IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v92y2018i1d10.1007_s11069-018-3194-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Earthquake scenario in a national drill, the case of “Turning Point 6”, 2012, Israel

Author

Listed:
  • T. Levi

    (Geological Survey of Israel)

  • A. Salamon

    (Geological Survey of Israel)

  • D. Bausch

    (Pacific Disaster Center)

  • J. Rozelle

    (Denver Federal Center)

  • A. Cutrell

    (Denver Federal Center)

  • S. Hoyland

    (Geological Survey of Israel)

  • Y. Hamiel

    (Geological Survey of Israel)

  • O. Katz

    (Geological Survey of Israel)

  • R. Calvo

    (Geological Survey of Israel)

  • Z. Gvirtzman

    (Geological Survey of Israel)

  • B. Ackerman

    (Geological Survey of Israel
    Tel Aviv University)

  • I. Gavrieli

    (Geological Survey of Israel)

Abstract

National exercises are an excellent opportunity to practice earthquake preparedness. Such exercises can greatly benefit from productive communication between the civil protection agencies (CPs) and the earth sciences community (SC). The challenge of the scientists in this interaction is to properly formulate their message and convey their perspective in a manner understandable to the responsible emergency agencies. On October 2012, Israel held its first national earthquake emergency exercise (TP6) that examined the response of the country’s systems at large to an Mw ~ 7 earthquake. The exercise greatly benefited from brain storming meetings between the CPs and researchers from the Geological Survey of Israel (GSI) that were held prior to the drill. These helped in choosing the earthquake scenario and establish the concept of the exercise. Geological hazards and damage maps, including numerous discrete events, were prepared in advance with the HAZUS Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation software and were conveyed to the drilled authorities during the exercise. The exercise also benefitted from close collaboration between researchers of FEMA and the GSI. During the drill, the GSI and its relevant scientists practiced the preparation and transfer of the relevant material to the decision makers in “real time.” The drill provided the following lessons: (1) In real time, the damage maps should be delivered by earthquake researchers, thereby helping the CP agencies to grasp the information. (2) Damage maps should be prepared in advance and accessibly stored by the CP agencies for a range of probable scenarios. (3) Damage maps based on dot density that represent number of buildings damaged, number of casualties and weight of debris were found to be the most comprehensible when presenting the scope of the damage. The lessons learned from the collaboration between the CP and SC in TP6 provide an excellent example for optimal planning of national earthquake exercises, thereby helping in minimizing the anticipated impact of destructive earthquakes.

Suggested Citation

  • T. Levi & A. Salamon & D. Bausch & J. Rozelle & A. Cutrell & S. Hoyland & Y. Hamiel & O. Katz & R. Calvo & Z. Gvirtzman & B. Ackerman & I. Gavrieli, 2018. "Earthquake scenario in a national drill, the case of “Turning Point 6”, 2012, Israel," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(1), pages 113-132, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:92:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-018-3194-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-018-3194-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-018-3194-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-018-3194-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O. Katz & P. Reichenbach & F. Guzzetti, 2011. "Rock fall hazard along the railway corridor to Jerusalem, Israel, in the Soreq and Refaim valleys," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 56(3), pages 649-665, March.
    2. Amos Salamon & Oded Katz & Onn Crouvi, 2010. "Zones of required investigation for earthquake-related hazards in Jerusalem," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 53(2), pages 375-406, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. Levi & D. Bausch & O. Katz & J. Rozelle & A. Salamon, 2015. "Insights from Hazus loss estimations in Israel for Dead Sea Transform earthquakes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(1), pages 365-388, January.
    2. Heon-Joon Park & Jeong-Gon Ha & Se-Hyun Kim & Sang-Sun Jo, 2019. "Seismic Performance of Ancient Masonry Structures in Korea Rediscovered in 2016 M 5.8 Gyeongju Earthquake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Runqiu Huang & Jianjun Zhao & Nengpan Ju & Guo Li & Min Lee & Yanrong Li, 2013. "Analysis of an anti-dip landslide triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 68(2), pages 1021-1039, September.
    4. Stav Shapira & Tsafrir Levi & Yaron Bar-Dayan & Limor Aharonson-Daniel, 2018. "The impact of behavior on the risk of injury and death during an earthquake: a simulation-based study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(3), pages 1059-1074, April.
    5. Daniel Felsenstein & Eilat Elbaum & Tsafrir Levi & Ran Calvo, 2021. "Post-processing HAZUS earthquake damage and loss assessments for individual buildings," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 21-45, January.
    6. Motti Zohar & Amos Salamon & Carmit Rapaport, 2023. "How Expert Is the Crowd? Insights into Crowd Opinions on the Severity of Earthquake Damage," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-14, June.
    7. T. Topal & M. Akin & M. Akin, 2012. "Rockfall hazard analysis for an historical Castle in Kastamonu (Turkey)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(2), pages 255-274, June.
    8. Settimio Ferlisi & Leonardo Cascini & Jordi Corominas & Fabio Matano, 2012. "Rockfall risk assessment to persons travelling in vehicles along a road: the case study of the Amalfi coastal road (southern Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(2), pages 691-721, June.
    9. Lukovic Marija & Ziegler Martin & Aaron Jordan & Perras Matthew, 2022. "Rockfall susceptibility and runout in the Valley of the Kings," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(1), pages 451-485, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:92:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-018-3194-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.