IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v36y1971i4p369-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A scalar product model for the multidimensional scaling of choice

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon Bechtel
  • Ledyard Tucker
  • Wei-Ching Chang

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon Bechtel & Ledyard Tucker & Wei-Ching Chang, 1971. "A scalar product model for the multidimensional scaling of choice," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 36(4), pages 369-388, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:36:y:1971:i:4:p:369-388
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02291364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02291364
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02291364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Ross & Norman Cliff, 1964. "A generalization of the interpoint distance model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 29(2), pages 167-176, June.
    2. Clyde Coombs & Richard Kao, 1960. "On a connection between factor analysis and multidimensional unfolding," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 25(3), pages 219-231, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kohei Adachi, 2011. "Constrained principal component analysis of standardized data for biplots with unit-length variable vectors," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 5(1), pages 23-36, April.
    2. Shizuhiko Nishisato & Wen-Jenn Sheu, 1984. "A note on dual scaling of successive categories data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(4), pages 493-500, December.
    3. Yoshio Takane & Tadashi Shibayama, 1991. "Principal component analysis with external information on both subjects and variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 97-120, March.
    4. Shizuhiko Nishisato, 1984. "Forced classification: A simple application of a quantification method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(1), pages 25-36, March.
    5. Wayne DeSarbo & Kamel Jedidi & Joel Steckel, 1991. "A stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the empirical determination of convex indifference curves for preference/choice analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 279-307, June.
    6. Wayne DeSarbo & Jaewun Cho, 1989. "A stochastic multidimensional scaling vector threshold model for the spatial representation of “pick any/n” data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(1), pages 105-129, March.
    7. Shizuhiko Nishisato, 1978. "Optimal scaling of paired comparison and rank order data: An alternative to guttman's formulation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(2), pages 263-271, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Polak, Marike & Heiser, Willem J. & de Rooij, Mark, 2009. "Two types of single-peaked data: Correspondence analysis as an alternative to principal component analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3117-3128, June.
    2. Yoshio Takane & J. Carroll, 1981. "Nonmetric maximum likelihood multidimensional scaling from directional rankings of similarities," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(4), pages 389-405, December.
    3. Wayne DeSarbo & Vithala Rao, 1984. "GENFOLD2: A set of models and algorithms for the general UnFOLDing analysis of preference/dominance data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 1(1), pages 147-186, December.
    4. John Horn & Bert Green & J. Carroll & Kenneth Hopkins & James Collins, 1970. "Reviews," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(2), pages 273-282, June.
    5. Harry Harman, 1969. "Retrospective anticipation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(4), pages 407-420, December.
    6. Forrest Young & Norman Cliff, 1972. "Interactive scaling with individual subjects," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(4), pages 385-415, December.
    7. Mark Davison, 1977. "On a metric, unidimensional unfolding model for attitudinal and developmental data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(4), pages 523-548, December.
    8. Peter Schönemann, 1970. "On metric multidimensional unfolding," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(3), pages 349-366, September.
    9. Aquino Llinares, Nieves, 2015. "Unfolding Analysis of Work Conditions Affecting Employees’ Health According to their Positions in the Area of Solid Waste || Análisis unfolding de las condiciones de trabajo que afectan la salud de lo," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 20(1), pages 53-63, December.
    10. Michael Greenacre & Michael Browne, 1986. "An efficient alternating least-squares algorithm to perform multidimensional unfolding," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(2), pages 241-250, June.
    11. Shizuhiko Nishisato, 1996. "Gleaning in the field of dual scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 559-599, December.
    12. Frank Busing & Patrick Groenen & Willem Heiser, 2005. "Avoiding degeneracy in multidimensional unfolding by penalizing on the coefficient of variation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 71-98, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:36:y:1971:i:4:p:369-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.