IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v87y2022i4d10.1007_s11336-022-09865-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Item Response Thresholds Models: A General Class of Models for Varying Types of Items

Author

Listed:
  • Gerhard Tutz

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)

Abstract

A comprehensive class of models is proposed that can be used for continuous, binary, ordered categorical and count type responses. The difficulty of items is described by difficulty functions, which replace the item difficulty parameters that are typically used in item response models. They crucially determine the response distribution and make the models very flexible with regard to the range of distributions that are covered. The model class contains several widely used models as the binary Rasch model and the graded response model as special cases, allows for simplifications, and offers a distribution free alternative to count type items. A major strength of the models is that they can be used for mixed item formats, when different types of items are combined to measure abilities or attitudes. It is an immediate consequence of the comprehensive modeling approach that allows that difficulty functions automatically adapt to the response distribution. Basic properties of the model class are shown. Several real data sets are used to illustrate the flexibility of the models

Suggested Citation

  • Gerhard Tutz, 2022. "Item Response Thresholds Models: A General Class of Models for Varying Types of Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1238-1269, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:87:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11336-022-09865-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-022-09865-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-022-09865-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-022-09865-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shelby Haberman & Sandip Sinharay & Kyong Chon, 2013. "Assessing Item Fit for Unidimensional Item Response Theory Models Using Residuals from Estimated Item Response Functions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 417-440, July.
    2. Pascal Jordan & Martin Spiess, 2012. "Generalizations of Paradoxical Results in Multidimensional Item Response Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 127-152, January.
    3. David Thissen & Lynne Steinberg, 1986. "A taxonomy of item response models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(4), pages 567-577, December.
    4. Gerhard Tutz & Gunther Schauberger, 2015. "A Penalty Approach to Differential Item Functioning in Rasch Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 21-43, March.
    5. Fumiko Samejima, 1995. "Acceleration model in the heterogeneous case of the general graded response model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 549-572, December.
    6. Geoff Masters, 1982. "A rasch model for partial credit scoring," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 149-174, June.
    7. C. Glas & N. Verhelst, 1989. "Extensions of the partial credit model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(4), pages 635-659, September.
    8. Chalmers, R. Philip, 2012. "mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i06).
    9. Fumiko Samejima, 1973. "Homogeneous case of the continuous response model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(2), pages 203-219, June.
    10. David Andrich, 1978. "A rating formulation for ordered response categories," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 561-573, December.
    11. M. P. Wand, 2000. "A Comparison of Regression Spline Smoothing Procedures," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 443-462, December.
    12. Timothy R. Johnson & Daniel M. Bolt, 2010. "On the Use of Factor-Analytic Multinomial Logit Item Response Models to Account for Individual Differences in Response Style," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(1), pages 92-114, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bas Hemker & L. Andries van der Ark & Klaas Sijtsma, 2001. "On measurement properties of continuation ratio models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 487-506, December.
    2. van der Ark, L.A., 1999. "A reference card for the relationships between IRT models for ordered polytomous items and some relevant properties," WORC Paper 99.10.02, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    3. Hua-Hua Chang, 1996. "The asymptotic posterior normality of the latent trait for polytomous IRT models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 445-463, September.
    4. Albert Maydeu-Olivares & Harry Joe, 2006. "Limited Information Goodness-of-fit Testing in Multidimensional Contingency Tables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 713-732, December.
    5. Dylan Molenaar, 2015. "Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 625-644, September.
    6. Clemens Draxler, 2010. "Sample Size Determination for Rasch Model Tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 708-724, December.
    7. Singh, Jagdip, 2004. "Tackling measurement problems with Item Response Theory: Principles, characteristics, and assessment, with an illustrative example," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 184-208, February.
    8. David Magis, 2015. "A Note on the Equivalence Between Observed and Expected Information Functions With Polytomous IRT Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 40(1), pages 96-105, February.
    9. Clemens Draxler & Rainer Alexandrowicz, 2015. "Sample Size Determination Within the Scope of Conditional Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Special Focus on Testing the Rasch Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 897-919, December.
    10. Henk Kelderman & Carl Rijkes, 1994. "Loglinear multidimensional IRT models for polytomously scored items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 149-176, June.
    11. David Magis, 2015. "A Note on Weighted Likelihood and Jeffreys Modal Estimation of Proficiency Levels in Polytomous Item Response Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 200-204, March.
    12. Timothy R. Johnson & Daniel M. Bolt, 2010. "On the Use of Factor-Analytic Multinomial Logit Item Response Models to Account for Individual Differences in Response Style," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(1), pages 92-114, February.
    13. repec:jss:jstsof:20:i09 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. David Magis & Norman Verhelst, 2017. "On the Finiteness of the Weighted Likelihood Estimator of Ability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 637-647, September.
    15. Stefano Noventa & Andrea Spoto & Jürgen Heller & Augustin Kelava, 2019. "On a Generalization of Local Independence in Item Response Theory Based on Knowledge Space Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 395-421, June.
    16. P. A. Ferrari & S. Salini, 2008. "Measuring Service Quality: The Opinion of Europeans about Utilities," Working Papers 2008.36, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    17. Chang, Hsin-Li & Yang, Cheng-Hua, 2008. "Explore airlines’ brand niches through measuring passengers’ repurchase motivation—an application of Rasch measurement," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 105-112.
    18. Luo, Nanyu & Ji, Feng & Han, Yuting & He, Jinbo & Zhang, Xiaoya, 2024. "Fitting item response theory models using deep learning computational frameworks," OSF Preprints tjxab, Center for Open Science.
    19. Ivana Bassi & Matteo Carzedda & Enrico Gori & Luca Iseppi, 2022. "Rasch analysis of consumer attitudes towards the mountain product label," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Antonio Caronni & Marina Ramella & Pietro Arcuri & Claudia Salatino & Lucia Pigini & Maurizio Saruggia & Chiara Folini & Stefano Scarano & Rosa Maria Converti, 2023. "The Rasch Analysis Shows Poor Construct Validity and Low Reliability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0) Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    21. Curt Hagquist & Raili Välimaa & Nina Simonsen & Sakari Suominen, 2017. "Differential Item Functioning in Trend Analyses of Adolescent Mental Health – Illustrative Examples Using HBSC-Data from Finland," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 10(3), pages 673-691, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:87:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11336-022-09865-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.