IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14946-d1261123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation-Based Study of the Resilience of Flexible Manufacturing Layouts Subject to Uncertain Demands of Product Variants

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Li

    (Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Bahareh Eshragh

    (Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Akposeiyifa Joseph Ebufegha

    (Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

Abstract

Due to market competition, manufacturers typically produce their products with different customized features, leading to the production of product variants (or a product family). Since the market trend can change swiftly, the demands of individual product variants can be difficult to predict. Two flexible manufacturing layouts are commonly considered: functional and cellular layouts. While the functional layout is more resilient to demand changes due to better resource pooling, the cellular layout can be more productive on some occasions due to better routing efficiency. In this context, the purpose of this paper is to quantify and study the criticality of product variants. The criticality score of a product variant can estimate and rank which product variants can sensitively cause bottlenecks in the functional and cellular layouts. The proposed criticality analysis starts with the estimation of bottleneck machines. Through the dependency information of machines and parts, we can estimate the criticality of product variants. The criticality analysis is demonstrated and examined through a simulation study with a study case involving the production of five furniture products with 16 unique parts using 11 machines. The simulation results show that the productions with more critical product variants tend to deteriorate the completion time of the cellular layout more severely. In practice, manufacturers can use the proposed criticality analysis to evaluate the criticality of product variants and support their facility layout decision. For example, if more demand for critical products is expected, the layout should support more resource pooling (e.g., functional layouts).

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Li & Bahareh Eshragh & Akposeiyifa Joseph Ebufegha, 2023. "Simulation-Based Study of the Resilience of Flexible Manufacturing Layouts Subject to Uncertain Demands of Product Variants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14946-:d:1261123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14946/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14946/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2016. "Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 306-324.
    2. Agarwal, Atul, 2008. "Partitioning bottleneck work center for cellular manufacturing: An integrated performance and cost model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 635-647, February.
    3. Ivanov Vitalii & Liaposhchenko Oleksandr & Denysenko Yuliia & Pavlenko Ivan, 2021. "Ensuring economic efficiency of flexible fixtures in multiproduct manufacturing," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 53-62, March.
    4. Luka Celent & Marko Mladineo & Nikola Gjeldum & Marina Crnjac Zizic, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Smart and Sustainable Machining Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Anupma Yadav & S.C. Jayswal, 2018. "Modelling of flexible manufacturing system: a review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(7), pages 2464-2487, April.
    6. Yong Yin & Kathryn E. Stecke & Dongni Li, 2018. "The evolution of production systems from Industry 2.0 through Industry 4.0," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 848-861, January.
    7. Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Sridhar R. Tayur, 1998. "Managing Broader Product Lines through Delayed Differentiation Using Vanilla Boxes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-2), pages 161-172, December.
    8. Safaei, Nima & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2009. "Integrated multi-period cell formation and subcontracting production planning in dynamic cellular manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 301-314, August.
    9. C.-T. Kuo & J.-T. Lim & S. M. Meerkov, 1996. "Bottlenecks in serial production lines: A system-theoretic approach," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2, pages 1-44, January.
    10. Sonia Irshad Mari & Young Hae Lee & Muhammad Saad Memon, 2016. "Sustainable and Resilient Garment Supply Chain Network Design with Fuzzy Multi-Objectives under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    2. Luis Francisco López-Castro & Elyn L. Solano-Charris, 2021. "Integrating Resilience and Sustainability Criteria in the Supply Chain Network Design. A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Guo, Daqiang & Li, Mingxing & Lyu, Zhongyuan & Kang, Kai & Wu, Wei & Zhong, Ray Y. & Huang, George Q., 2021. "Synchroperation in industry 4.0 manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    4. Chih-Hung Hsu & Ming-Ge Li & Ting-Yi Zhang & An-Yuan Chang & Shu-Zhen Shangguan & Wan-Ling Liu, 2022. "Deploying Big Data Enablers to Strengthen Supply Chain Resilience to Mitigate Sustainable Risks Based on Integrated HOQ-MCDM Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-35, April.
    5. Jahani, Hamed & Abbasi, Babak & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Klibi, Walid, 2024. "Supply chain network design with financial considerations: A comprehensive review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 799-839.
    6. Govindan, Kannan & Gholizadeh, Hadi, 2021. "Robust network design for sustainable-resilient reverse logistics network using big data: A case study of end-of-life vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    7. Marta Negri & Enrico Cagno & Claudia Colicchia & Joseph Sarkis, 2021. "Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2858-2886, November.
    8. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    9. Zhang, Zhe & Song, Xiaoling & Gong, Xue & Yin, Yong & Lev, Benjamin & Zhou, Xiaoyang, 2024. "Coordinated seru scheduling and distribution operation problems with DeJong’s learning effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 452-464.
    10. Lili Wang & Min Li & Guanbin Kong & Haiwen Xu, 2024. "Joint decision-making for divisional seru scheduling and worker assignment considering process sequence constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 1157-1185, July.
    11. Işık Biçer & Florian Lücker & Tamer Boyacı, 2022. "Beyond Retail Stores: Managing Product Proliferation along the Supply Chain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1135-1156, March.
    12. Fay, Scott & Mitra, Deb & Wang, Qiong, 2009. "Ask or infer? Strategic implications of alternative learning approaches in customization," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 136-152.
    13. Willem van Jaarsveld & Alan Scheller-Wolf, 2015. "Optimization of Industrial-Scale Assemble-to-Order Systems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 544-560, August.
    14. Marić, Josip & Opazo-Basáez, Marco & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2023. "Innovation management of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology: Disclosing insights from existing literature and determining future research streams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Li, Dongni & Jiang, Yuzhou & Zhang, Jinhui & Cui, Zihua & Yin, Yong, 2023. "An on-line seru scheduling algorithm with proactive waiting considering resource conflicts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 506-515.
    16. Chien-Liang Chiu & I-Fan Hsiao & Lily Chang, 2023. "Overviewing Global Surface Temperature Changes Regarding CO 2 Emission, Population Density, and Energy Consumption in the Industry: Policy Suggestions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Kai-Lung Hui, 2004. "Product Variety Under Brand Influence: An Empirical Investigation of Personal Computer Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 686-700, May.
    18. Miguel Reyna-Castillo & Alejandro Santiago & Salvador Ibarra Martínez & José Antonio Castán Rocha, 2022. "Social Sustainability and Resilience in Supply Chains of Latin America on COVID-19 Times: Classification Using Evolutionary Fuzzy Knowledge," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2021. "Strategic substitutes or complements? The relationship between capacity sharing and postponement flexibility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 138-148.
    20. Matteo De Marchi & Fanny Friedrich & Michael Riedl & Hartmut Zadek & Erwin Rauch, 2023. "Development of a Resilience Assessment Model for Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-29, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14946-:d:1261123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.