IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v62y2015i5p388-394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systems composed of two types of nonidentical and dependent components

Author

Listed:
  • Serkan Eryilmaz

Abstract

A coherent system of order n that consists two different types of dependent components is considered. The lifetimes of the components in each group are assumed to follow an exchangeable joint distribution, and the two random vectors, which represent the lifetimes of the components in each group are also assumed to be dependent. Under this particular form of dependence, all components are assumed to be dependent but they are categorized with respect to their reliability functions. Mixture representation is obtained for the survival function of the system's lifetime. Mixture representations are also obtained for the series and parallel systems consisting of disjoint modules such that all components of Type I are involved in one module (subsystem) and all components of Type II are placed in the other module. The theoretical results are illustrated with examples. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 62: 388–394, 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Serkan Eryilmaz, 2015. "Systems composed of two types of nonidentical and dependent components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(5), pages 388-394, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:62:y:2015:i:5:p:388-394
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21636
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manuel Franco & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan & Debasis Kundu & Juana-María Vivo, 2014. "Generalized mixtures of Weibull components," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(3), pages 515-535, September.
    2. Navarro, Jorge & Ruiz, Jose M. & Sandoval, Carlos J., 2005. "A note on comparisons among coherent systems with dependent components using signatures," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 179-185, April.
    3. Navarro, Jorge & Rychlik, Tomasz, 2007. "Reliability and expectation bounds for coherent systems with exchangeable components," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 102-113, January.
    4. Jorge Navarro & Francisco J. Samaniego & N. Balakrishnan & Debasis Bhattacharya, 2008. "On the application and extension of system signatures in engineering reliability," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(4), pages 313-327, June.
    5. Jorge Navarro & Rafael Rubio, 2011. "A note on necessary and sufficient conditions for ordering properties of coherent systems with exchangeable components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(5), pages 478-489, August.
    6. Francisco J. Samaniego & N. Balakrishnan & Jorge Navarro, 2009. "Dynamic signatures and their use in comparing the reliability of new and used systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(6), pages 577-591, September.
    7. Navarro, Jorge & Pellerey, Franco & Di Crescenzo, Antonio, 2015. "Orderings of coherent systems with randomized dependent components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 127-139.
    8. Francisco J. Samaniego, 2007. "System Signatures and their Applications in Engineering Reliability," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-71797-5, December.
    9. Mahdi Tavangar, 2014. "Some comparisons of residual life of coherent systems with exchangeable components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(7), pages 549-556, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maryam Kelkinnama & Serkan Eryilmaz, 2023. "Some reliability measures and maintenance policies for a coherent system composed of different types of components," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 57-82, January.
    2. Somayeh Ashrafi & Majid Asadi & Jorge Navarro, 2022. "Joint Reliability Function of Coherent Systems with Shared Heterogeneous Components," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1485-1502, September.
    3. Jia, Xujie & Shen, Jingyuan & Xu, Fanqi & Ma, Ruihong & Song, Xueying, 2019. "Modular decomposition signature for systems with sequential failure effect," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 435-444.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Kelkinnama & M. Asadi, 2019. "Stochastic and ageing properties of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 805-821, June.
    2. Zarezadeh, S. & Mohammadi, L. & Balakrishnan, N., 2018. "On the joint signature of several coherent systems with some shared components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1092-1100.
    3. Serkan Eryilmaz & Markos V. Koutras & Ioannis S. Triantafyllou, 2011. "Signature based analysis of m‐Consecutive‐k‐out‐of‐n: F systems with exchangeable components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(4), pages 344-354, June.
    4. Markos V. Koutras & Ioannis S. Triantafyllou & Serkan Eryilmaz, 2016. "Stochastic Comparisons Between Lifetimes of Reliability Systems with Exchangeable Components," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1081-1095, December.
    5. Salehi, Ebrahim & Tavangar, Mahdi, 2019. "Stochastic comparisons on conditional residual lifetime and inactivity time of coherent systems with exchangeable components," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 327-337.
    6. Mahdi Tavangar, 2014. "Some comparisons of residual life of coherent systems with exchangeable components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(7), pages 549-556, October.
    7. Gaofeng Da & Lvyu Xia & Taizhong Hu, 2014. "On Computing Signatures of k-out-of-n Systems Consisting of Modules," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 223-233, March.
    8. Zhengcheng Zhang & N. Balakrishnan, 2016. "Representations of the inactivity time for coherent systems with heterogeneous components and some ordered properties," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 113-126, January.
    9. Jia, Xujie & Shen, Jingyuan & Xu, Fanqi & Ma, Ruihong & Song, Xueying, 2019. "Modular decomposition signature for systems with sequential failure effect," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 435-444.
    10. Sareh Goli, 2019. "On the conditional residual lifetime of coherent systems under double regularly checking," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(4), pages 352-363, June.
    11. Marichal, Jean-Luc & Mathonet, Pierre & Waldhauser, Tamás, 2011. "On signature-based expressions of system reliability," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(10), pages 1410-1416, November.
    12. Hon Ng & Jorge Navarro & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan, 2012. "Parametric inference from system lifetime data under a proportional hazard rate model," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 367-388, April.
    13. Burkschat, M. & Samaniego, F.J., 2018. "Dynamic IFR concepts for coherent systems," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-7.
    14. M. Kelkin Nama & M. Asadi, 2014. "Stochastic Properties of Components in a Used Coherent System," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 675-691, September.
    15. Jorge Navarro, 2016. "Stochastic comparisons of generalized mixtures and coherent systems," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 150-169, March.
    16. A. Toomaj & M. Doostparast, 2016. "On the Kullback Leibler information for mixed systems," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(10), pages 2458-2465, July.
    17. Jorge Navarro & Rafael Rubio, 2011. "A note on necessary and sufficient conditions for ordering properties of coherent systems with exchangeable components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(5), pages 478-489, August.
    18. da Costa Bueno, Vanderlei, 2013. "A multistate monotone system signature," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(11), pages 2583-2591.
    19. Tavangar, Mahdi & Hashemi, Marzieh, 2022. "Reliability and maintenance analysis of coherent systems subject to aging and environmental shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    20. Serkan Eryilmaz & Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh, 2013. "On profust reliability of coherent systems: signature-based expressions," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(2), pages 173-178, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:62:y:2015:i:5:p:388-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.