IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v24y2024i2d10.1007_s12351-024-00826-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Game-theoretic analysis of competition between access service providers utilizing a Nash genetic algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Kamalakis

    (Harokopio University of Athens)

  • Georgia Dede

    (Harokopio University of Athens)

  • Christos Michalakelis

    (Harokopio University of Athens)

  • Mara Nikolaidou

    (Harokopio University of Athens)

Abstract

Fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) technology is a promising solution for providing advanced service delivery to end-users, but its implementation requires substantial capital expenditures. To minimize investment risks and aid decision-making for access service providers, we propose a game theoretic framework based on a modified Nash genetic algorithm. We illustrate how this framework can be applied to analyze the competition between access providers offering a flat-rate FTTH service on multiple geographical areas. Each provider determines its price for all areas simultaneously and decides whether to invest on a particular area depending on the anticipated revenues. Two distinct demand models are adopted to describe different types of consumer behavior. A solution engine, based on a modified mixed-variable Nash genetic algorithm is implemented under an open-source license. The significance and practical implications of the equilibrium points obtained for both single and multiple area games are discussed. The proposed framework and the solution engine developed, aid both providers and regulatory bodies to analyze competitive environments. They can also be used to implement decision support tools for similar problems as well. The paper concludes by pointing out further research directions in this context.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Kamalakis & Georgia Dede & Christos Michalakelis & Mara Nikolaidou, 2024. "Game-theoretic analysis of competition between access service providers utilizing a Nash genetic algorithm," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:24:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-024-00826-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-024-00826-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-024-00826-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-024-00826-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarina Valaskova & Marek Durica & Maria Kovacova & Elena Gregova & George Lazaroiu, 2019. "Oligopolistic Competition among Providers in the Telecommunication Industry: The Case of Slovakia," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Hsi Tse Wang, 2020. "Discussion of the Competitive Strategies of Telecom Operators and Over-the-Top Service Providers from the Perspective of Evolutionary Game Theory," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 260-275, September.
    3. Hongmin Li & Scott Webster & Nicholas Mason & Karl Kempf, 2019. "Product-Line Pricing Under Discrete Mixed Multinomial Logit Demand," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 14-28, January.
    4. Omar Besbes & Denis Sauré, 2016. "Product Assortment and Price Competition under Multinomial Logit Demand," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(1), pages 114-127, January.
    5. Samanatha Doove & Owen Gabbitas & Duc Nguyen-Hong & Joe Owen, 2001. "Price Effects of Regulation: Telecommunications, Air Passenger Transport and Electricity Supply," Others 0110004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Martin Shubik, 2002. "Game Theory and Operations Research: Some Musings 50 Years Later," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 192-196, February.
    7. Jiasen Sun & Yelin Fu & Xiang Ji & Ray Y. Zhong, 2017. "Allocation of emission permits using DEA-game-theoretic model," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 867-884, October.
    8. Aggelos Skoufis & Georgios Chatzithanasis & Georgia Dede & Thomas Kamalakis & Christos Michalakelis, 2020. "Technoeconomic analysis of a VDSL2/G.fast vectoring network: a case study from Greece," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 83-101, December.
    9. Adler, Nicole & Brudner, Amir & Proost, Stef, 2021. "A review of transport market modeling using game-theoretic principles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 808-829.
    10. Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Mahsa Noori-daryan, 2016. "Pricing, inventory and production policies in a supply chain of pharmacological products with rework process: a game theoretic approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 89-115, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph Francois & Bernard Hoekman, 2010. "Services Trade and Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(3), pages 642-692, September.
    2. World Bank, 2009. "The Service Revolution in South Asia," World Bank Publications - Reports 19332, The World Bank Group.
    3. Aggelos Skoufis & Georgios Chatzithanasis & Georgia Dede & Evangelia Filiopoulou & Thomas Kamalakis & Christos Michalakelis, 2023. "Technoeconomic assessment of an FTTH network investment in the Greek telecommunications market," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 82(2), pages 211-227, February.
    4. Wenke Wang & Xiaoqiong You & Kebei Liu & Yenchun Jim Wu & Daming You, 2020. "Implementation of a Multi-Agent Carbon Emission Reduction Strategy under the Chinese Dual Governance System: An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Ruxian Wang & Maqbool Dada & Ozge Sahin, 2019. "Pricing Ancillary Service Subscriptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4712-4732, October.
    6. Gehlhar, Mark & Wainio, John, 2004. "Feasibility of Reducing Agricultural Protection: Implications for Farm Households," Conference papers 331293, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Chu, Junfei & Hou, Tianteng & Li, Feng & Yuan, Zhe, 2024. "Dynamic bargaining game DEA carbon emissions abatement allocation and the Nash equilibrium," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Alan V. Deardorff & Robert M. Stern, 2009. "Empirical Analysis of Barriers to International Services Transactions and the Consequences of Liberalization," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Globalization And International Trade Policies, chapter 15, pages 523-595, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. Emami, Maryam & Haghshenas, Hossein & Talebian, Ahmadreza & Kermanshahi, Shahab, 2022. "A game theoretic approach to study the impact of transportation policies on the competition between transit and private car in the urban context," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 320-337.
    10. Ali Salmasnia & Ali Talesh-Kazemi, 2022. "Integrating inventory planning, pricing and maintenance for perishable products in a two-component parallel manufacturing system with common cause failures," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1235-1265, April.
    11. Svetla Stoilova, 2024. "An Integrated SIMUS–Game Theory Approach for Sustainable Decision Making—An Application for Route and Transport Operator Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-31, October.
    12. Anca D. Cristea & Russell Hillberry & Aaditya Mattoo, 2015. "Open Skies over the Middle East," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 1650-1681, November.
    13. Bo Peng & Kun Lei, 2021. "An Analytical Approach for Initial Allocation of Discharge Permits with Consideration of the Water Environmental Capacity and Industrial Technical Feasibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Mohammad Reza Gholamian & Mahdi Ebrahimzadeh-Afruzi, 2021. "Credit and discount incentive options for two-level supply chain coordination, under uncertain price-dependent demand," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 2283-2307, December.
    15. Xu, Xiaoyan & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho & Guo, Shu, 2023. "Collaborative-commerce in supply chains: A review and classification of analytical models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    16. World Bank, 2009. "Tunisia's Global Integration : A Second Generation of Reforms to Boost Growth and Employment," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6298.
    17. Jiasen Sun & Guo Li, 2022. "Optimizing emission reduction task sharing: technology and performance perspectives," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 581-602, September.
    18. Martin Grancay & Nora Szikorova, 2014. "Liberalism in Foreign Trade versus Liberalism in Air Transportation - Is there a Link?," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 61(6), pages 709-721, December.
    19. Heatley, David & Howell, Bronwyn, 2010. "Overseas Investment: is New Zealand 'Open for Business'?," Working Paper Series 19157, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    20. Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Milad Shahriari & Shib Sankar Sana, 2021. "Pricing and Coordination Strategies in a Dual Channel Supply Chain with Green Production under Cap and Trade Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:24:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-024-00826-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.