IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v123y2004i2d10.1007_s10957-004-5155-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterizing Nonemptiness and Compactness of the Solution Set of a Convex Vector Optimization Problem with Cone Constraints and Applications

Author

Listed:
  • X. X. Huang

    (Chongqing Normal University)

  • X. Q. Yang

    (Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

  • K. L. Teo

    (Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

Abstract

In this paper, we characterize the nonemptiness and compactness of the set of weakly efficient solutions of a convex vector optimization problem with cone constraints in terms of the level-boundedness of the component functions of the objective on the perturbed sets of the original constraint set. This characterization is then applied to carry out the asymptotic analysis of a class of penalization methods. More specifically, under the assumption of nonemptiness and compactness of the weakly efficient solution set, we prove the existence of a path of weakly efficient solutions to the penalty problem and its convergence to a weakly efficient solution of the original problem. Furthermore, for any efficient point of the original problem, there exists a path of efficient solutions to the penalty problem whose function values (with respect to the objective function of the original problem) converge to this efficient point.

Suggested Citation

  • X. X. Huang & X. Q. Yang & K. L. Teo, 2004. "Characterizing Nonemptiness and Compactness of the Solution Set of a Convex Vector Optimization Problem with Cone Constraints and Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 391-407, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:123:y:2004:i:2:d:10.1007_s10957-004-5155-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-004-5155-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-004-5155-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-004-5155-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Auslender & R. Cominetti & M. Haddou, 1997. "Asymptotic Analysis for Penalty and Barrier Methods in Convex and Linear Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 43-62, February.
    2. S. Deng, 1998. "Characterizations of the Nonemptiness and Compactness of Solution Sets in Convex Vector Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 123-131, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. H. Luo & X. Huang & J. Peng, 2012. "Generalized weak sharp minima in cone-constrained convex optimization with applications," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 807-821, December.
    2. Yarui Duan & Liguo Jiao & Pengcheng Wu & Yuying Zhou, 2022. "Existence of Pareto Solutions for Vector Polynomial Optimization Problems with Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 148-171, October.
    3. S. Deng, 2010. "Boundedness and Nonemptiness of the Efficient Solution Sets in Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 29-42, January.
    4. César Gutiérrez & Rubén López, 2020. "On the Existence of Weak Efficient Solutions of Nonconvex Vector Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 880-902, June.
    5. S. Deng, 2009. "Characterizations of the Nonemptiness and Boundedness of Weakly Efficient Solution Sets of Convex Vector Optimization Problems in Real Reflexive Banach Spaces," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 1-7, January.
    6. Jiang-hua Fan & Yan Jing & Ren-you Zhong, 2015. "Nonemptiness and boundedness of solution sets for vector variational inequalities via topological method," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 181-193, September.
    7. César Gutiérrez & Rubén López & Vicente Novo, 2014. "Existence and Boundedness of Solutions in Infinite-Dimensional Vector Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 515-547, August.
    8. X. Huang & J. Yao, 2013. "Characterizations of the nonemptiness and compactness for solution sets of convex set-valued optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 611-626, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. X. Huang & J. Yao, 2013. "Characterizations of the nonemptiness and compactness for solution sets of convex set-valued optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 611-626, March.
    2. César Gutiérrez & Rubén López & Vicente Novo, 2014. "Existence and Boundedness of Solutions in Infinite-Dimensional Vector Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 515-547, August.
    3. César Gutiérrez & Rubén López, 2020. "On the Existence of Weak Efficient Solutions of Nonconvex Vector Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 880-902, June.
    4. Li-Wen Zhou & Nan-Jing Huang, 2013. "Existence of Solutions for Vector Optimization on Hadamard Manifolds," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 44-53, April.
    5. S. Deng, 2010. "Boundedness and Nonemptiness of the Efficient Solution Sets in Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 29-42, January.
    6. Felipe Alvarez & Miguel Carrasco & Karine Pichard, 2005. "Convergence of a Hybrid Projection-Proximal Point Algorithm Coupled with Approximation Methods in Convex Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 966-984, November.
    7. Jeyakumar, V. & Lee, G.M. & Dinh, N., 2006. "Characterizations of solution sets of convex vector minimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1380-1395, November.
    8. Angelia Nedić & Asuman Ozdaglar, 2008. "Separation of Nonconvex Sets with General Augmenting Functions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 587-605, August.
    9. Ana Maria A. C. Rocha & M. Fernanda P. Costa & Edite M. G. P. Fernandes, 2017. "On a smoothed penalty-based algorithm for global optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 561-585, November.
    10. LA TORRE Davide & CUSANO Claudio & FINI Matteo, 2004. "Characterizations of convex vector functions and optimization," Departmental Working Papers 2004-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    11. V. Jeyakumar & G. M. Lee & N. Dinh, 2004. "Lagrange Multiplier Conditions Characterizing the Optimal Solution Sets of Cone-Constrained Convex Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 83-103, October.
    12. Nicolas Hadjisavvas & Felipe Lara & Juan Enrique Martínez-Legaz, 2019. "A Quasiconvex Asymptotic Function with Applications in Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 170-186, January.
    13. N. J. Huang & J. Li & S. Y. Wu, 2009. "Optimality Conditions for Vector Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 323-342, August.
    14. Mounir Haddou & Patrick Maheux, 2014. "Smoothing Methods for Nonlinear Complementarity Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 711-729, March.
    15. X. X. Huang & X. Q. Yang, 2003. "A Unified Augmented Lagrangian Approach to Duality and Exact Penalization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 533-552, August.
    16. Vu, Duc Thach Son & Ben Gharbia, Ibtihel & Haddou, Mounir & Tran, Quang Huy, 2021. "A new approach for solving nonlinear algebraic systems with complementarity conditions. Application to compositional multiphase equilibrium problems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1243-1274.
    17. Alfred Auslender & Miguel A. Goberna & Marco A. López, 2009. "Penalty and Smoothing Methods for Convex Semi-Infinite Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 303-319, May.
    18. Héctor Ramírez & David Sossa, 2017. "On the Central Paths in Symmetric Cone Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 649-668, February.
    19. Cominetti, Roberto & Dose, Valerio & Scarsini, Marco, 2024. "Monotonicity of equilibria in nonatomic congestion games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 754-766.
    20. Felipe Alvarez & Miguel Carrasco & Thierry Champion, 2012. "Dual Convergence for Penalty Algorithms in Convex Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 388-407, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:123:y:2004:i:2:d:10.1007_s10957-004-5155-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.