IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/lsprsc/v14y2021i3d10.1007_s12076-021-00275-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does religious social capital affect farmland transactions? A spatial autoregressive analysis in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Tsaiyu Chang

    (Surugadai University)

Abstract

This study aims to empirically determine whether social capital affects farmland transactions in Taiwan. It uses a geographic information system to link the village-level data of the largest national farmland survey with the village-level data of religious groups, which are the most widely distributed civil society organizations. The combined data are analyzed using a spatial self-retrogression model. After controlling for farmland spatial adjacency, an increase in social capital brought an increase in the percentage of active leased farmland and a drop in the percentage of fallow farmland. Analysis of the 2015 cross-sectional data revealed that social capital was strongly conducive to the efficient allocation of farmland resources. While belong to irrigation associations can help to allocate farmland resources (as expected), this allocation is more greatly facilitated by the combination of religion and other traditions. Social capital in Taiwan helped to reduce the density of abandoned farmland, especially Daoist temples in religious communities. This study also used panel data to examine changes in within-village farmland tenancy rates. This analysis found that the identified effects of social capital may decline over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsaiyu Chang, 2021. "Does religious social capital affect farmland transactions? A spatial autoregressive analysis in Taiwan," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 223-245, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:lsprsc:v:14:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s12076-021-00275-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12076-021-00275-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12076-021-00275-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12076-021-00275-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ani L. Katchova & Mary Clare Ahearn, 2016. "Dynamics of Farmland Ownership and Leasing: Implications for Young and Beginning Farmers," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 334-350.
    2. Chang, T. & Takahashi, D., 2018. "Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept for Farmland Leasing and Custom Farming in Taiwan," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277426, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Chang, Tsaiyu, 2012. "A Quantitative Analysis of the Farmland Conversion Problem in Taiwan," Journal of Rural Economics, Agricultural Economics Society of Japan, vol. 84(3), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Tan, S. & Liu, B. & Hannaway, D., 2018. "Age, Social Capital, and Herders Grassland Renting Decisions in Inner Mongolia, P.R. China," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277034, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Taylor, Mykel & Featherstone, Allen, 2016. "The Value of Social Capital in Cropland Leasing Relationships," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235975, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Robison, Lindon J. & Myers, Robert J. & Siles, Marcelo E., 1999. "Social Capital, The Terms Of Trade, And The Distribution Of Income," Staff Paper Series 11546, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    7. Brekke, Jon & Tao, Hung-Lin & Raup, Philip M., 1993. "The Minnesota Rural Real Estate Market In 1992," Economic Reports 13010, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    8. Katchova, Ani L. & Ahearn, Mary Clare, 2014. "Farmland Ownership and Leasing: Implications for Young and Beginning Farmers," Staff Papers 184725, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yagi, Hironori & Yoshida, Shingo, 2024. "Persistence of sub-urban agriculture and landowners' behavior in the population declining phase: Case of the preferential tax treatment for rental farmland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chang, Tsaiyu, 2021. "Would Religious Social Capital Affect Farmland Transactions? A Spatial Autoregressive Analysis in Taiwan," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314975, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Sandra Viviana Polanía Reyes, 2005. "Capital Social E Ingreso De Los Hogares Del Sector Urbano En Colombia," Documentos CEDE 2099, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    3. May, Daniel & Arancibia, Sara & Behrendt, Karl & Adams, John, 2019. "Preventing young farmers from leaving the farm: Investigating the effectiveness of the young farmer payment using a behavioural approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 317-327.
    4. Philip Kostov & Myles Patton & Seamus McErlean, 2008. "Nonparametric analysis of the influence of buyers' characteristics and personal relationships on agricultural land prices," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 161-176.
    5. Robert Dinterman & Ani L Katchova, 2020. "Property Tax Incidence on Cropland Cash Rent," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(4), pages 739-758, December.
    6. Ar. R. T. Hidayat & Corinthias P. M. Sianipar & Shizuka Hashimoto & Satoshi Hoshino & Muhammad Dimyati & Ahmad E. Yustika, 2023. "Personal Cognition and Implicit Constructs Affecting Preferential Decisions on Farmland Ownership: Multiple Case Studies in Kediri, East Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Johanna Jauernig & Stephan Brosig & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Profession and residency matter: Farmers' preferences for farmland price regulation in Germany," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 816-834, September.
    8. King, Robert P. & Lohano, Heman D., 2006. "Accuracy of Numerical Solution to Dynamic Programming Models," Staff Papers 14230, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    9. Lars Isenhardt & Stefan Seifert & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Tenant Favoritism and Right of First Refusals in Farmland Auctions: Competition and Price Effects," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 99(2), pages 302-324.
    10. Heman D. Lohano & Robert P. King, 2009. "A Stochastic Dynamic Programming Analysis of Farmland Investment and Financial Management," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 57(4), pages 575-600, December.
    11. Cloete, Kandas & Greyling, Jan & Delport, Marion, 2022. "Strategic perspectives on quitting or remaining in commercial agriculture in South Africa and why it matters," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 61(01), January.
    12. Bauman, Allison & Jablonski, Becca B. R. & Key, Nigel D. & Hadrich, Joleen C., 2022. "Land tenure and profitability outcomes for U.S. beginning farmers and ranchers," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322233, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Lu, Chen-Fu & Cheng, Chia-Yi, 2023. "Does the change of agricultural zoning policy achieve farmland protection in Taiwan?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    14. Keefe O. Keeley & Kevin J. Wolz & Kaitie I. Adams & Jeannine H. Richards & Erin Hannum & Severine von Tscharner Fleming & Stephen J. Ventura, 2019. "Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Aleksandra Figurek & Katerina Morphi & Alkis Thrassou, 2023. "A Sustainable Risk Management Model and Instruments for Young Farmers in EU Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    16. He, Yiming & Collins, Alan R., 2021. "The effect of information structure on farmland contractual choice: toward a revised theory of share tenancy with new evidence from Guangdong, China," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. repec:ags:aaea22:336002 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Alen Mujčinović & Aleksandra Nikolić & Emelj Tuna & Ivana Janeska Stamenkovska & Vesela Radović & Paul Flynn & Veronica McCauley, 2021. "Is It Possible to Tackle Youth Needs with Agricultural and Rural Development Policies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Rudzani Mudzielwana & Paramu Mafongoya & Maxwell Mudhara, 2022. "An Analysis of the Determinants of Irrigation Farmworkers’ Food Security Status: A Case of Tshiombo Irrigation Scheme, South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, July.
    20. Becca B. R. Jablonski & Nigel Key & Joleen Hadrich & Allie Bauman & Sarah Campbell & Dawn Thilmany & Martha Sullins, 2022. "Opportunities to support beginning farmers and ranchers in the 2023 Farm Bill," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 1177-1194, September.
    21. Chang, T. & Takahashi, D., 2018. "Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept for Farmland Leasing and Custom Farming in Taiwan," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277426, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Spatial models; Land use; Panel data; Religion; Social capital;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lsprsc:v:14:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s12076-021-00275-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.