IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p5924-d561351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of Temporal Variations in Species–Environment Association through an Innovative Multivariate Method: MixSTATICO

Author

Listed:
  • Mariela González-Narváez

    (Statistics Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca (USAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
    Faculty of Life Sciences, Campus Gustavo Galindo, ESPOL Polytechnic University, Km 30.5 Vía Perimetral, Guayaquil 090902, Ecuador)

  • María José Fernández-Gómez

    (Statistics Department, Faculty of Biology, University of Salamanca (USAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
    Statistics Department, Institute for Biomedical Research (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain)

  • Susana Mendes

    (MARE—Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ESTM, Polytechnic of Leiria, School of Tourism and Maritime Technology, 2520-641 Peniche, Portugal)

  • José-Luis Molina

    (IGA Research Group, Higher Polytechnic School of Ávila, University of Salamanca (USAL), 50 Avenue Hornos Caleros, 05003 Ávila, Spain)

  • Omar Ruiz-Barzola

    (Faculty of Life Sciences, Campus Gustavo Galindo, ESPOL Polytechnic University, Km 30.5 Vía Perimetral, Guayaquil 090902, Ecuador)

  • Purificación Galindo-Villardón

    (Statistics Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca (USAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
    Statistics Department, Institute for Biomedical Research (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain)

