IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v58y2021i4d10.1007_s12597-021-00510-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The wind power scheduling problem

Author

Listed:
  • T. R. Lalita

    (Indian Statistical Institute)

  • G. S. R. Murthy

    (Indian Statistical Institute)

Abstract

The importance of renewable energy cannot be overstated. Several nations are coming together in promoting green energy. One of the promotional schemes of the Indian government is the exchange of power under the inter state transmission system. This study deals with a decision-making problem for a large paper manufacturing company in India that exchanges its windmill energy under this scheme. The problem is a challenging combinatorial optimization problem with a quadratic objective function and intricate relationships among decision variables. It is different from the usual decision making problems that are encountered in the literature. In this article, we present a solution methodology and show that the solutions obtained are $$\epsilon$$ ϵ -optimal. Several live instances of the problem are solved and the results are presented and discussed. Both the formulation and the solution approach are innovative.

Suggested Citation

  • T. R. Lalita & G. S. R. Murthy, 2021. "The wind power scheduling problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(4), pages 810-834, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:58:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s12597-021-00510-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-021-00510-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-021-00510-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-021-00510-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lalita, T.R. & Manna, D.K. & Murthy, G.S.R., 2020. "Mathematical formulations for large scale check-in counter allocation problem," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Abujarad, Saleh Y. & Mustafa, M.W. & Jamian, J.J., 2017. "Recent approaches of unit commitment in the presence of intermittent renewable energy resources: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 215-223.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. T. R. Lalita & G. S. R. Murthy, 2022. "Compact ILP formulations for a class of solutions to berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 413-439, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jinda & Zhou, Zhigang & Zhao, Jianing & Zheng, Jinfu, 2018. "Improving wind power integration by a novel short-term dispatch model based on free heat storage and exhaust heat recycling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 940-953.
    2. Vasilios A. Tsalavoutis & Constantinos G. Vrionis & Athanasios I. Tolis, 2021. "Optimizing a unit commitment problem using an evolutionary algorithm and a plurality of priority lists," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-54, March.
    3. Gerrit Erichsen & Tobias Zimmermann & Alfons Kather, 2019. "Effect of Different Interval Lengths in a Rolling Horizon MILP Unit Commitment with Non-Linear Control Model for a Small Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Junjie Jia & Nan Yang & Chao Xing & Haoze Chen & Songkai Liu & Yuehua Huang & Binxin Zhu, 2019. "An Improved Constrained Order Optimization Algorithm for Uncertain SCUC Problem Solving," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Marcin Pluta & Artur Wyrwa & Wojciech Suwała & Janusz Zyśk & Maciej Raczyński & Stanisław Tokarski, 2020. "A Generalized Unit Commitment and Economic Dispatch Approach for Analysing the Polish Power System under High Renewable Penetration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Mahler, Valentin & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, Georges, 2022. "Data-driven structural modeling of electricity price dynamics," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    7. Ying Liu & Xiuqing Yang & Yong Xiang & Yi Chen & Gang Mao & Xinzhi Zhou, 2022. "Allocation and optimization of shared self-service check-in system based on integer programming model," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 532-556, August.
    8. Zheng, Lingwei & Zhou, Xingqiu & Qiu, Qi & Yang, Lan, 2020. "Day-ahead optimal dispatch of an integrated energy system considering time-frequency characteristics of renewable energy source output," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    9. Massrur, Hamid Reza & Niknam, Taher & Aghaei, Jamshid & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João P.S., 2018. "A stochastic mid-term scheduling for integrated wind-thermal systems using self-adaptive optimization approach: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 552-564.
    10. Alsnosy Balbaa & R. A. Swief & Noha H. El-Amary, 2019. "Smart Integration Based on Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization Technique for Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction in Eco-Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Abdi, Hamdi, 2021. "Profit-based unit commitment problem: A review of models, methods, challenges, and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. Cebulla, F. & Fichter, T., 2017. "Merit order or unit-commitment: How does thermal power plant modeling affect storage demand in energy system models?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 117-132.
    13. Erica Ocampo & Yen-Chih Huang & Cheng-Chien Kuo, 2020. "Feasible Reserve in Day-Ahead Unit Commitment Using Scenario-Based Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Zhiwei Li & Tianran Jin & Shuqiang Zhao & Jinshan Liu, 2018. "Power System Day-Ahead Unit Commitment Based on Chance-Constrained Dependent Chance Goal Programming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Andersen, Anders N. & Østergaard, Poul Alberg, 2019. "Analytic versus solver-based calculated daily operations of district energy plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 333-344.
    16. Forbes, M.A. & Harris, M.G. & Jansen, H.M. & van der Schoot, F.A. & Taimre, T., 2024. "Combining optimisation and simulation using logic-based Benders decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 840-854.
    17. Konneh, Keifa Vamba & Adewuyi, Oludamilare Bode & Gamil, Mahmoud M. & Fazli, Agha Mohammad & Senjyu, Tomonobu, 2023. "A scenario-based multi-attribute decision making approach for optimal design of a hybrid off-grid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    18. Rajitha Udawalpola & Taisuke Masuta & Taisei Yoshioka & Kohei Takahashi & Hideaki Ohtake, 2021. "Reduction of Power Imbalances Using Battery Energy Storage System in a Bulk Power System with Extremely Large Photovoltaics Interactions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, January.
    19. Luís A. C. Roque & Dalila B. M. M. Fontes & Fernando A. C. C. Fontes, 2017. "A Metaheuristic Approach to the Multi-Objective Unit Commitment Problem Combining Economic and Environmental Criteria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Saleh Abujarad & Mohd Wazir Mustafa & Jasrul Jamani Jamian & Abdirahman M. Abdilahi & Jeroen D. M. De Kooning & Jan Desmet & Lieven Vandevelde, 2020. "An Adjusted Weight Metric to Quantify Flexibility Available in Conventional Generators for Low Carbon Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:58:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s12597-021-00510-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.