IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v134y2024ics0140988324003323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal production decision of hybrid power generation enterprises in multi-quota policy coupled markets

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Lan
  • Meng, Ming

Abstract

At present, China is adopting both Carbon Emission Trading (CET) and Tradable Green Certificate (TGC) markets to optimize the resource allocation of its power industry. To mitigate the impacts of the above dual markets, more and more power generation enterprises are adopting hybrid production mode, generating electricity from thermal and new energy units simultaneously. In these complex production and market conditions, enterprises are difficult to arrange their generation activities. This research describes the production decision process of hybrid power generation enterprises with different market positions, obtains their optimal yield, and then offers market equilibrium results. In addition, the consequences of enterprise collusion behaviors and government interventions are also measured. Numerical experiment results confirm the correctness of the production decision model and reveal the following facts: 1) CET and TGC markets effectively control the carbon emission level and promote the consumption of new energy, but magnify the failure of electricity market to a certain extent. 2) CET and TGC markets promote each other in function. The existence of one market can help the other to achieve the anticipated goal. 3) Enterprises first offset the impact of market condition changes by adjusting the share of new energy generation, and then digest the residual influence by adjusting the total power generation. 4) Enterprise collusion behaviors aggravate the welfare loss of electricity consumer and then lower the expected effects of CET and TGC markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Lan & Meng, Ming, 2024. "Optimal production decision of hybrid power generation enterprises in multi-quota policy coupled markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:134:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324003323
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324003323
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang, Xin & Wu, Zhaoyuan & Wang, Jingting & Zhang, Xingyu & Zhou, Ming & Yu, Tao & Wang, Yuyang, 2023. "The coupling effect of carbon emission trading and tradable green certificates under electricity marketization in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Jinye Zhao & Benjamin F. Hobbs & Jong-Shi Pang, 2010. "Long-Run Equilibrium Modeling of Emissions Allowance Allocation Systems in Electric Power Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 529-548, June.
    3. Marchenko, O.V., 2008. "Modeling of a green certificate market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1953-1958.
    4. Schusser, Sandra & Jaraitė, Jūratė, 2018. "Explaining the interplay of three markets: Green certificates, carbon emissions and electricity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-13.
    5. Yan, Yue & Sun, Mei & Guo, Zhilong, 2022. "How do carbon cap-and-trade mechanisms and renewable portfolio standards affect renewable energy investment?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    6. Ru Li & Sigit Perdana & Marc Vielle, 2021. "Potential integration of Chinese and European emissions trading market: welfare distribution analysis," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1-28, June.
    7. Georg Meran & Nadine Wittmann, 2012. "Green, Brown, and Now White Certificates: Are Three One Too Many? A Micro-Model of Market Interaction," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 53(4), pages 507-532, December.
    8. Feng, Tian-tian & Yang, Yi-sheng & Yang, Yu-heng, 2018. "What will happen to the power supply structure and CO2 emissions reduction when TGC meets CET in the electricity market in China?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 121-132.
    9. Jian Yao & Ilan Adler & Shmuel S. Oren, 2008. "Modeling and Computing Two-Settlement Oligopolistic Equilibrium in a Congested Electricity Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 34-47, February.
    10. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2019. "What will China's carbon emission trading market affect with only electricity sector involvement? A CGE based study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 301-311.
    11. Fonseca, Miguel A. & Gonçalves, Ricardo & Pinho, Joana & Tabacco, Giovanni A., 2022. "How do antitrust regimes impact on cartel formation and managers’ labor market? An experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 643-662.
    12. Qingyou Yan & Xingbei Ai & Jinmeng Li, 2021. "Low-Carbon Economic Dispatch Based on a CCPP-P2G Virtual Power Plant Considering Carbon Trading and Green Certificates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Wang, Lin & Li, Ke, 2022. "Research on renewable energy consumption and emission reduction in power market based on bi-level decision making in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    14. Falbo, Paolo & Ruiz, Carlos, 2019. "Optimal sales-mix and generation plan in a two-stage electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 598-614.
    15. Juan Aparicio & Juan Ferrando & Ana Meca & Julia Sancho, 2008. "Strategic bidding in continuous electricity auctions: an application to the Spanish electricity market," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 229-241, February.
    16. Yao, Xin & Huang, Ruting & Du, Kerui, 2019. "The impacts of market power on power grid efficiency: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 99-110.
    17. Kunsch, P. L. & Springael, J. & Brans, J. -P., 2004. "The zero-emission certificates: A novel CO2-pollution reduction instrument applied to the electricity market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 386-399, March.
