:i:4:p:749-759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.