IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v86y2023i1d10.1007_s00184-022-00862-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some reliability measures and maintenance policies for a coherent system composed of different types of components

Author

Listed:
  • Maryam Kelkinnama

    (Isfahan University of Technology)

  • Serkan Eryilmaz

    (Atilim University)

Abstract

Consider an n-components coherent system monitored at one or two inspection times, and some information about the system and its components is obtained. Under these conditions, some variants of mean residual lifetimes can be defined. Also, the dual concept of the residual lifetime, i.e., inactivity time is defined for a failed system under different conditions. This article is concerned with the study of mean residual lives and mean inactivity times for a coherent system made of multiple types of dependent components. The dependency structure is modeled by a survival copula. The notion of survival signature is employed to represent the system’s reliability function and subsequently its mean residual lives and mean inactivity times under different events at the monitoring time. These dynamic measures are used frequently to study the reliability characteristics of a system. Also, they provide helpful tools for designing the optimal maintenance policies to preserving the system from sudden and costly failures. Here, we extend some maintenance strategies for a coherent system consists of multiple dependent components. Some illustrative examples are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Maryam Kelkinnama & Serkan Eryilmaz, 2023. "Some reliability measures and maintenance policies for a coherent system composed of different types of components," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 57-82, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:86:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s00184-022-00862-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s00184-022-00862-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00184-022-00862-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00184-022-00862-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zarezadeh, Somayeh & Asadi, Majid, 2019. "Coherent systems subject to multiple shocks with applications to preventative maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 124-132.
    2. Behrensdorf, Jasper & Regenhardt, Tobias-Emanuel & Broggi, Matteo & Beer, Michael, 2021. "Numerically efficient computation of the survival signature for the reliability analysis of large networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. S. Goli & M. Asadi, 2017. "A study on the conditional inactivity time of coherent systems," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 227-241, February.
    4. Sareh Goli, 2019. "On the conditional residual lifetime of coherent systems under double regularly checking," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(4), pages 352-363, June.
    5. Reed, Sean & Löfstrand, Magnus & Andrews, John, 2019. "An efficient algorithm for computing exact system and survival signatures of K-terminal network reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 429-439.
    6. Xiaoliang Ling & Ping Li, 2013. "Stochastic comparisons for the number of working components of a system in random environment," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 76(8), pages 1017-1030, November.
    7. Jorge Navarro & Camilla Calì, 2019. "Inactivity times of coherent systems with dependent components under periodical inspections," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 871-892, May.
    8. Jorge Navarro & Maria Longobardi & Franco Pellerey, 2017. "Comparison results for inactivity times of k-out-of-n and general coherent systems with dependent components," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(4), pages 822-846, December.
    9. M. Poursaeed, 2010. "A note on the mean past and the mean residual life of a (n − k + 1)-out-of-n system under multi monitoring," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 409-419, June.
    10. Serkan Eryilmaz, 2015. "Systems composed of two types of nonidentical and dependent components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(5), pages 388-394, August.
    11. Parvardeh, A. & Balakrishnan, N., 2013. "Conditional residual lifetimes of coherent systems," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(12), pages 2664-2672.
    12. Vimal Vijayan & Sanjay K Chaturvedi, 2021. "Multi-component maintenance grouping optimization based on stochastic dependency," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(2), pages 293-305, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mansour Shrahili & Mohamed Kayid, 2023. "Stochastic Orderings of the Idle Time of Inactive Standby Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Jia, Xujie & Shen, Jingyuan & Xu, Fanqi & Ma, Ruihong & Song, Xueying, 2019. "Modular decomposition signature for systems with sequential failure effect," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 435-444.
    3. Sareh Goli, 2019. "On the conditional residual lifetime of coherent systems under double regularly checking," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(4), pages 352-363, June.
    4. Rusnak, Patrik & Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Bolvashenkov, Igor & Kammermann, Jörg, 2024. "Importance analysis of a system based on survival signature by structural importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Krzysztof Jasiński, 2021. "The number of failed components in a coherent working system when the lifetimes are discretely distributed," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(7), pages 1081-1094, October.
    6. Jorge Navarro & Camilla Calì & Maria Longobardi & Fabrizio Durante, 2022. "Distortion representations of multivariate distributions," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(4), pages 925-954, October.
    7. Serkan Eryilmaz & G. Tutuncu, 2015. "Relative behavior of a coherent system with respect to another coherent system," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 519-529, May.
    8. Zhengcheng Zhang & N. Balakrishnan, 2016. "Representations of the inactivity time for coherent systems with heterogeneous components and some ordered properties," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 113-126, January.
    9. Monfared, M.A.S. & Rezazadeh, Masoumeh & Alipour, Zohreh, 2022. "Road networks reliability estimations and optimizations: A Bi-directional bottom-up, top-down approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    10. Di Maio, Francesco & Pettorossi, Chiara & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Entropy-driven Monte Carlo simulation method for approximating the survival signature of complex infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    11. Shi, Yan & Behrensdorf, Jasper & Zhou, Jiayan & Hu, Yue & Broggi, Matteo & Beer, Michael, 2024. "Network reliability analysis through survival signature and machine learning techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    12. S. Goli & M. Asadi, 2017. "A study on the conditional inactivity time of coherent systems," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 227-241, February.
    13. repec:bpj:demode:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:156-177:n:10 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Ernesto Veres-Ferrer & Jose Pavía, 2014. "On the relationship between the reversed hazard rate and elasticity," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 275-284, May.
    15. Wang, Shuang & Jia, Haiying & Lu, Jing & Yang, Dong, 2023. "Crude oil transportation route choices: A connectivity reliability-based approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    16. Serkan Eryilmaz & Frank P.A. Coolen & Tahani Coolen‐Maturi, 2018. "Mean residual life of coherent systems consisting of multiple types of dependent components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(1), pages 86-97, February.
    17. Jorge Navarro & Yolanda Águila, 2017. "Stochastic comparisons of distorted distributions, coherent systems and mixtures with ordered components," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(6), pages 627-648, November.
    18. Wang, Xiaoyue & Ning, Ru & Zhao, Xian & Zhou, Jian, 2022. "Reliability analyses of k-out-of-n: F capability-balanced systems in a multi-source shock environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    19. Du, Yi-Mu & Sun, C.P., 2022. "A novel interpretable model of bathtub hazard rate based on system hierarchy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    20. Zhouxia Guo & Jiandong Zhang & Rongfang Yan, 2020. "The Residual Lifetime of Surviving Components of Coherent System under Periodical Inspections," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, December.
    21. Francesco Buono & Emilio Santis & Maria Longobardi & Fabio Spizzichino, 2022. "Multivariate Reversed Hazard Rates and Inactivity Times of Systems," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1987-2008, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:86:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s00184-022-00862-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.