Author
Listed:
- Fangtian Liu
(Hebei University of Economics and Business
Hebei Collaborative Innovation Center for Urban-rural Integrated Development
Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Erqi Xu
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Hongqi Zhang
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Abstract
Natural disasters occur frequently worldwide, causing serious harm to people, resources, and the environment. The disaster mitigation capacity is very important in reducing disaster-caused losses and in informing natural disaster prevention and mitigation plans. However, the disaster mitigation capacity frameworks in recent studies are inconsistent and lack the careful consideration of natural disaster occurrence process, and it remains unclear to what extent the model parameters may affect the robustness of assessment results. To solve this problem, with typhoons as an example, an assessment framework of typhoon disaster mitigation capacity (TDMC) based on the entire process of disaster prevention–resistance–rescue was developed in this study. The TDMC framework was applied in Hainan, China, as a case study, and the associated uncertainty was assessed by analyzing indicator selection and weighting and synthesis methods. The TDMC was very high in Haikou and Sanya but very low in Lingao, Ledong, and Dongfang. Iterative sensitivity analysis of the indicators revealed that the removal of different indicators had little effect on the percentage change in average TDMC of Hainan. The sensitive indicators were warning systems, emergency shelters, and insurance, suggesting that specific strategies for those indicators could improve regional TDMC. The assessment results with different indicator weighting and synthesis methods were generally robust, especially in counties with very low or high TDMC. However, the counties with medium TDMC showed higher sensitivity, which led to changes in TDMC indices. Assessments were more sensitive to changes in weighting method than to changes in synthesis method. This study demonstrated the importance of quantifying uncertainties in assessment model parameters to provide credible TDMC information and to further the effective design of disaster prevention and mitigation strategies.
Suggested Citation
Fangtian Liu & Erqi Xu & Hongqi Zhang, 2024.
"Assessing typhoon disaster mitigation capacity and its uncertainty analysis in Hainan, China,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(11), pages 9401-9420, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06509-0
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06509-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06509-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.