Abstract

The study of biotic and abiotic factors and their interrelationships is essential in the preservation of sustainable marine ecosystems and for understanding the impact that climate change can have on different species. For instance, phytoplankton are extremely vulnerable to environmental changes and thus studying the factors involved is important for the species’ conservation. This work examines the relationship between phytoplankton and environmental parameters of the eastern equatorial Pacific, known as one of the most biologically rich regions in the world. For this purpose, a new multivariate method called MixSTATICO has been developed, allowing mixed-type data structured in two different groups (environment and species) to be related and measured on a space–time scale. The results obtained show how seasons have an impact on species–environment relations, with the most significant association occurring in November and the weakest during the month of May (change of season). The species Lauderia borealis , Chaetoceros didymus and Gyrodinium sp. were not observed in the coastal profiles during the dry season at most stations, while during the rainy season, the species Dactyliosolen antarcticus , Proboscia alata and Skeletonema costatum were not detected. Using MixSTATICO, species vulnerable to specific geographical locations and environmental variations were identified, making it possible to establish biological indicators for this region.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariela González-Narváez & María José Fernández-Gómez & Susana Mendes & José-Luis Molina & Omar Ruiz-Barzola & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2021. "Study of Temporal Variations in Species–Environment Association through an Innovative Multivariate Method: MixSTATICO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5924-:d:561351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5924/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5924/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qian Ding & Xun Shi & Dafang Zhuang & Yong Wang, 2018. "Temporal and Spatial Distributions of Ecological Vulnerability under the Influence of Natural and Anthropogenic Factors in an Eco-Province under Construction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Carmen C. Rodríguez-Martínez & Isabel María García-Sánchez & Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2019. "Exploring Relationships between Environmental Performance, E-Government and Corruption: A Multivariate Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Samarpita Basu & Katherine R. M. Mackey, 2018. "Phytoplankton as Key Mediators of the Biological Carbon Pump: Their Responses to a Changing Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Anna Sperotto & Josè Luis Molina & Silvia Torresan & Andrea Critto & Manuel Pulido-Velazquez & Antonio Marcomini, 2019. "Water Quality Sustainability Evaluation under Uncertainty: A Multi-Scenario Analysis Based on Bayesian Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-34, August.
    5. Vivien, Myrtille & Sabatier, Robert, 2004. "A generalization of STATIS-ACT strategy: DO-ACT for two multiblocks tables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 155-171, May.
    6. Vallejo-Arboleda, Amparo & Vicente-Villardon, Jose L. & Galindo-Villardon, M.P., 2007. "Canonical STATIS: Biplot analysis of multi-table group structured data based on STATIS-ACT methodology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4193-4205, May.
    7. Pieter Kroonenberg & Jan Leeuw, 1980. "Principal component analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 69-97, March.
    8. Susana Mendes & M. Jos� Fernández-Gómez & Mário Jorge Pereira & Ulisses Miranda Azeiteiro & M. Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2012. "An empirical comparison of Canonical Correspondence Analysis and STATICO in the identification of spatio-temporal ecological relationships," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 979-994, October.
    9. Jacques Bénasséni & Mohammed Bennani Dosse, 2012. "Analyzing multiset data by the Power STATIS-ACT method," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 6(1), pages 49-65, April.
    10. Harold Hotelling, 1936. "Simplified calculation of principal components," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 1(1), pages 27-35, March.
    11. Susana Mendes & M. José Fernández-Gómez & Sónia Cotrim Marques & Miguel Ângelo Pardal & Ulisses Miranda Azeiteiro & M. Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2017. "CO-tucker: a new method for the simultaneous analysis of a sequence of paired tables," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(15), pages 2729-2755, November.
    12. J. Douglas Carroll & Sandra Pruzansky & Joseph Kruskal, 1980. "Candelinc: A general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parameters," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 3-24, March.
    13. Qing Gu & Yao Zhang & Ligang Ma & Jiadan Li & Ke Wang & Kefeng Zheng & Xiaobin Zhang & Li Sheng, 2016. "Assessment of Reservoir Water Quality Using Multivariate Statistical Techniques: A Case Study of Qiandao Lake, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, March.
    14. J. Carroll & Jih-Jie Chang, 1970. "Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(3), pages 283-319, September.
    15. Ledyard Tucker, 1972. "Relations between multidimensional scaling and three-mode factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 3-27, March.
    16. Ledyard Tucker, 1966. "Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 31(3), pages 279-311, September.
    17. Escofier, B. & Pages, J., 1994. "Multiple factor analysis (AFMULT package)," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 121-140, August.
    18. Pedro-José Martínez-Córdoba & Víctor Amor-Esteban & Bernardino Benito & Isabel-María García-Sánchez, 2021. "The Commitment of Spanish Local Governments to Sustainable Development Goal 11 from a Multivariate Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Michel Tenenhaus & Forrest Young, 1985. "An analysis and synthesis of multiple correspondence analysis, optimal scaling, dual scaling, homogeneity analysis and other methods for quantifying categorical multivariate data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 91-119, March.
    20. Charles Gyamfi & Julius M. Ndambuki & Ramadhan W. Salim, 2016. "Simulation of Sediment Yield in a Semi-Arid River Basin under Changing Land Use: An Integrated Approach of Hydrologic Modelling and Principal Component Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, November.
    21. José-Luis Molina & Santiago Zazo & Ana-María Martín-Casado & María-Carmen Patino-Alonso, 2020. "Rivers’ Temporal Sustainability through the Evaluation of Predictive Runoff Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, February.
    22. Bono, Filippa & Giacomarra, Marcella, 2016. "The photovoltaic growth in the European Union requires stronger RES support," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 324-339.
    23. Lavit, Christine & Escoufier, Yves & Sabatier, Robert & Traissac, Pierre, 1994. "The ACT (STATIS method)," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 97-119, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henk Kiers, 1991. "Hierarchical relations among three-way methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 449-470, September.
    2. Willem Kloot & Pieter Kroonenberg, 1985. "External analysis with three-mode principal component models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 479-494, December.
    3. Timmerman, Marieke E. & Kiers, Henk A. L., 2002. "Three-way component analysis with smoothness constraints," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 447-470, September.
    4. Richard Harshman & Margaret Lundy, 1996. "Uniqueness proof for a family of models sharing features of Tucker's three-mode factor analysis and PARAFAC/candecomp," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 133-154, March.
    5. Jacques Bénasséni & Mohammed Bennani Dosse, 2012. "Analyzing multiset data by the Power STATIS-ACT method," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 6(1), pages 49-65, April.
    6. Dawn Iacobucci & Doug Grisaffe & Wayne DeSarbo, 2017. "Statistical perceptual maps: using confidence region ellipses to enhance the interpretations of brand positions in multidimensional scaling," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(3), pages 81-98, December.
    7. Elisa Frutos-Bernal & Ángel Martín del Rey & Irene Mariñas-Collado & María Teresa Santos-Martín, 2022. "An Analysis of Travel Patterns in Barcelona Metro Using Tucker3 Decomposition," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Yoshio Takane & Forrest Young & Jan Leeuw, 1977. "Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(1), pages 7-67, March.
    9. Giuseppe Brandi & Ruggero Gramatica & Tiziana Di Matteo, 2019. "Unveil stock correlation via a new tensor-based decomposition method," Papers 1911.06126, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    10. Isabel Gallego-Álvarez & Miguel Rodríguez-Rosa & Purificación Vicente-Galindo, 2021. "Are Worldwide Governance Indicators Stable or Do They Change over Time? A Comparative Study Using Multivariate Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Wilderjans, Tom & Ceulemans, Eva & Van Mechelen, Iven, 2009. "Simultaneous analysis of coupled data blocks differing in size: A comparison of two weighting schemes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1086-1098, February.
    12. Carmen C. Rodríguez-Martínez & Isabel María García-Sánchez & Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2019. "Exploring Relationships between Environmental Performance, E-Government and Corruption: A Multivariate Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Michel Velden & Tammo Bijmolt, 2006. "Generalized canonical correlation analysis of matrices with missing rows: a simulation study," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 323-331, June.
    14. Paolo Giordani & Roberto Rocci & Giuseppe Bove, 2020. "Factor Uniqueness of the Structural Parafac Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 555-574, September.
    15. Alwin Stegeman & Tam Lam, 2014. "Three-Mode Factor Analysis by Means of Candecomp/Parafac," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 426-443, July.
    16. Caterina Liberati & Paolo Mariani, 2012. "Banking customer satisfaction evaluation: a three-way factor perspective," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 6(4), pages 323-336, December.
    17. Roberto Rocci & Jos Berge, 2002. "Transforming three-way arrays to maximal simplicity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 351-365, September.
    18. Bilian Chen & Zhening Li & Shuzhong Zhang, 2015. "On optimal low rank Tucker approximation for tensors: the case for an adjustable core size," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 811-832, August.
    19. Veldscholte, Carla M. & Kroonenberg, Pieter M. & Antonides, Gerrit, 1998. "Three-mode analysis of perceptions of economic activities in Eastern and Western Europe1," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 321-351, June.
    20. Rubinstein, Alexander & Slutskin, Lev, 2018. "«Multiway data analysis» and the general problem of journals’ ranking," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 50, pages 90-113.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5924-:d:561351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.