IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v30y2019i6d10.1007_s10845-018-1408-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cyber-physical attack taxonomy for production systems: a quality control perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad E. Elhabashy

    (Virginia Tech
    Alexandria University)

  • Lee J. Wells

    (Western Michigan University)

  • Jaime A. Camelio

    (Virginia Tech)

  • William H. Woodall

    (Virginia Tech)

Abstract

With recent advancements in computer and network technologies, cyber-physical systems have become more susceptible to cyber-attacks, with production systems being no exception. Unlike traditional information technology systems, cyber-physical systems are not limited to attacks aimed solely at intellectual property theft, but include attacks that maliciously affect the physical world. In manufacturing, cyber-physical attacks can destroy equipment, force dimensional product changes, or alter a product’s mechanical characteristics. The manufacturing industry often relies on modern quality control (QC) systems to protect against quality losses, such as those that can occur from an attack. However, cyber-physical attacks can still be designed to avoid detection by traditional QC methods, which suggests a strong need for new and more robust QC tools. As a first step toward the development of new QC tools, an attack taxonomy to better understand the relationships between QC systems, manufacturing systems, and cyber-physical attacks is proposed in this paper. The proposed taxonomy is developed from a quality control perspective and accounts for the attacker’s view point through considering four attack design consideration layers, each of which is required to successfully implement an attack. In addition, a detailed example of the proposed taxonomy layers being applied to a realistic production system is included in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad E. Elhabashy & Lee J. Wells & Jaime A. Camelio & William H. Woodall, 2019. "A cyber-physical attack taxonomy for production systems: a quality control perspective," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 2489-2504, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s10845-018-1408-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-018-1408-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-018-1408-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-018-1408-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yampolskiy, Mark & Skjellum, Anthony & Kretzschmar, Michael & Overfelt, Ruel A. & Sloan, Kenneth R. & Yasinsac, Alec, 2016. "Using 3D printers as weapons," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 58-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang Yu & Muhammad Umar & S. Abdul Rehman, 2022. "Adoption of technological innovation and recycling practices in automobile sector: under the Covid-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 298-306, June.
    2. Kendrik Yan Hong Lim & Pai Zheng & Chun-Hsien Chen, 2020. "A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin: techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1313-1337, August.
    3. William Derigent & Olivier Cardin & Damien Trentesaux, 2021. "Industry 4.0: contributions of holonic manufacturing control architectures and future challenges," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1797-1818, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ranabhat, Bikash & Clements, Joseph & Gatlin, Jacob & Hsiao, Kuang-Ting & Yampolskiy, Mark, 2019. "Optimal sabotage attack on composite material parts," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s10845-018-1408-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.