IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v37y1972i3p275-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An individual difference model for the multidimensional analysis of preference data

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Schönemann
  • Ming Wang

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Schönemann & Ming Wang, 1972. "An individual difference model for the multidimensional analysis of preference data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(3), pages 275-309, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:37:y:1972:i:3:p:275-309
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02306784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02306784
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02306784?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Luce, 1961. "A choice theory analysis of similarity judgments," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 26(2), pages 151-163, June.
    2. Gottfried Noether, 1960. "Remarks about a paired comparison model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 25(4), pages 357-367, December.
    3. Frederick Mosteller, 1951. "Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: III. A test of significance for paired comparisons when equal standard deviations and equal correlations are assumed," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(2), pages 207-218, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wayne DeSarbo & Vithala Rao, 1984. "GENFOLD2: A set of models and algorithms for the general UnFOLDing analysis of preference/dominance data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 1(1), pages 147-186, December.
    2. Wayne DeSarbo & Kamel Jedidi & Joel Steckel, 1991. "A stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the empirical determination of convex indifference curves for preference/choice analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 279-307, June.
    3. Michael Greenacre & Michael Browne, 1986. "An efficient alternating least-squares algorithm to perform multidimensional unfolding," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(2), pages 241-250, June.
    4. Yoshio Takane & Jan Leeuw, 1987. "On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 393-408, September.
    5. Shizuhiko Nishisato, 1996. "Gleaning in the field of dual scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 559-599, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonika Thakur & Shashi Kanta Varma & Patricia A. Goldey, 2001. "Perceptions of drudgery in agricultural and animal husbandry operations: a gender analysis from Haryana State, India," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(8), pages 1165-1178.
    2. Dennie van Dolder & Vincent Buskens, 2014. "Individual Choices in Dynamic Networks: An Experiment on Social Preferences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Costa, F. P. & Rehman, T., 1999. "Exploring the link between farmers' objectives and the phenomenon of pasture degradation in the beef production systems of Central Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 135-146, August.
    4. Wai Chan & Peter Bentler, 1998. "Covariance structure analysis of ordinal ipsative data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 369-399, December.
    5. H. Morrison, 1963. "Testable conditions for triads of paired comparison choices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 28(4), pages 369-390, December.
    6. Vincent Buskens & Jeroen Weesie, 2000. "An Experiment On The Effects Of Embeddedness In Trust Situations," Rationality and Society, , vol. 12(2), pages 227-253, May.
    7. Smith, Donnie & Capstick, Daniel F., 1976. "Establishing Priorities Among Multiple Management Goals," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-7, December.
    8. James Lattin, 1990. "A minimum-cost network-flow solution to the case V thurstone scaling problem," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 353-370, June.
    9. Gensch, Dennis H. & Ghose, Sanjoy, 1997. "Improving PRETREE's predictive capabilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 465-479, March.
    10. R. Darrell Bock, 1958. "Remarks on the test of significance for the method of paired comparisons," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 23(4), pages 323-334, December.
    11. Harold Gulliksen, 1961. "Linear and multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 26(1), pages 9-25, March.
    12. Graham K. Kenny, 1986. "The Metric Properties of Rating Scales Employed in Evaluation Research," Evaluation Review, , vol. 10(3), pages 397-408, June.
    13. Donald Martin, 1999. "Paired comparison models applied to the design of the Major League baseball play-offs," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 69-80.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:37:y:1972:i:3:p:275-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.