IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v82y2017i2d10.1007_s11336-017-9566-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Penalized Likelihood Method for Structural Equation Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Po-Hsien Huang

    (National Taiwan University
    National Cheng Kung University)

  • Hung Chen

    (National Taiwan University)

  • Li-Jen Weng

    (National Taiwan University)

Abstract

A penalized likelihood (PL) method for structural equation modeling (SEM) was proposed as a methodology for exploring the underlying relations among both observed and latent variables. Compared to the usual likelihood method, PL includes a penalty term to control the complexity of the hypothesized model. When the penalty level is appropriately chosen, the PL can yield an SEM model that balances the model goodness-of-fit and model complexity. In addition, the PL results in a sparse estimate that enhances the interpretability of the final model. The proposed method is especially useful when limited substantive knowledge is available for model specifications. The PL method can be also understood as a methodology that links the traditional SEM to the exploratory SEM (Asparouhov & Muthén in Struct Equ Model Multidiscipl J 16:397–438, 2009). An expectation-conditional maximization algorithm was developed to maximize the PL criterion. The asymptotic properties of the proposed PL were also derived. The performance of PL was evaluated through a numerical experiment, and two real data illustrations were presented to demonstrate its utility in psychological research.

Suggested Citation

  • Po-Hsien Huang & Hung Chen & Li-Jen Weng, 2017. "A Penalized Likelihood Method for Structural Equation Modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(2), pages 329-354, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:82:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11336-017-9566-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-017-9566-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-017-9566-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-017-9566-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Yunxiao & Liu, Jingchen & Xu, Gongjun & Ying, Zhiliang, 2015. "Statistical analysis of Q-matrix based diagnostic classification models," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103183, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    3. Gerhard Tutz & Gunther Schauberger, 2015. "A Penalty Approach to Differential Item Functioning in Rasch Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 21-43, March.
    4. Nickolay Trendafilov & Kohei Adachi, 2015. "Sparse Versus Simple Structure Loadings," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 776-790, September.
    5. Gerhard Arminger & Ronald Schoenberg, 1989. "Pseudo maximum likelihood estimation and a test for misspecification in mean and covariance structure models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(3), pages 409-425, September.
    6. Sik-Yum Lee & Hong-Tu Zhu, 2002. "Maximum likelihood estimation of nonlinear structural equation models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 189-210, June.
    7. A. Shapiro & M. Browne, 1983. "On the investigation of local identifiability: A counterexample," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 48(2), pages 303-304, June.
    8. Yunxiao Chen & Jingchen Liu & Gongjun Xu & Zhiliang Ying, 2015. "Statistical Analysis of Q -Matrix Based Diagnostic Classification Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(510), pages 850-866, June.
    9. Roderick McDonald, 1982. "A note on the investigation of local and global identifiability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(1), pages 101-103, March.
    10. Joseph G. Ibrahim & Hongtu Zhu & Ramon I. Garcia & Ruixin Guo, 2011. "Fixed and Random Effects Selection in Mixed Effects Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 495-503, June.
    11. Mazumder, Rahul & Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor, 2011. "SparseNet: Coordinate Descent With Nonconvex Penalties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(495), pages 1125-1138.
    12. Sanjay Chaudhuri & Mathias Drton & Thomas S. Richardson, 2007. "Estimation of a covariance matrix with zeros," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(1), pages 199-216.
    13. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    14. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ai Ye & Kathleen M. Gates & Teague Rhine Henry & Lan Luo, 2021. "Path and Directionality Discovery in Individual Dynamic Models: A Regularized Unified Structural Equation Modeling Approach for Hybrid Vector Autoregression," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 404-441, June.
    2. Elena Geminiani & Giampiero Marra & Irini Moustaki, 2021. "Single- and Multiple-Group Penalized Factor Analysis: A Trust-Region Algorithm Approach with Integrated Automatic Multiple Tuning Parameter Selection," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 65-95, March.
    3. Alexander Robitzsch, 2022. "Comparing the Robustness of the Structural after Measurement (SAM) Approach to Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) against Local Model Misspecifications with Alternative Estimation Approaches," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-42, July.
