IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v51y1986i2p241-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An efficient alternating least-squares algorithm to perform multidimensional unfolding

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Greenacre
  • Michael Browne

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Greenacre & Michael Browne, 1986. "An efficient alternating least-squares algorithm to perform multidimensional unfolding," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(2), pages 241-250, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:51:y:1986:i:2:p:241-250
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02293982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02293982
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02293982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Schönemann & Ming Wang, 1972. "An individual difference model for the multidimensional analysis of preference data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(3), pages 275-309, September.
    2. John Ross & Norman Cliff, 1964. "A generalization of the interpoint distance model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 29(2), pages 167-176, June.
    3. J. Ramsay, 1975. "Solving implicit equations in psychometric data analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 40(3), pages 337-360, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wayne DeSarbo & Vithala Rao, 1984. "GENFOLD2: A set of models and algorithms for the general UnFOLDing analysis of preference/dominance data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 1(1), pages 147-186, December.
    2. Jos Berge, 1991. "A general solution for a class of weakly constrained linear regression problems," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 601-609, December.
    3. Shizuhiko Nishisato, 1996. "Gleaning in the field of dual scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 559-599, December.
    4. Joonwook Park & Priyali Rajagopal & Wayne DeSarbo, 2012. "A New Heterogeneous Multidimensional Unfolding Procedure," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 263-287, April.
    5. John Gower & Michael Greenacre, 1996. "Unfolding a symmetric matrix," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 13(1), pages 81-105, March.
    6. Yvonnick Noel, 2014. "A Beta Unfolding Model for Continuous Bounded Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 647-674, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wayne DeSarbo & Vithala Rao, 1984. "GENFOLD2: A set of models and algorithms for the general UnFOLDing analysis of preference/dominance data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 1(1), pages 147-186, December.
    2. Peter Schönemann, 1970. "On metric multidimensional unfolding," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(3), pages 349-366, September.
    3. Wayne DeSarbo & Kamel Jedidi & Joel Steckel, 1991. "A stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the empirical determination of convex indifference curves for preference/choice analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 279-307, June.
    4. Christian Genest & Johanna G. Nešlehová, 2014. "A Conversation with James O. Ramsay," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 161-183, August.
    5. Gordon Bechtel & Ledyard Tucker & Wei-Ching Chang, 1971. "A scalar product model for the multidimensional scaling of choice," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 36(4), pages 369-388, December.
    6. P. Bentler, 1986. "Structural modeling and psychometrika: An historical perspective on growth and achievements," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 35-51, March.
    7. Herbert Hoijtink & Ivo Molenaar, 1992. "Testing for DIF in a model with single peaked item characteristic curves: The parella model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 383-397, September.
    8. Yoshio Takane & Jan Leeuw, 1987. "On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 393-408, September.
    9. Herbert Hoijtink, 1990. "A latent trait model for dichotomous choice data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 641-656, December.
    10. Henk Kiers & Jos Berge & Yoshio Takane & Jan Leeuw, 1990. "A generalization of Takane's algorithm for dedicom," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 151-158, March.
    11. Polak, Marike & Heiser, Willem J. & de Rooij, Mark, 2009. "Two types of single-peaked data: Correspondence analysis as an alternative to principal component analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3117-3128, June.
    12. Forrest Young & Norman Cliff, 1972. "Interactive scaling with individual subjects," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(4), pages 385-415, December.
    13. Shizuhiko Nishisato, 1996. "Gleaning in the field of dual scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 559-599, December.
    14. Robert Mislevy & Mark Wilson, 1996. "Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for a psychometric model of discontinuous development," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 41-71, March.
    15. Henk Kiers, 1990. "Majorization as a tool for optimizing a class of matrix functions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 417-428, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:51:y:1986:i:2:p:241-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.