    18. Zhang, Xinhua & Zhang, Qianqian & Dai, Zhifeng & Zhang, Xiaotong, 2023. "The impact of carbon markets on the financial performance of power producers: Evidence based on China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    19. Zhang, Kun & Yao, Yun-Fei & Liang, Qiao-Mei & Saren, Gaowa, 2021. "How should China prioritize the deregulation of electricity prices in the context of carbon pricing? A computable general equilibrium analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Helia Yousefnejad & Maryam Esmaeili, 2020. "Tactical production planning in a hybrid MTS/MTO system using Stackelberg game," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1791-1809, September.
    21. Newbery, David M. & Greve, Thomas, 2017. "The strategic robustness of oligopoly electricity market models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 124-132.
    22. Scott, Ian J. & Botterud, Audun & Carvalho, Pedro M.S. & Silva, Carlos A. Santos, 2020. "Renewable energy support policy evaluation: The role of long-term uncertainty in market modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    23. Yihsu Chen & Andrew L. Liu & Benjamin F. Hobbs, 2011. "Economic and Emissions Implications of Load-Based, Source-Based, and First-Seller Emissions Trading Programs Under California AB32," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 696-712, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Jiaqian & Zheng, Xiaolin & Yu, Songmin & Yu, Lean, 2024. "Modeling multi-market coupling effects considering the consumption above quota trading market in renewable portfolio standards: An agent-based perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Zhang, Xinyue & Guo, Xiaopeng & Zhang, Xingping, 2023. "Assessing the policy synergy among power, carbon emissions trading and tradable green certificate market mechanisms on strategic GENCOs in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    3. Zhang, Xinyue & Guo, Xiaopeng & Zhang, Xingping, 2024. "Mutual conversion mechanisms for environmental interest products to jointly enhance synergistic effect between power, CET and TGC markets in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Yihsu Chen & Andrew Liu, 2013. "Emissions trading, point-of-regulation and facility siting choices in the electric markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 251-286, December.
    5. Hu, Yu & Chi, Yuanying & Zhao, Hao & Zhou, Wenbing, 2022. "The development of renewable energy industry under renewable portfolio standards: From the perspective of provincial resource differences," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Hu, Yu & Chi, Yuanying & Zhou, Wenbing & Li, Jialin & Wang, Zhengzao & Yuan, Yongke, 2023. "The interactions between renewable portfolio standards and carbon emission trading in China: An evolutionary game theory perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    7. Wang, Benke & Li, Chunhua & Ban, Yongshuang & Zhao, Zeming & Wang, Zengxu, 2024. "A two-tier bidding model considering a multi-stage offer‑carbon joint incentive clearing mechanism for coupled electricity and carbon markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    8. Fan, Jin & Wang, Shanyong & Wu, Yanrui & Li, Jun & Zhao, Dingtao, 2015. "Buffer effect and price effect of a personal carbon trading scheme," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 601-610.
    9. Sun, Yanming & Shen, Simiao & Zhou, Chuanyu, 2023. "Does the pilot emissions trading system in China promote innovation? Evidence based on green technology innovation in the energy sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. Li, Yao & Fan, Jin & Zhao, Dingtao & Wu, Yanrui & Li, Jun, 2016. "Tiered gasoline pricing: A personal carbon trading perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 194-201.
    11. Li, Jialin & Hu, Yu & Chi, Yuanying & Liu, Dunnan & Yang, Shuxia & Gao, Zhiyuan & Chen, Yuetong, 2024. "Analysis on the synergy between markets of electricity, carbon, and tradable green certificates in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    12. Dane A. Schiro & Benjamin F. Hobbs & Jong-Shi Pang, 2016. "Perfectly competitive capacity expansion games with risk-averse participants," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 511-539, November.
    13. Lefeng Cheng & Mengya Zhang & Pengrong Huang & Wentian Lu, 2024. "Game-Theoretic Approaches for Power-Generation Companies’ Decision-Making in the Emerging Green Certificate Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-53, December.
    14. Thomas D. Jeitschko & Pallavi Pal, 2021. "Curbing Price Fluctuations in Cap-and-Trade Auctions," CESifo Working Paper Series 9266, CESifo.
    15. Xu, Q. & Hobbs, B., 2020. "Economic Efficiency of Alternative Border Carbon Adjustment Schemes: A Case Study of California Carbon Pricing and the Western North American Power Market," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 20109, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    16. Lei, Xu & Xin-gang, Zhao, 2023. "The synergistic effect between Renewable Portfolio Standards and carbon emission trading system: A perspective of China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1010-1023.
    17. Fang, Debin & Zhao, Chaoyang & Kleit, Andrew N., 2019. "The impact of the under enforcement of RPS in China: An evolutionary approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Wu, Jiaqian & Chen, Yu & Yu, Lean & Li, Guohao & Li, Jingjing, 2023. "Has the evolution of renewable energy policies facilitated the construction of a new power system for China? A system dynamics analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Song, Xiao-hua & Han, Jing-jing & Zhang, Lu & Zhao, Cai-ping & Wang, Peng & Liu, Xiao-yan & Li, Qiao-chu, 2021. "Impacts of renewable portfolio standards on multi-market coupling trading of renewable energy in China: A scenario-based system dynamics model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    20. Yihsu Chen & Lizhi Wang, 2013. "Renewable Portfolio Standards in the Presence of Green Consumers and Emissions Trading," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 149-181, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:134:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324003323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.