IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v55y2011i5p1961-1968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anisotropic generalized Procrustes analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Bennani Dosse, Mohammed
  • Kiers, Henk A.L.
  • Ten Berge, Jos M.F.

Abstract

Generalized Procrustes analysis is a popular method for matching several configurations by translations, rotations/reflections and scaling constants. It aims at producing a group average from these Euclidean similarity transformations followed by bi-linear approximation of this group average for graphical inspection. An extension that allows for anisotropic scaling (i.e. different scaling of different dimensions) is proposed. This method is illustrated using two real data sets from sensory analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Bennani Dosse, Mohammed & Kiers, Henk A.L. & Ten Berge, Jos M.F., 2011. "Anisotropic generalized Procrustes analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 1961-1968, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:5:p:1961-1968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(10)00455-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edmund Peay, 1988. "Multidimensional rotation and scaling of configurations to optimal agreement," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(2), pages 199-208, June.
    2. Bert Green, 1952. "The orthogonal approximation of an oblique structure in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 17(4), pages 429-440, December.
    3. Jos Berge & Dirk Knol, 1984. "Orthogonal rotations to maximal agreement for two or more matrices of different column orders," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(1), pages 49-55, March.
    4. Oberhofer, W & Kmenta, J, 1974. "A General Procedure for Obtaining Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Generalized Regression Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 42(3), pages 579-590, May.
    5. Byron J. T. Morgan, 1989. "Introduction to Optimization," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 152(2), pages 254-255, March.
    6. J. Gower, 1975. "Generalized procrustes analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 40(1), pages 33-51, March.
    7. Mohammed Bennani Dosse & Jos Berge, 2010. "Anisotropic Orthogonal Procrustes Analysis," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 27(1), pages 111-128, March.
    8. Jos Berge, 1977. "Orthogonal procrustes rotation for two or more matrices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(2), pages 267-276, June.
    9. James Lingoes & Ingwer Borg, 1978. "A direct approach to individual differences scaling using increasingly complex transformations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 491-519, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed Bennani Dosse & Jos Berge, 2010. "Anisotropic Orthogonal Procrustes Analysis," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 27(1), pages 111-128, March.
    2. Joost Ginkel & Pieter Kroonenberg, 2014. "Using Generalized Procrustes Analysis for Multiple Imputation in Principal Component Analysis," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 31(2), pages 242-269, July.
    3. Dahl, Tobias & Naes, Tormod, 2006. "A bridge between Tucker-1 and Carroll's generalized canonical analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(11), pages 3086-3098, July.
    4. Angela Andreella & Riccardo Santis & Anna Vesely & Livio Finos, 2023. "Procrustes-based distances for exploring between-matrices similarity," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(3), pages 867-882, September.
    5. Edmund Peay, 1988. "Multidimensional rotation and scaling of configurations to optimal agreement," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(2), pages 199-208, June.
    6. Balbi, S & Esposito, V, 2000. "Rotated canonical analysis onto a reference subspace," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 32(3-4), pages 395-410, January.
    7. Justin L. Kern, 2017. "On the Correspondence Between Procrustes Analysis and Bidimensional Regression," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 34(1), pages 35-48, April.
    8. Angela Andreella & Livio Finos, 2022. "Procrustes Analysis for High-Dimensional Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1422-1438, December.
    9. Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Wedel, M., 1996. "A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Multidimensional Scaling Methods," Research Memorandum 725, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Meyners, M. & Kunert, Joachim & Qannari, El Mostafa, 1998. "Comparing Generalized Procrustes Analysis and STATIS," Technical Reports 1998,35, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    11. Kohei Adachi, 2013. "Generalized joint Procrustes analysis," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 2449-2464, December.
    12. Meyners, Michael & Qannari, El Mostafa, 2001. "Relating principal component analysis on merged data sets to a regression approach," Technical Reports 2001,47, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    13. Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Wedel, M., 1996. "A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Multidimensional Scaling Methods," Other publications TiSEM f72cc9d8-f370-43aa-a224-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Kensuke Okada & Shin-ichi Mayekawa, 2018. "Post-processing of Markov chain Monte Carlo output in Bayesian latent variable models with application to multidimensional scaling," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 1457-1473, September.
    15. Ab Mooijaart & Jacques Commandeur, 1990. "A general solution of the weighted orthonormal procrustes problem," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 657-663, December.
    16. Henk Kiers, 1997. "Techniques for rotating two or more loading matrices to optimal agreement and simple structure: A comparison and some technical details," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 545-568, December.
    17. Rik Pieters & Hans Baumgartner, 2002. "Who Talks to Whom? Intra- and Interdisciplinary Communication of Economics Journals," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 40(2), pages 483-509, June.
    18. Jos Berge & Dirk Knol, 1984. "Orthogonal rotations to maximal agreement for two or more matrices of different column orders," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(1), pages 49-55, March.
    19. Aslanidis, Nektarios, 2007. "Business Cycle Regimes in CEECs Production: A Threshold SURE Approach," Working Papers 2072/5318, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    20. Juliana Martins Ruzante & Valerie J. Davidson & Julie Caswell & Aamir Fazil & John A. L. Cranfield & Spencer J. Henson & Sven M. Anders & Claudia Schmidt & Jeffrey M. Farber, 2010. "A Multifactorial Risk Prioritization Framework for Foodborne Pathogens," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 724-742, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:5:p:1961-1968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.