IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v34y2023i4d10.1007_s10845-021-01873-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid data augmentation method for combined failure recognition in rotating machines

Author

Listed:
  • Dionísio H. C. S. S. Martins

    (Federal Center for Technological Education of Rio de Janeiro)

  • Amaro A. Lima

    (Federal Center for Technological Education of Rio de Janeiro)

  • Milena F. Pinto

    (Federal Center for Technological Education of Rio de Janeiro)

  • Douglas de O. Hemerly

    (International Business Machines Corporation)

  • Thiago de M. Prego

    (Federal Center for Technological Education of Rio de Janeiro)

  • Fabrício L. e Silva

    (Federal Center for Technological Education of Rio de Janeiro)

  • Luís Tarrataca

    (Federal Center for Technological Education of Rio de Janeiro)

  • Ulisses A. Monteiro

    (Federal University of Rio de Janeiro)

  • Ricardo H. R. Gutiérrez

    (Federal University of Rio de Janeiro)

  • Diego B. Haddad

    (Federal Center for Technological Education of Rio de Janeiro)

Abstract

Rotating machines are frequently subject to a wide range of rough conditions, resulting in mechanical failures and performance degradation. Thus, it is important to apply proper failure detection and recognition techniques, such as machine learning algorithms, to prevent these issues early. In industrial environments, little data exists regarding failure conditions, which hinders the training stage of the classification algorithms responsible for classifying the failures. Therefore, this work proposes a hybrid method of data augmentation to increase the number of minority class instances in order to improve classifier performance. The approach combines the synthetic minority over-sampling and the additive white Gaussian noise techniques to create a set of artificial signals. The results show that the proposal is able to achieve better results than applying those techniques separately and also when using an undersampling strategy. For comparison purposes, four machine learning classification methods were analyzed alongside our data augmentation proposal, namely, support vector machines, K-nearest neighbors, random forest and stacked sparse autoencoder. The proposed hybrid data augmentation method associated with stacked sparse autoencoder outperformed the other models obtaining an accuracy of 100% and a processing time of 0.13 s.

Suggested Citation

  • Dionísio H. C. S. S. Martins & Amaro A. Lima & Milena F. Pinto & Douglas de O. Hemerly & Thiago de M. Prego & Fabrício L. e Silva & Luís Tarrataca & Ulisses A. Monteiro & Ricardo H. R. Gutiérrez & Die, 2023. "Hybrid data augmentation method for combined failure recognition in rotating machines," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1795-1813, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:34:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10845-021-01873-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-021-01873-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-021-01873-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-021-01873-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Jialin Li & Xueyi Li & David He & Yongzhi Qu, 2020. "Unsupervised rotating machinery fault diagnosis method based on integrated SAE–DBN and a binary processor," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 1899-1916, December.
    3. Ridha Ziani & Ahmed Felkaoui & Rabah Zegadi, 2017. "Bearing fault diagnosis using multiclass support vector machines with binary particle swarm optimization and regularized Fisher’s criterion," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 405-417, February.
    4. Xiang Li & Wei Zhang & Qian Ding & Jian-Qiao Sun, 2020. "Intelligent rotating machinery fault diagnosis based on deep learning using data augmentation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 433-452, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vrignat, Pascal & Kratz, Frédéric & Avila, Manuel, 2022. "Sustainable manufacturing, maintenance policies, prognostics and health management: A literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    2. Patrick Zschech & Kai Heinrich & Raphael Bink & Janis S. Neufeld, 2019. "Prognostic Model Development with Missing Labels," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(3), pages 327-343, June.
    3. Hu, Yang & Baraldi, Piero & Di Maio, Francesco & Zio, Enrico, 2015. "A particle filtering and kernel smoothing-based approach for new design component prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 19-31.
    4. Zhang, Jian-Xun & Hu, Chang-Hua & He, Xiao & Si, Xiao-Sheng & Liu, Yang & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2017. "Lifetime prognostics for deteriorating systems with time-varying random jumps," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 338-350.
    5. Miguel A. Rodríguez-López & Luis M. López-González & Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas, 2018. "Methodology for Detecting Malfunctions and Evaluating the Maintenance Effectiveness in Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Using Generic versus Specific Models from SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, March.
    6. KarabaÄŸ, Oktay & Eruguz, Ayse Sena & Basten, Rob, 2020. "Integrated optimization of maintenance interventions and spare part selection for a partially observable multi-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    8. Gupta, Nitin & Misra, Neeraj & Kumar, Somesh, 2015. "Stochastic comparisons of residual lifetimes and inactivity times of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 425-430.
    9. Zhang, Jian-Xun & Si, Xiao-Sheng & Du, Dang-Bo & Hu, Chang-Hua & Hu, Chen, 2020. "A novel iterative approach of lifetime estimation for standby systems with deteriorating spare parts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    10. Jin, Guang & Matthews, David E. & Zhou, Zhongbao, 2013. "A Bayesian framework for on-line degradation assessment and residual life prediction of secondary batteries inspacecraft," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 7-20.
    11. Costa, Nahuel & Sánchez, Luciano, 2022. "Variational encoding approach for interpretable assessment of remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    12. Jianxun Zhang & Xiao He & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Donghua Zhou, 2017. "A Novel Multi-Phase Stochastic Model for Lithium-Ion Batteries’ Degradation with Regeneration Phenomena," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Le Son, Khanh & Fouladirad, Mitra & Barros, Anne & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoît, 2013. "Remaining useful life estimation based on stochastic deterioration models: A comparative study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 165-175.
    14. Barbosa de Santis, Rodrigo & Silveira Gontijo, Tiago & Azevedo Costa, Marcelo, 2021. "Condition-based maintenance in hydroelectric plants: A systematic literature review," MPRA Paper 115912, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Xiaodong Xu & Chuanqiang Yu & Shengjin Tang & Xiaoyan Sun & Xiaosheng Si & Lifeng Wu, 2019. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Wiener Processes with Considering the Relaxation Effect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Zang, Yu & Shangguan, Wei & Cai, Baigen & Wang, Huasheng & Pecht, Michael. G., 2021. "Hybrid remaining useful life prediction method. A case study on railway D-cables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    17. J.P. Sprong & X. Jiang & H. Polinder, 2020. "Deployment of Prognostics to Optimize Aircraft Maintenance – A Literature Review," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 5(4), pages 26-37, May.
    18. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    19. Swapnil K. Gundewar & Prasad V. Kane, 2022. "Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis using supervised learning methods- artificial neural network and discriminant classifier," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(6), pages 2876-2894, December.
    20. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Cha, Ji Hwan & Lee, Hyunju, 2018. "Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 362-372.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:34:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10845-021-01873-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.