IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v56y2019i3d10.1007_s12597-019-00381-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel approach to determine the cell formation using heuristics approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shruti Shashikumar

    (K.J. Somaiya College of Engineering)

  • Rakesh D. Raut

    (National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE))

  • Vaibhav S. Narwane

    (Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute (VJTI))

  • Bhaskar B. Gardas

    (Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute (VJTI))

  • Balkrishna E. Narkhede

    (National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE))

  • Anjali Awasthi

    (Concordia University)

Abstract

Cellular manufacturing is a vital part of lean manufacturing. It is an application of group technology. Three problems in cellular manufacturing are cell formation, machine layout and cell layout problems. However, these problems are NP-hard optimisation problems and cannot be solved using exact methods. A difficult part is to form the machine groups or cells, also called Cell Formation Problem and several techniques have been proposed to solve the same. In this paper, the Cell Formation Problem is solved using an integrated approach of heuristics along with Genetic Algorithm and Membership Index. Heuristics technique is used for domain selection which is used in Genetic Algorithm as the initial population. Genetic Algorithm is useful for optimising the results of machine assignment to cells, and Membership Index is used to assign parts to the cells. The performance is analysed using performance measures such as group technology efficiency and some exceptional elements. The proposed computational methodology is tested on standard problems of diverse size from literature papers using the hybrid approach. Results from test problems show that the proposed method is effective and efficient. The paper is useful from the practicality aspect and also relevant from current research and industry trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Shruti Shashikumar & Rakesh D. Raut & Vaibhav S. Narwane & Bhaskar B. Gardas & Balkrishna E. Narkhede & Anjali Awasthi, 2019. "A novel approach to determine the cell formation using heuristics approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(3), pages 628-656, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:56:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s12597-019-00381-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-019-00381-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-019-00381-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-019-00381-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John M. Mulvey & Harlan P. Crowder, 1979. "Cluster Analysis: An Application of Lagrangian Relaxation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 329-340, April.
    2. Venugopal, V. & Narendran, T. T., 1992. "Cell formation in manufacturing systems through simulated annealing: An experimental evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 409-422, December.
    3. Antonio Costa & Fulvio Antonio Cappadonna & Sergio Fichera, 2017. "A hybrid genetic algorithm for minimizing makespan in a flow-shop sequence-dependent group scheduling problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1269-1283, August.
    4. W.E. Wilhelm & C.C. Chiou & D.B. Chang, 1998. "Integrating design and planning considerations in cellular manufacturing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 77(0), pages 97-107, January.
    5. I. Jerin Leno & S. Saravana Sankar & S. G. Ponnambalam, 2018. "MIP model and elitist strategy hybrid GA–SA algorithm for layout design," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 369-387, February.
    6. Ravi Kumar & Surya Prakash Singh, 2017. "Designing robust stochastic bi-objective cellular layout in manufacturing systems," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 147-164.
    7. Yong Yin & Kathryn E. Stecke & Dongni Li, 2018. "The evolution of production systems from Industry 2.0 through Industry 4.0," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 848-861, January.
    8. Vishwanath Ramabhatta & Rakesh Nagi, 1998. "An integrated formulation of manufacturing cell formation with capacity planning and multiple routings," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 77(0), pages 79-95, January.
    9. Irina E. Utkina & Mikhail V. Batsyn & Ekaterina K. Batsyna, 2018. "A branch-and-bound algorithm for the cell formation problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(9), pages 3262-3273, May.
    10. John S. Morris & Richard J. Tersine, 1990. "A Simulation Analysis of Factors Influencing the Attractiveness of Group Technology Cellular Layouts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(12), pages 1567-1578, December.
    11. Xambre, Ana R. & Vilarinho, Pedro M., 2003. "A simulated annealing approach for manufacturing cell formation with multiple identical machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(2), pages 434-446, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & N Safaei & F Sassani, 2008. "A new solution for a dynamic cell formation problem with alternative routing and machine costs using simulated annealing," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(4), pages 443-454, April.
    2. Dung-Ying Lin & Tzu-Yun Huang, 2021. "A Hybrid Metaheuristic for the Unrelated Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, April.
    3. M Diaby & A L Nsakanda, 2006. "Large-scale capacitated part-routing in the presence of process and routing flexibilities and setup costs," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(9), pages 1100-1112, September.
    4. Zhang, Zhe & Song, Xiaoling & Gong, Xue & Yin, Yong & Lev, Benjamin & Zhou, Xiaoyang, 2024. "Coordinated seru scheduling and distribution operation problems with DeJong’s learning effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 452-464.
    5. Boutsinas, Basilis, 2013. "Machine-part cell formation using biclustering," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 563-572.
    6. Lili Wang & Min Li & Guanbin Kong & Haiwen Xu, 2024. "Joint decision-making for divisional seru scheduling and worker assignment considering process sequence constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 1157-1185, July.
    7. Marić, Josip & Opazo-Basáez, Marco & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2023. "Innovation management of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology: Disclosing insights from existing literature and determining future research streams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Li, Dongni & Jiang, Yuzhou & Zhang, Jinhui & Cui, Zihua & Yin, Yong, 2023. "An on-line seru scheduling algorithm with proactive waiting considering resource conflicts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 506-515.
    9. O. Mahesh & G. Srinivasan, 2006. "Multi-objectives for incremental cell formation problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 157-170, March.
    10. Chien-Liang Chiu & I-Fan Hsiao & Lily Chang, 2023. "Overviewing Global Surface Temperature Changes Regarding CO 2 Emission, Population Density, and Energy Consumption in the Industry: Policy Suggestions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Kulkarni, Girish & Fathi, Yahya, 2007. "Integer programming models for the q-mode problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 612-625, October.
    12. Chen, Ja-Shen & Heragu, Sunderesh S., 1999. "Stepwise decomposition approaches for large scale cell formation problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 64-79, February.
    13. Konstantinos S. Boulas & Georgios D. Dounias & Chrissoleon T. Papadopoulos, 2023. "A hybrid evolutionary algorithm approach for estimating the throughput of short reliable approximately balanced production lines," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 823-852, February.
    14. Safaei, N. & Saidi-Mehrabad, M. & Jabal-Ameli, M.S., 2008. "A hybrid simulated annealing for solving an extended model of dynamic cellular manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 563-592, March.
    15. Chen, Mu-Chen & Wu, Hsiao-Pin, 2005. "An association-based clustering approach to order batching considering customer demand patterns," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 333-343, August.
    16. Hassan, Mohsen M. D., 1995. "Layout design in group technology manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(2-3), pages 173-188, March.
    17. Gambella, Claudio & Ghaddar, Bissan & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe, 2021. "Optimization problems for machine learning: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 807-828.
    18. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco & Tarba, Shlomo, 2022. "Exploring the interplay between Smart Manufacturing and KIBS firms in configuring product-service innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    19. D'Alfonso, Thomas H. & Ventura, Jose A., 1995. "Assignment of tools to machines in a flexible manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 115-133, February.
    20. Lau, Kin-nam & Leung, Pui-lam & Tse, Ka-kit, 1999. "A mathematical programming approach to clusterwise regression model and its extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(3), pages 640-652, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:56:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s12597-019-00381-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.