IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v70y2005i4p599-617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fitting Psychometric Models with Methods Based on Automatic Differentiation

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Cudeck

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Cudeck, 2005. "Fitting Psychometric Models with Methods Based on Automatic Differentiation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 599-617, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:70:y:2005:i:4:p:599-617
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-005-1404-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11336-005-1404-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-005-1404-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ernest Froemel, 1971. "A comparison of computer routines for the calculation of the tetrachoric correlation coefficient," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 36(2), pages 165-174, June.
    2. Kalaba, Robert & Tishler, Asher, 1984. "Automatic Derivative Evaluation in the Optimization of Nonlinear Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 66(4), pages 653-660, November.
    3. Jerrell, Max E, 1997. "Automatic Differentiation and Interval Arithmetic for Estimation of Disequilibrium Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 10(3), pages 295-316, August.
    4. Max E. Jerrell, "undated". "Automatic Differentiation and Interval Arithmetic for Estimation of Disequilibrium Models," Computing in Economics and Finance 1997 91, Society for Computational Economics.
    5. Paul S. Albert & Lori E. Dodd, 2004. "A Cautionary Note on the Robustness of Latent Class Models for Estimating Diagnostic Error without a Gold Standard," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 427-435, June.
    6. Max E. Jerrell, "undated". "Automatic Differentiation and Interval Arithmetic for Estimation of Disequilibrium Models," Computing in Economics and Finance 1996 _028, Society for Computational Economics.
    7. Huang W. & Zeger S. L. & Anthony J. C. & Garrett E., 2001. "Latent Variable Model for Joint Analysis of Multiple Repeated Measures and Bivariate Event Times," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 906-914, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicholas J. Rockwood, 2020. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Multilevel Structural Equation Models with Random Slopes for Latent Covariates," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(2), pages 275-300, June.
    2. Ruggero Bellio & Nicola Soriani, 2021. "Maximum likelihood estimation based on the Laplace approximation for p2 network regression models," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 75(1), pages 24-41, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zilinskas, Julius & Bogle, Ian David Lockhart, 2006. "Balanced random interval arithmetic in market model estimation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1367-1378, December.
    2. Donal O'Neill & Olive Sweetman, 2013. "Estimating Obesity Rates in Europe in the Presence of Self-Reporting Errors," Economics Department Working Paper Series n236-13.pdf, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    3. Ulf Olsson, 1979. "Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 44(4), pages 443-460, December.
    4. Sarah J. Ratcliffe & Wensheng Guo & Thomas R. Ten Have, 2004. "Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Survival Data via a Common Frailty," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 892-899, December.
    5. Clara Drew & Moses Badio & Dehkontee Dennis & Lisa Hensley & Elizabeth Higgs & Michael Sneller & Mosoka Fallah & Cavan Reilly, 2023. "Simplifying the estimation of diagnostic testing accuracy over time for high specificity tests in the absence of a gold standard," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1546-1558, June.
    6. Subtil, Ana & de Oliveira, M. Rosário & Gonçalves, Luzia, 2012. "Conditional dependence diagnostic in the latent class model: A simulation study," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(7), pages 1407-1412.
    7. Chinyereugo M Umemneku Chikere & Kevin Wilson & Sara Graziadio & Luke Vale & A Joy Allen, 2019. "Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Robert Cudeck & Kelli Klebe & Susan Henly, 1993. "A simple Gauss-Newton procedure for covariance structure analysis with high-level computer languages," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 211-232, June.
    9. Max E. Jerrell, 1999. "Environments for Global Optimization Using Interval Arithmetic and Computational (Automatic) Differentiation," Computing in Economics and Finance 1999 1321, Society for Computational Economics.
    10. Bruce D. Spencer, 2012. "When Do Latent Class Models Overstate Accuracy for Diagnostic and Other Classifiers in the Absence of a Gold Standard?," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 559-566, June.
    11. O’Neill, Donal, 2015. "Measuring obesity in the absence of a gold standard," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 116-128.
    12. Galina Williams, 2015. "Households Willingness to Pay for the Emissions Reduction Policy, Queensland, Australia," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(3), pages 21582440156, September.
    13. Bo Zhang & Zhen Chen & Paul S. Albert, 2012. "Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy of Raters Without a Gold Standard by Exploiting a Group of Experts," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1294-1302, December.
    14. Peijie Hou & Joshua M. Tebbs & Christopher R. Bilder & Christopher S. McMahan, 2017. "Hierarchical group testing for multiple infections," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 656-665, June.
    15. Mengbing Li & Daniel E. Park & Maliha Aziz & Cindy M. Liu & Lance B. Price & Zhenke Wu, 2023. "Integrating sample similarities into latent class analysis: a tree‐structured shrinkage approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 264-279, March.
    16. Elizabeth R. Brown, 2010. "Bayesian Estimation of the Time-Varying Sensitivity of a Diagnostic Test with Application to Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 1266-1274, December.
    17. Paul S. Albert, 2007. "Random Effects Modeling Approaches for Estimating ROC Curves from Repeated Ordinal Tests without a Gold Standard," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 593-602, June.
    18. Leandro García Barrado & Els Coart & Tomasz Burzykowski, 2017. "Estimation of diagnostic accuracy of a combination of continuous biomarkers allowing for conditional dependence between the biomarkers and the imperfect reference-test," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 646-655, June.
    19. Geoffrey Jones & Wesley O. Johnson & Timothy E. Hanson & Ronald Christensen, 2010. "Identifiability of Models for Multiple Diagnostic Testing in the Absence of a Gold Standard," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 855-863, September.
    20. Daniel Oberski & Geert Kollenburg & Jeroen Vermunt, 2013. "A Monte Carlo evaluation of three methods to detect local dependence in binary data latent class models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 7(3), pages 267-279, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:70:y:2005:i:4:p:599-617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.