IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v53y1988i1p93-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aggregate item response analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon Bechtel
  • Chezy Ofir

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon Bechtel & Chezy Ofir, 1988. "Aggregate item response analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(1), pages 93-107, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:53:y:1988:i:1:p:93-107
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02294196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02294196
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02294196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Ramsay, 1973. "The effect of number of categories in rating scales on precision of estimation of scale values," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(4), pages 513-532, December.
    2. Gordon G. Bechtel, 1985. "Generalizing the Rasch Model for Consumer Rating Scales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 62-73.
    3. Ernest Adams & Samuel Messick, 1958. "An axiomatic formulation and generalization of successive intervals scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 23(4), pages 355-368, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salzberger, Thomas & Koller, Monika, 2013. "Towards a new paradigm of measurement in marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1307-1317.
    2. Duane F. Alwin, 1997. "Feeling Thermometers Versus 7-Point Scales," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 25(3), pages 318-340, February.
    3. Wayne DeSarbo & Joonwook Park & Vithala Rao, 2011. "Deriving joint space positioning maps from consumer preference ratings," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-14, March.
    4. J. Vera & Rodrigo Macías & Willem Heiser, 2009. "A Latent Class Multidimensional Scaling Model for Two-Way One-Mode Continuous Rating Dissimilarity Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 297-315, June.
    5. Robert O'Brien & Pamela Homer, 1987. "Corrections for coarsely categorized measures: LISREL's polyserial and polychoric correlations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 349-360, December.
    6. Maud Dampérat & Ping Lei & Florence Jeannot, 2019. "IRT Approach for rating scales: applications for normal and non-normal distributions," Post-Print hal-04325043, HAL.
    7. Robert Cummins, 1995. "On the trail of the gold standard for subjective well-being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 179-200, June.
    8. Ledyard Tucker & Samuel Messick, 1963. "An individual differences model for multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 28(4), pages 333-367, December.
    9. Wayne DeSarbo & Joonwook Park & Crystal Scott, 2008. "A Model-Based Approach for Visualizing the Dimensional Structure of Ordered Successive Categories Preference Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Laura Wagner & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2020. "Pricing and Assortment Strategies with Product Exchanges," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 453-466, March.
    11. Dolnicar, Sara & Grün, Bettina, 2009. "Does one size fit all? The suitability of answer formats for different constructs measured," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 58-64.
    12. Joan Batista-Foguet & Willem Saris, 1992. "A new measurement procedure for attitudinal research. Analysis of its psychometric and informational properties," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 127-146, May.
    13. Hannes Eisler, 1965. "The connection between magnitude and discrimination scales and direct and indirect scaling methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 30(3), pages 271-289, September.
    14. Lily Neumann, 1983. "Effects of scale length on means and correlation coefficients," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 405-408, September.
    15. Christian Genest & Johanna G. Nešlehová, 2014. "A Conversation with James O. Ramsay," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 161-183, August.
    16. de Jong, M.G., 2006. "Response bias in international marketing research," Other publications TiSEM 5d4031be-97b5-4db3-962b-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Ling Peng & Geng Cui & Yuho Chung & Chunyu Li, 2019. "A multi-facet item response theory approach to improve customer satisfaction using online product ratings," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 960-976, September.
    18. Graham K. Kenny, 1986. "The Metric Properties of Rating Scales Employed in Evaluation Research," Evaluation Review, , vol. 10(3), pages 397-408, June.
    19. Breitmoser, Yves, 2018. "The Axiomatic Foundation of Logit," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 78, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    20. Viswanathan, Madhubalan & Sudman, Seymour & Johnson, Michael, 2004. "Maximum versus meaningful discrimination in scale response:: Implications for validity of measurement of consumer perceptions about products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 108-124, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:53:y:1988:i:1:p:93-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.