    4. Hayakawa, Kazuhiko, 2024. "Recent development of covariance structure analysis in economics," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 31-48.
    5. Loh, Wen Wei & Ren, Dongning, 2021. "Data-driven Covariate Selection for Confounding Adjustment by Focusing on the Stability of the Effect Estimator," OSF Preprints yve6u, Center for Open Science.
    6. Abebe Techan Tolossa & Manjit Singh & Raj Kumar Gautam, 2024. "Unveiling the Nexus: the crucial role of competitive advantage in bridging entrepreneurial marketing practices and sustainable firm performance in small and medium enterprises," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Geminiani, Elena & Marra, Giampiero & Moustaki, Irini, 2021. "Single and multiple-group penalized factor analysis: a trust-region algorithm approach with integrated automatic multiple tuning parameter selection," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108873, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin, Shaobo & Moustaki, Irini & Yang-Wallentin, Fan, 2018. "Approximated penalized maximum likelihood for exploratory factor analysis: an orthogonal case," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88118, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Shaobo Jin & Irini Moustaki & Fan Yang-Wallentin, 2018. "Approximated Penalized Maximum Likelihood for Exploratory Factor Analysis: An Orthogonal Case," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 628-649, September.
    3. Juntao Wang & Yuan Li, 2023. "DINA Model with Entropy Penalization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Ping Wu & Xinchao Luo & Peirong Xu & Lixing Zhu, 2017. "New variable selection for linear mixed-effects models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(3), pages 627-646, June.
    5. Bartosz Uniejewski, 2024. "Regularization for electricity price forecasting," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 34(3), pages 267-286.
    6. Simona Buscemi & Antonella Plaia, 2020. "Model selection in linear mixed-effect models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 104(4), pages 529-575, December.
    7. Chenchen Ma & Jing Ouyang & Gongjun Xu, 2023. "Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 175-207, March.
    8. Mojtaba Ganjali & Taban Baghfalaki, 2018. "Application of Penalized Mixed Model in Identification of Genes in Yeast Cell-Cycle Gene Expression Data," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 6(2), pages 38-41, April.
    9. Xiang Zhang & Yichao Wu & Lan Wang & Runze Li, 2016. "Variable selection for support vector machines in moderately high dimensions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(1), pages 53-76, January.
    10. Zhang, Yan-Qing & Tian, Guo-Liang & Tang, Nian-Sheng, 2016. "Latent variable selection in structural equation models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 190-205.
    11. Yingying Fan & Jinchi Lv, 2014. "Asymptotic properties for combined L1 and concave regularization," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(1), pages 57-70.
    12. Geminiani, Elena & Marra, Giampiero & Moustaki, Irini, 2021. "Single and multiple-group penalized factor analysis: a trust-region algorithm approach with integrated automatic multiple tuning parameter selection," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108873, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Gabriel E Hoffman & Benjamin A Logsdon & Jason G Mezey, 2013. "PUMA: A Unified Framework for Penalized Multiple Regression Analysis of GWAS Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Hirose, Kei & Tateishi, Shohei & Konishi, Sadanori, 2013. "Tuning parameter selection in sparse regression modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 28-40.
    15. Elena Geminiani & Giampiero Marra & Irini Moustaki, 2021. "Single- and Multiple-Group Penalized Factor Analysis: A Trust-Region Algorithm Approach with Integrated Automatic Multiple Tuning Parameter Selection," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 65-95, March.
    16. Kin Yau Wong & Yair Goldberg & Jason P. Fine, 2016. "Oracle estimation of parametric models under boundary constraints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1173-1183, December.
    17. Margherita Giuzio, 2017. "Genetic algorithm versus classical methods in sparse index tracking," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 243-256, November.
    18. Shakhawat Hossain & Trevor Thomson & Ejaz Ahmed, 2018. "Shrinkage estimation in linear mixed models for longitudinal data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(5), pages 569-586, July.
    19. Chun Wang & Jing Lu, 2021. "Learning Attribute Hierarchies From Data: Two Exploratory Approaches," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(1), pages 58-84, February.
    20. Alexander Robitzsch, 2022. "Comparing the Robustness of the Structural after Measurement (SAM) Approach to Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) against Local Model Misspecifications with Alternative Estimation Approaches," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-42, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:82:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11336-017-9566-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.