IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metcap/v14y2012i3d10.1007_s11009-011-9270-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weak Convergence of Marked Empirical Processes for Focused Inference on AR(p) vs AR(p + 1) Stationary Time Series

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandra Cabaña

    (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)

  • Enrique M. Cabaña

    (Universidad de la República)

  • Marco Scavino

    (Universidad de la República)

Abstract

The technique applied by the authors to construct consistent and focused tests of fit for i.i.d. samples and regression models is extended to AR models for stationary time series. This approach leads to construct a consistent goodness-of-fit test for the null hypothesis that a stationary series is governed by an autoregressive model of a given order p. In addition of the consistency, the test is focused to detect efficiently the alternative of an AR(p + 1) model. The basic functional statistic conveying the information provided by the series is the process of accumulated sums of the residuals computed under the model of the null hypothesis of fit, reordered as concomitants of the conveniently delayed process. This process is transformed in order to obtain a new process with the same limiting Gaussian law encountered in earlier applications of the technique. Therefore, a Watson type quadratic statistic computed from this process has the same asymptotic laws under the null hypothesis of fit, and also under the alternatives of focusing, than the test statistics used in those applications. As a consequence, the resulting test has the same desirable performance as the tests previously developed by applying the same kind of transformations of processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandra Cabaña & Enrique M. Cabaña & Marco Scavino, 2012. "Weak Convergence of Marked Empirical Processes for Focused Inference on AR(p) vs AR(p + 1) Stationary Time Series," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 793-810, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:14:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s11009-011-9270-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11009-011-9270-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11009-011-9270-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11009-011-9270-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bai, J., 1994. "Stochastic Equicontinuity and Weak Convergence of Unbounded Sequential Empirical Proceses," Working papers 94-07, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
    2. E ric E ngler & B ent N ielsen, 2009. "The empirical process of autoregressive residuals," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 12(2), pages 367-381, July.
    3. Escanciano, J. Carlos, 2010. "Asymptotic Distribution-Free Diagnostic Tests For Heteroskedastic Time Series Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(3), pages 744-773, June.
    4. Kulperger, R. J., 1985. "On the residuals of autoregressive processes and polynomial regression," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 107-118, December.
    5. Escanciano, J. Carlos, 2007. "Weak convergence of non-stationary multivariate marked processes with applications to martingale testing," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(7), pages 1321-1336, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bent Nielsen & Andrew Whitby, 2015. "A Joint Chow Test for Structural Instability," Econometrics, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 3(1), pages 156, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:14:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s11009-011-9270-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.