IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v43y1978i4p491-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A direct approach to individual differences scaling using increasingly complex transformations

Author

Listed:
  • James Lingoes
  • Ingwer Borg

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • James Lingoes & Ingwer Borg, 1978. "A direct approach to individual differences scaling using increasingly complex transformations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 491-519, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:43:y:1978:i:4:p:491-519
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02293810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02293810
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02293810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shlomit Levy, 1976. "Use of the mapping sentence for coordinating theory and research: A cross-cultural example," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 117-125, June.
    2. J. Carroll & Jih-Jie Chang, 1970. "Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(3), pages 283-319, September.
    3. Peter Schönemann, 1966. "A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 31(1), pages 1-10, March.
    4. Peter Schönemann, 1972. "An algebraic solution for a class of subjective metrics models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(4), pages 441-451, December.
    5. James Lingoes & Peter Schönemann, 1974. "Alternative measures of fit for the Schönemann-carroll matrix fitting algorithm," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(4), pages 423-427, December.
    6. Jos Berge, 1977. "Orthogonal procrustes rotation for two or more matrices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(2), pages 267-276, June.
    7. C. Horan, 1969. "Multidimensional scaling: Combining observations when individuals have different perceptual structures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(2), pages 139-165, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bennani Dosse, Mohammed & Kiers, Henk A.L. & Ten Berge, Jos M.F., 2011. "Anisotropic generalized Procrustes analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 1961-1968, May.
    2. Joost Ginkel & Pieter Kroonenberg, 2014. "Using Generalized Procrustes Analysis for Multiple Imputation in Principal Component Analysis," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 31(2), pages 242-269, July.
    3. Ab Mooijaart & Jacques Commandeur, 1990. "A general solution of the weighted orthonormal procrustes problem," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 657-663, December.
    4. Jos Berge, 1988. "Generalized approaches to the maxbet problem and the maxdiff problem, with applications to canonical correlations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(4), pages 487-494, December.
    5. Ingwer Borg & Rene Bergermaier, 1981. "Some comments on ‘the structure of subjective well-being in nine western societies’ by andrews and inglehart," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 265-278, September.
    6. Alan Brier & Bruno Hopp, 2011. "Computer assisted text analysis in the social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 103-128, January.
    7. Husson, F. & Pages, J., 2006. "INDSCAL model: geometrical interpretation and methodology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 358-378, January.
    8. Henk Kiers, 1990. "Majorization as a tool for optimizing a class of matrix functions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 417-428, September.
    9. Edmund Peay, 1988. "Multidimensional rotation and scaling of configurations to optimal agreement," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(2), pages 199-208, June.
    10. A. Coxon & Charles Jones, 1980. "Multidimensional scaling: exploration to confirmation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 31-73, January.
    11. Rian Blokland-Vogelesang & Henk Kiers, 1992. "Reviews," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 319-326, June.
    12. Groenen, P.J.F. & Borg, I., 2013. "The Past, Present, and Future of Multidimensional Scaling," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2013-07, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoshio Takane & Forrest Young & Jan Leeuw, 1977. "Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(1), pages 7-67, March.
    2. Jan Leeuw & Sandra Pruzansky, 1978. "A new computational method to fit the weighted euclidean distance model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 479-490, December.
    3. Akinori Okada & Tadashi Imaizumi, 1997. "Asymmetric multidimensional scaling of two-mode three-way proximities," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 14(2), pages 195-224, September.
    4. Bruce Bloxom, 1978. "Constrained multidimensional scaling inN spaces," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 397-408, September.
    5. Forrest Young & Yoshio Takane & Rostyslaw Lewyckyj, 1978. "Three notes on ALSCAL," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 433-435, September.
    6. de Leeuw, Jan & Mair, Patrick, 2009. "Multidimensional Scaling Using Majorization: SMACOF in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 31(i03).
    7. Giuseppe Bove & Akinori Okada, 2018. "Methods for the analysis of asymmetric pairwise relationships," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(1), pages 5-31, March.
    8. Vina Vani & M. Raghavachari, 1985. "A note on the determination of configuration and weights for a class of individual scaling models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 539-542, December.
    9. Harvey Cohen & Lawrence Jones, 1974. "The effects of random error and subsampling of dimensions on recovery of configurations by non-metric multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(1), pages 69-90, March.
    10. J. Ramsay & Jos Berge & G. Styan, 1984. "Matrix correlation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(3), pages 403-423, September.
    11. Jacqueline Meulman & Peter Verboon, 1993. "Points of view analysis revisited: Fitting multidimensional structures to optimal distance components with cluster restrictions on the variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 7-35, March.
    12. Pacifico, Antonio, 2020. "Bayesian Fuzzy Clustering with Robust Weighted Distance for Multiple ARIMA and Multivariate Time-Series," MPRA Paper 104379, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. W. Alan Nicewander & Joseph Lee Rodgers, 2022. "Obituary: Bruce McArthur Bloxom 1938–2020," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 1042-1044, September.
    14. Richard Sands & Forrest Young, 1980. "Component models for three-way data: An alternating least squares algorithm with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 39-67, March.
    15. Jámbor, Attila & Kovács, Sándor & Somai, Miklós, 2016. "Tíz év az Európai Unióban - az új tagországok agrárteljesítményei [A decade in the EU: the agricultural performances of the new member-states]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 260-284.
    16. Robert Lissitz & Peter Schönemann & James Lingoes, 1976. "A solution to the weighted procrustes problem in which the transformation is in agreement with the loss function," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(4), pages 547-550, December.
    17. Mariela González-Narváez & María José Fernández-Gómez & Susana Mendes & José-Luis Molina & Omar Ruiz-Barzola & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2021. "Study of Temporal Variations in Species–Environment Association through an Innovative Multivariate Method: MixSTATICO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    18. Joost Ginkel & Pieter Kroonenberg, 2014. "Using Generalized Procrustes Analysis for Multiple Imputation in Principal Component Analysis," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 31(2), pages 242-269, July.
    19. Wedel, M. & Bijmolt, T.H.A., 1998. "Mixed Tree and Spatial Representation of Dissimilarity Judgments," Discussion Paper 1998-109, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    20. James Alt & Bo Särlvik & Ivor Crewe, 1976. "Individual differences scaling and group attitude structures: British party imagery in 1974," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 297-320, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:43:y:1978:i:4:p:491-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.