IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v32y2021i1d10.1007_s10845-020-01573-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An improved case based reasoning method and its application in estimation of surface quality toward intelligent machining

Author

Listed:
  • Longhua Xu

    (Shandong University)

  • Chuanzhen Huang

    (Shandong University)

  • Chengwu Li

    (Jinan Power Co. Ltd. of China National Heavy Duty Truck Group Co., Ltd.)

  • Jun Wang

    (The University of New South Wales (UNSW))

  • Hanlian Liu

    (Shandong University)

  • Xiaodan Wang

    (Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University)

Abstract

In the high speed milling process, the accurate predictions of surface roughness and residual stress can avoid the deterioration of machined surface quality. But it’s hard to estimate the surface roughness and residual stress under different tool wear status and cutting parameters. In this work, a novel intelligent reasoning method-improved case based reasoning (ICBR) was proposed to predict the surface roughness and residual stress. The inputs of ICBR are cutting parameters and tool wear status. The corresponding outputs of ICBR are surface roughness and residual stress. In the ICBR, K-nearest neighbor method and artificial neural network (ANN) as case retrieval was introduced to retrieve the K similar cases to the inputs. Through retrieving K similar cases, the Gaussian process regression (GPR) model as case reuse was established to output the surface roughness and residual stress. The vibration particle swarm optimization algorithm is proposed to optimize the ANN and GPR models. The high speed milling experiments of Compacted Graphite Iron was performed to validate the performance of ICBR. The experimental results showed that the cutting speed is the most important factor affecting the surface roughness. The feed rate is the most important factor affecting the residual stress. The ICBR gives the accurate estimation of surface roughness with the Mean Absolute Percentage Error of 11.6%. As for residual stress, the prediction accuracy using ICBR is 87.5%. Compared with Back-Propagation neural network, standard CBR and GPR models, the ICBR has better predictive performance and can be used for estimations of surface roughness and residual stress in the actual machining process.

Suggested Citation

  • Longhua Xu & Chuanzhen Huang & Chengwu Li & Jun Wang & Hanlian Liu & Xiaodan Wang, 2021. "An improved case based reasoning method and its application in estimation of surface quality toward intelligent machining," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 313-327, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01573-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01573-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-020-01573-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-020-01573-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhigang Jiang & Ya Jiang & Yan Wang & Hua Zhang & Huajun Cao & Guangdong Tian, 2019. "A hybrid approach of rough set and case-based reasoning to remanufacturing process planning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 19-32, January.
    2. García Nieto, P.J. & García-Gonzalo, E. & Sánchez Lasheras, F. & de Cos Juez, F.J., 2015. "Hybrid PSO–SVM-based method for forecasting of the remaining useful life for aircraft engines and evaluation of its reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 219-231.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Shuzhi & Zhang, Sixuan & Zhang, Yimin & Gao, Yue, 2020. "Operational reliability evaluation and prediction of rolling bearing based on isometric mapping and NoCuSa-LSSVM," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Pan, Yongjun & Sun, Yu & Li, Zhixiong & Gardoni, Paolo, 2023. "Machine learning approaches to estimate suspension parameters for performance degradation assessment using accurate dynamic simulations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Rui Wang & Xiangyu Guo & Shisheng Zhong & Gaolei Peng & Lin Wang, 2022. "Decision rule mining for machining method chains based on rough set theory," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 799-807, March.
    4. Wenkang Zhang & Yufan Zheng & Rafiq Ahmad, 2023. "The integrated process planning and scheduling of flexible job-shop-type remanufacturing systems using improved artificial bee colony algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(7), pages 2963-2988, October.
    5. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Cao, Yudong & Ding, Yifei & Jia, Minping & Tian, Rushuai, 2021. "A novel temporal convolutional network with residual self-attention mechanism for remaining useful life prediction of rolling bearings," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    7. Wenjie Wang & Guangdong Tian & Gang Yuan & Duc Truong Pham, 2023. "Energy-time tradeoffs for remanufacturing system scheduling using an invasive weed optimization algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1065-1083, March.
    8. Chao Ke & Xiuyan Pan & Pan Wan & Zixi Huang & Zhigang Jiang, 2023. "An Intelligent Redesign Method for Used Products Based on Digital Twin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Mariusz Zieja & Andrzej Gębura & Andrzej Szelmanowski & Bartłomiej Główczyk, 2021. "Non-Invasive Monitoring of the Technical Condition of Power Units Using the FAM-C and FDM-A Electrical Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Jiyoung Jung & Kundo Park & Byungjin Cho & Jinkyoo Park & Seunghwa Ryu, 2023. "Optimization of injection molding process using multi-objective bayesian optimization and constrained generative inverse design networks," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(8), pages 3623-3636, December.
    11. Qihao Liu & Xinyu Li & Liang Gao, 2021. "Mathematical modeling and a hybrid evolutionary algorithm for process planning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 781-797, March.
    12. Wojciech Wawrzyński & Mariusz Zieja & Justyna Tomaszewska & Mariusz Michalski, 2021. "Reliability Assessment of Aircraft Commutators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Yanbin Du & Guohua He & Bo Li & Zhijie Zhou & Guoao Wu, 2022. "In-service machine tool remanufacturing: a sustainable resource-saving and high-valued recovery approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1335-1358, January.
    14. Zhengyang Fan & Wanru Li & Kuo-Chu Chang, 2023. "A Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Autoencoder Transformer for Remaining Useful Life Estimation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Xu, Dongxin & Pan, Yongjun & Zhang, Xiaoxi & Dai, Wei & Liu, Binghe & Shuai, Qi, 2024. "Data-driven modelling and evaluation of a battery-pack system’s mechanical safety against bottom cone impact," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    16. Mohammad Reza Khosravani & Sara Nasiri, 2020. "Injection molding manufacturing process: review of case-based reasoning applications," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 847-864, April.
    17. Ping Liu & Mengchu Xie & Jing Bian & Huishan Li & Liangliang Song, 2020. "A Hybrid PSO–SVM Model Based on Safety Risk Prediction for the Design Process in Metro Station Construction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Guishuang Tian & Shaoping Wang & Jian Shi & Yajing Qiao, 2022. "State Estimation and Remaining Useful Life Prediction of PMSTM Based on a Combination of SIR and HSMM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Taosheng Wang & Hongyan Zuo & C. H. Wu & B. Hu, 2021. "Combined soft measurement on key indicator parameters of new competitive advantages for China's export," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Yu Mo & Qianhui Wu & Xiu Li & Biqing Huang, 2021. "Remaining useful life estimation via transformer encoder enhanced by a gated convolutional unit," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1997-2006, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01573-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.