IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v95y2019i3d10.1007_s11069-018-3491-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian analysis of school bus accidents: a case study of China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiansong Wu

    (China University of Mining & Technology)

  • Weipeng Fang

    (China University of Mining & Technology)

  • Xing Tong

    (China University of Mining & Technology)

  • Shuaiqi Yuan

    (China University of Mining & Technology)

  • Weiqi Guo

    (China University of Mining & Technology)

Abstract

Prevention and control of school bus accidents have been a hot spot topic around the world. The catastrophic accident can result in severe casualties associated with negative social impacts. In this study, a Bayesian network (BN) model is established for school bus accident assessments considering the influential factors including human error, vehicle failure, environmental impacts and management deficiency. The conditional probabilities of a few root nodes are statistically obtained based on school bus accidents that occurred in the past decade in China. The conditional probabilities of other BN nodes are determined by expert knowledge with treatment by the Dempster–Shafer evidence theory. The consequences of different scenarios of school accidents are estimated via changing the state values of some BN nodes. Furthermore, by conducting sensitivity analysis to the proposed BN, it is identified that “overload” is the most influential factor causing a school accident. The results of the proposed model indicate that the integration of Bayesian network and the Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is an effective framework for school bus accident assessment, which could provide more practical analysis for school bus accidents. This study could contribute to providing technical supports for school bus safety particularly in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiansong Wu & Weipeng Fang & Xing Tong & Shuaiqi Yuan & Weiqi Guo, 2019. "Bayesian analysis of school bus accidents: a case study of China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 95(3), pages 463-483, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:95:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-018-3491-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-018-3491-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-018-3491-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-018-3491-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trucco, P. & Cagno, E. & Ruggeri, F. & Grande, O., 2008. "A Bayesian Belief Network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis: A case study in maritime transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(6), pages 845-856.
    2. Matellini, D.B. & Wall, A.D. & Jenkinson, I.D. & Wang, J. & Pritchard, R., 2013. "Modelling dwelling fire development and occupancy escape using Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 75-91.
    3. Bañuls, Victor A. & Turoff, Murray & Hiltz, Starr Roxanne, 2013. "Collaborative scenario modeling in emergency management through cross-impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(9), pages 1756-1774.
    4. Yanwu Li & Guofeng Su & Xiaole Zhang & Shimin Zhang & Hongyong Yuan, 2015. "Analysis of school bus accidents in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(2), pages 723-734, November.
    5. Khakzad, Nima & Landucci, Gabriele & Reniers, Genserik, 2017. "Application of dynamic Bayesian network to performance assessment of fire protection systems during domino effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 232-247.
    6. N. Nirupama & H. Hafezi, 2014. "A short communication on school bus accidents: a review and analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(3), pages 2305-2310, December.
    7. Nordgård, D.E. & Sand, K., 2010. "Application of Bayesian networks for risk analysis of MV air insulated switch operation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(12), pages 1358-1366.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haifeng Bian & Jun Zhang & Ruixue Li & Huanhuan Zhao & Xuexue Wang & Yiping Bai, 2021. "Risk analysis of tripping accidents of power grid caused by typical natural hazards based on FTA-BN model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(3), pages 1771-1795, April.
    2. Guofa Li & Yuan Liao & Qiangqiang Guo & Caixiong Shen & Weijian Lai, 2021. "Traffic Crash Characteristics in Shenzhen, China from 2014 to 2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-24, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Özkan Uğurlu & Serdar Yıldız & Sean Loughney & Jin Wang & Shota Kuntchulia & Irakli Sharabidze, 2020. "Analyzing Collision, Grounding, and Sinking Accidents Occurring in the Black Sea Utilizing HFACS and Bayesian Networks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(12), pages 2610-2638, December.
    2. Baoping Cai & Yonghong Liu & Zengkai Liu & Xiaojie Tian & Yanzhen Zhang & Renjie Ji, 2013. "Application of Bayesian Networks in Quantitative Risk Assessment of Subsea Blowout Preventer Operations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(7), pages 1293-1311, July.
    3. Qi Yuan & Hongqinq Zhu & Xiaolei Zhang & Baozhen Zhang & Xingkai Zhang, 2022. "An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Underground Engineering Fires," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Jiansong Wu & Zhuqiang Hu & Jinyue Chen & Zheng Li, 2018. "Risk Assessment of Underground Subway Stations to Fire Disasters Using Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Wu, Bing & Yip, Tsz Leung & Yan, Xinping & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Review of techniques and challenges of human and organizational factors analysis in maritime transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    6. Yang, Zhisen & Yang, Zaili & Yin, Jingbo, 2018. "Realising advanced risk-based port state control inspection using data-driven Bayesian networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 38-56.
    7. Chen, Chao & Yang, Ming & Reniers, Genserik, 2021. "A dynamic stochastic methodology for quantifying HAZMAT storage resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    8. Yan-Feng Li & Jinhua Mi & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Dynamic fault tree analysis based on continuous-time Bayesian networks under fuzzy numbers," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(6), pages 530-541, December.
    9. Catrinu, M.D. & Nordgård, D.E., 2011. "Integrating risk analysis and multi-criteria decision support under uncertainty in electricity distribution system asset management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 663-670.
    10. Margherita, Alessandro & Elia, Gianluca & Klein, Mark, 2021. "Managing the COVID-19 emergency: A coordination framework to enhance response practices and actions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    11. Afshin Ghahramani & John McLean Bennett & Aram Ali & Kathryn Reardon-Smith & Glenn Dale & Stirling D. Roberton & Steven Raine, 2021. "A Risk-Based Approach to Mine-Site Rehabilitation: Use of Bayesian Belief Network Modelling to Manage Dispersive Soil and Spoil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Qiao, Wanguan, 2021. "Analysis and measurement of multifactor risk in underground coal mine accidents based on coupling theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    13. Sotiralis, P. & Ventikos, N.P. & Hamann, R. & Golyshev, P. & Teixeira, A.P., 2016. "Incorporation of human factors into ship collision risk models focusing on human centred design aspects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 210-227.
    14. Elon Manurung & Effrida Effrida & Andreas James Gondowonto, 2019. "Effect of Financial Performance, Good Corporate Governance and Corporate Size on Corporate Value in Food and Beverages," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 100-105.
    15. Khakzad, Nima, 2021. "Optimal firefighting to prevent domino effects: Methodologies based on dynamic influence diagram and mathematical programming," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    16. Bing Wu & Huibin Tian & Xinping Yan & C. Guedes Soares, 2020. "A probabilistic consequence estimation model for collision accidents in the downstream of Yangtze River using Bayesian Networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 422-436, April.
    17. Kujala, P. & Hänninen, M. & Arola, T. & Ylitalo, J., 2009. "Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(8), pages 1349-1357.
    18. Singh, Kritika & Maiti, J, 2020. "A novel data mining approach for analysis of accident paths and performance assessment of risk control systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    19. Xiaojiao Qiao & Dan Shi, 2019. "Risk Analysis of Emergency Based on Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-10, November.
    20. Khakzad, Nima, 2023. "A methodology based on Dijkstra's algorithm and mathematical programming for optimal evacuation in process plants in the event of major tank fires," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:95:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-018-3491-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.