IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v17y2017i3d10.1007_s12351-016-0226-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of F.W. Lanchester’s combat model in a supply chain in duopoly: the case of Coca-Cola and Pepsi in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Miltiadis Chalikias

    (Piraeus University of Applied Sciences (T.E.I. of Piraeus))

  • Michalis Skordoulis

    (Piraeus University of Applied Sciences (T.E.I. of Piraeus))

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the possibility of applying some of the most widely known mathematical theories of war in the case of firms. In this research, Frederick William Lanchester’s combat models, that seemed to be particularly useful to the U.S. Army at the Pacific campaign against the Japanese fleet during World War II, were examined. These mathematical models were based on differential equations and their main purpose was to predict the outcome of battles. After the appropriate theoretical assumptions were set, the examined models were applied to the case of Coca-Cola™ and Pepsi™ supply chains in the Greek market. These models have been applied to these firms by other researchers too. The results of the implementations have led to the conclusion that the theoretical models are almost identical to the reality, which means that they are applicable in business under the right conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Miltiadis Chalikias & Michalis Skordoulis, 2017. "Implementation of F.W. Lanchester’s combat model in a supply chain in duopoly: the case of Coca-Cola and Pepsi in Greece," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 737-745, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:17:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s12351-016-0226-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-016-0226-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-016-0226-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-016-0226-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gila E. Fruchter & Shlomo Kalish, 1997. "Closed-Loop Advertising Strategies in a Duopoly," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 54-63, January.
    2. Wang, Qinan & Wu, Zhang, 2001. "A duopolistic model of dynamic competitive advertising," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 213-226, January.
    3. Pradeep K. Chintagunta & Naufel J. Vilcassim, 1992. "An Empirical Investigation of Advertising Strategies in a Dynamic Duopoly," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(9), pages 1230-1244, September.
    4. Jerome Bracken, 1995. "Lanchester models of the ardennes campaign," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(4), pages 559-577, June.
    5. Gary M. Erickson, 1992. "Empirical Analysis of Closed-Loop Duopoly Advertising Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(12), pages 1732-1749, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anelí Bongers & José L. Torres, 2021. "A bottleneck combat model: an application to the Battle of Thermopylae," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 2859-2877, December.
    2. Petros Kalantonis & Sotiria Schoina & Spyros Missiakoulis & Constantin Zopounidis, 2020. "The Impact of the Disclosed R & D Expenditure on the Value Relevance of the Accounting Information: Evidence from Greek Listed Firms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Pietro De Giovanni, 2019. "Digital Supply Chain through Dynamic Inventory and Smart Contracts," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Jian & Leng, Mingming & Liang, Liping, 2012. "Recent developments in dynamic advertising research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 591-609.
    2. Wang, Qinan & Wu, Zhang, 2007. "An empirical study on the Lanchester model of combat for competitive advertising decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 871-881, December.
    3. Machowska Dominika, 2018. "Investigating the role of customer churn in the optimal allocation of offensive and defensive advertising: the case of the competitive growing market," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 3-23, June.
    4. El Ouardighi, Fouad & Pasin, Federico, 2006. "Quality improvement and goodwill accumulation in a dynamic duopoly," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 1021-1032, December.
    5. Ramla Jarrar & Guiomar Martín-Herrán & Georges Zaccour, 2004. "Markov Perfect Equilibrium Advertising Strategies of Lanchester Duopoly Model: A Technical Note," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(7), pages 995-1000, July.
    6. Fruchter, Gila E. & Kalish, Shlomo, 1998. "Dynamic promotional budgeting and media allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 15-27, November.
    7. Michèle Breton & Ramla Jarrar & Georges Zaccour, 2006. "A Note on Feedback Sequential Equilibria in a Lanchester Model with Empirical Application," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 804-811, May.
    8. Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & McQuitty, Shaun & Sigué, Simon Pierre, 2012. "Offensive versus defensive marketing: What is the optimal spending allocation?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 210-219.
    9. Gary M. Erickson, 2009. "Advertising Competition in a Dynamic Oligopoly with Multiple Brands," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1106-1113, October.
    10. Wang, Qinan & Wu, Zhang, 2001. "A duopolistic model of dynamic competitive advertising," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 213-226, January.
    11. Toker Doganoglu & Daniel Klapper, 2006. "Goodwill and dynamic advertising strategies," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 5-29, March.
    12. Dung Nguyen & Lei Shi, 2006. "Competitive Advertising Strategies and Market-Size Dynamics: A Research Note on Theory and Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 965-973, June.
    13. G. Fruchter & G. M. Erickson & S. Kalish, 2001. "Feedback Competitive Advertising Strategies with a General Objective Function," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 601-613, June.
    14. Matthew Spiegel & Heather Tookes, 2008. "Dynamic Competition, Innovation and Strategic Financing," Yale School of Management Working Papers amz2500, Yale School of Management.
    15. A. Prasad & S. P. Sethi, 2004. "Competitive Advertising Under Uncertainty: A Stochastic Differential Game Approach," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 163-185, October.
    16. Prasad A. Naik & Ashutosh Prasad & Suresh P. Sethi, 2008. "Building Brand Awareness in Dynamic Oligopoly Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 129-138, January.
    17. Yanyan Zheng & Tong Shu & Shouyang Wang & Shou Chen & Kin Keung Lai & Lu Gan, 2018. "Analysis of product return rate and price competition in two supply chains," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 469-496, July.
    18. Mingwen Yang & Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng & Vijay Mookerjee, 2021. "The Race for Online Reputation: Implications for Platforms, Firms, and Consumers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1262-1280, December.
    19. Erickson, Gary M., 2009. "An oligopoly model of dynamic advertising competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 374-388, August.
    20. Fruchter, Gila E. & Messinger, Paul R., 2003. "Optimal management of fringe entry over time," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 445-466, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:17:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s12351-016-0226-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.