IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v20y2020i3d10.1007_s12351-018-0385-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tactical production planning in a hybrid MTS/MTO system using Stackelberg game

Author

Listed:
  • Helia Yousefnejad

    (Alzahra University)

  • Maryam Esmaeili

    (Alzahra University)

Abstract

In this paper, a pricing and lead time determination problem, is investigated in a hybrid MTS/MTO production environment using Stackelberg game. A manufacturing company with three types of products including MTS, MTS/MTO and MTO and a manufacturing system consists of one common and one differentiation stage is considered. Due to the conflict of interests between these two stages, the decision making sequence is modelled using a Stackelberg game where the differentiation and the common stages are considered to be leader and follower, respectively. The company aims to satisfy the demand of MTS products along with on time delivery of MTS/MTO and MTO orders. The optimal order price and delivery time are suggested to be obtained from a profit maximization model, where the market demand is affected by these two values. Finally, a simulation model is conducted to examine the effectiveness of the proposed model and also to implement a sensitivity analysis on the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Helia Yousefnejad & Maryam Esmaeili, 2020. "Tactical production planning in a hybrid MTS/MTO system using Stackelberg game," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1791-1809, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:20:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s12351-018-0385-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-018-0385-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-018-0385-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-018-0385-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Donk, Dirk Pieter, 2001. "Make to stock or make to order: The decoupling point in the food processing industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 297-306, February.
    2. Iman Ghalehkhondabi & Ehsan Ardjmand & Gary Weckman, 2017. "Integrated decision making model for pricing and locating the customer order decoupling point of a newsvendor supply chain," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(2), pages 417-439, June.
    3. Soman, Chetan Anil & van Donk, Dirk Pieter & Gaalman, Gerard, 2004. "Combined make-to-order and make-to-stock in a food production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 223-235, July.
    4. Soman, Chetan Anil & Pieter van Donk, Dirk & Gaalman, Gerard, 2006. "Comparison of dynamic scheduling policies for hybrid make-to-order and make-to-stock production systems with stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 441-453, December.
    5. Lin, Hung-Tso & Chang, Wen-Ling, 2008. "Order selection and pricing methods using flexible quantity and fuzzy approach for buyer evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 415-428, June.
    6. Easton, Fred F. & Moodie, Douglas R., 1999. "Pricing and lead time decisions for make-to-order firms with contingent orders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 305-318, July.
    7. So, Kut C. & Song, Jing-Sheng, 1998. "Price, delivery time guarantees and capacity selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 28-49, November.
    8. Hendry, L. C. & Kingsman, B. G., 1989. "Production planning systems and their applicability to make-to-order companies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Ebadian, M. & Rabbani, M. & Jolai, F. & Torabi, S.A. & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., 2008. "A new decision-making structure for the order entry stage in make-to-order environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 351-367, February.
    10. Olhager, Jan, 2003. "Strategic positioning of the order penetration point," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 319-329, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiang, Lan & Meng, Ming, 2024. "Optimal production decision of hybrid power generation enterprises in multi-quota policy coupled markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shouyao Xiong & Yuanyuan Feng & Kai Huang, 2020. "Optimal MTS and MTO Hybrid Production System for a Single Product Under the Cap-And-Trade Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Sharda, Bikram & Akiya, Naoko, 2012. "Selecting make-to-stock and postponement policies for different products in a chemical plant: A case study using discrete event simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 161-171.
    3. Iman Ghalehkhondabi & Dusan Sormaz & Gary Weckman, 2016. "Multiple customer order decoupling points within a hybrid MTS/MTO manufacturing supply chain with uncertain demands in two consecutive echelons," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 976-997, December.
    4. Kerkkanen, Annastiina, 2007. "Determining semi-finished products to be stocked when changing the MTS-MTO policy: Case of a steel mill," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 111-118, July.
    5. Beemsterboer, Bart & Land, Martin & Teunter, Ruud, 2016. "Hybrid MTO-MTS production planning: An explorative study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 453-461.
    6. Surbhi Upadhyay & Suresh Kumar Garg & Rishu Sharma, 2023. "Analyzing the Factors for Implementing Make-to-Order Manufacturing System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Luo, Hao & Yang, Xuan & Kong, Xiang T.R., 2019. "A synchronized production-warehouse management solution for reengineering the online-offline integrated order fulfillment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 211-230.
    8. Sun, X.Y. & Ji, P. & Sun, L.Y. & Wang, Y.L., 2008. "Positioning multiple decoupling points in a supply network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 943-956, June.
    9. Akkerman, Renzo & van Donk, Dirk Pieter, 2009. "Product mix variability with correlated demand in two-stage food manufacturing with intermediate storage," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 313-322, October.
    10. Romsdal, Anita & Strandhagen, Jan Ola & Dreyer, Heidi Carin, 2014. "Can Differentiated Production Planning and Control enable both Responsiveness and Efficiency in Food Production?," 2014 International European Forum, February 17-21, 2014, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 199374, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    11. Martínez-Olvera, César, 2009. "Benefits of using hybrid business models within a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 501-511, August.
    12. Jeong, In-Jae, 2011. "A dynamic model for the optimization of decoupling point and production planning in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 561-567, June.
    13. Zhi-Long Chen & Nicholas G. Hall, 2010. "The Coordination of Pricing and Scheduling Decisions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 77-92, April.
    14. Li, Xueping & Wang, Jiao & Sawhney, Rapinder, 2012. "Reinforcement learning for joint pricing, lead-time and scheduling decisions in make-to-order systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 99-109.
    15. Mihiotis A., 2014. "Management of Supply Chain: X-to-order Concepts vs Make-to-stock Model," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(3), pages 30-33, May.
    16. Stevenson, Mark & Hendry, Linda C., 2006. "Aggregate load-oriented workload control: A review and a re-classification of a key approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 676-693, December.
    17. Cannas, Violetta G. & Gosling, Jonathan & Pero, Margherita & Rossi, Tommaso, 2020. "Determinants for order-fulfilment strategies in engineer-to-order companies: Insights from the machinery industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Abhijit Upasani & Reha Uzsoy, 2008. "Incorporating manufacturing lead times in joint production-marketing models: A review and some future directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 171-188, July.
    19. Beemsterboer, Bart & Land, Martin & Teunter, Ruud & Bokhorst, Jos, 2017. "Integrating make-to-order and make-to-stock in job shop control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1-10.
    20. Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2009. "Engineer-to-order supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 741-754, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:20:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s12351-018-0385-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.