IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i11d10.1007_s11069-024-06576-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of cartographic representation on landslide susceptibility models: empirical evidence from a Brazilian UNESCO world heritage site

Author

Listed:
  • Jefferson Alves Araujo Junior

    (Federal University of Ouro Preto)

  • Cesar Falcão Barella

    (Federal University of Ouro Preto)

  • Cahio Guimarães Seabra Eiras

    (Federal University of Ouro Preto)

  • Larissa Flávia Montandon

    (Geological Survey of Brazil)

  • Alberto Fonseca

    (Federal University of Ouro Preto)

Abstract

The influence of cartographic representation of landslides on susceptibility models is well-known but often neglected by academic studies, which rarely explore its practical implications. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by evaluating the impact of different landslide sampling strategies on statistical models of landslide susceptibility in Ouro Preto, a UNESCO World Heritage Site located in South-eastern Brazil. The study’s main objective was to assess how different landslide sampling strategies affected statistical susceptibility models. It adopted an innovative methodological approach that categorized dependent variables between training and test subgroups, adopting both balanced and unbalanced divisions of dependent variables, and focusing on shallow and deep landslides. In addition, the study introduced a systematic and critical approach to cartographic representation, providing valuable insights for future research and practice on landslide susceptibility mapping. Eighteen models were produced using an inventory with 57 historical landslides mapped with an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. The area and volume of these landslides were determined. Three divisions of dependent variables were adopted between training and test subgroups: one balanced division, with large and deep landslides in both subgroups, and two unbalanced divisions, with a predominance of large and deep landslides in the training subgroup or test subgroup. The construction of landslide susceptibility models employed the information value method, validated through success and prediction curves. The results show the significant influence of cartographic representation (point or polygon) on the quality of statistical models and the spatial distribution of susceptibility classes. The polygonal cartographic representation and balanced partition of dependent variables produced the best results. However, it is emphasized that this cartographic representation is not universally optimal in other contexts. The worst result was obtained using a point and random cartographic representation. Overall, findings indicate the need for more accurate landslide inventories and databases, possibly through standards and regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jefferson Alves Araujo Junior & Cesar Falcão Barella & Cahio Guimarães Seabra Eiras & Larissa Flávia Montandon & Alberto Fonseca, 2024. "The influence of cartographic representation on landslide susceptibility models: empirical evidence from a Brazilian UNESCO world heritage site," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(11), pages 9527-9550, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06576-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06576-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06576-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06576-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamid Reza Pourghasemi & Amiya Gayen & Sungjae Park & Chang-Wook Lee & Saro Lee, 2018. "Assessment of Landslide-Prone Areas and Their Zonation Using Logistic Regression, LogitBoost, and NaïveBayes Machine-Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Cahio Guimarães Seabra Eiras & Juliana Ribeiro Gonçalves de Souza & Renata Delicio Andrade de Freitas & César Falcão Barella & Tiago Martins Pereira, 2021. "Discriminant analysis as an efficient method for landslide susceptibility assessment in cities with the scarcity of predisposition data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(2), pages 1427-1442, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanrong Liu & Zhongqiu Meng & Lei Zhu & Di Hu & Handong He, 2023. "Optimizing the Sample Selection of Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Using Information Value Models in the Dabie Mountain Area of Anhui, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Yong Ye & Wei Chen & Guirong Wang & Weifeng Xue, 2022. "Spatial Prediction of the Groundwater Potential Using Remote Sensing Data and Bivariate Statistical-Based Artificial Intelligence Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(14), pages 5461-5494, November.
    3. Manish Singh Rana & Chandan Mahanta, 2023. "Spatial prediction of flash flood susceptible areas using novel ensemble of bivariate statistics and machine learning techniques for ungauged region," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(1), pages 947-969, January.
    4. Heni Masruroh & Soemarno Soemarno & Syahrul Kurniawan & Amin Setyo Leksono, 2023. "A Spatial Model of Landslides with A Micro-Topography and Vegetation Approach for Sustainable Land Management in the Volcanic Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Halil Akinci & Mustafa Zeybek, 2021. "Comparing classical statistic and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping in Ardanuc (Artvin), Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(2), pages 1515-1543, September.
    6. Katleho Makatjane & Ntebogang Moroke, 2021. "Predicting Extreme Daily Regime Shifts in Financial Time Series Exchange/Johannesburg Stock Exchange—All Share Index," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Hyung-Sup Jung & Saro Lee & Biswajeet Pradhan, 2020. "Sustainable Applications of Remote Sensing and Geospatial Information Systems to Earth Observations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-6, March.
    8. Derya Ozturk & Nergiz Uzel-Gunini, 2022. "Investigation of the effects of hybrid modeling approaches, factor standardization, and categorical mapping on the performance of landslide susceptibility mapping in Van, Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 2571-2604, December.
    9. Michele Placido Antonio Gatto & Salvatore Misiano & Lorella Montrasio, 2022. "On the Use of MATLAB to Import and Manipulate Geographic Data: A Tool for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Martin Kuradusenge & Santhi Kumaran & Marco Zennaro, 2020. "Rainfall-Induced Landslide Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: The Case of Ngororero District, Rwanda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06576-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.