IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v29y2018i7d10.1007_s10845-016-1194-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manifold learning based rescheduling decision mechanism for recessive disturbances in RFID-driven job shops

Author

Listed:
  • Chuang Wang

    (Xi’an Jiaotong University)

  • Pingyu Jiang

    (Xi’an Jiaotong University)

Abstract

In actual manufacturing processes, some unexpected disturbances, called as recessive disturbances (e.g., job set-up time variation and arrival time deviation), would gradually make the original production schedule obsolete. It is hard for production managers to perceive their presences. Thus, the impact of recessive disturbances can not be eliminated by rescheduling in time. On account of this, a rescheduling decision mechanism for recessive disturbances in RFID-driven job shops is proposed in this article, and a manifold learning method, which reduces the response time of manufacturing system, is applied in the mechanism to preprocess manufacturing data. The rescheduling decision mechanism is expected to answer the questions of whether to reschedule, when to reschedule, and which rescheduling method to be used. Firstly, RFID devices acquire the actual process completion time of all work in process (WIPs) at every WIP machining process completion time. Secondly, recessive disturbances are quantified to time accumulation error (TAE) which represents the difference between actual process completion time and planned process completion time. Lastly, according to the TAE and production managers’ experience, the rescheduling decision mechanism selects a proper rescheduling method to update or repair the original production schedule. The realization algorithms of rescheduling decision mechanism includes: (1) supervised locally linear embedding. (2) General regression neural network. (3) Least square-support vector Machine. Finally, a numerical experiment is used to demonstrate the implementation procedures of the rescheduling decision mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuang Wang & Pingyu Jiang, 2018. "Manifold learning based rescheduling decision mechanism for recessive disturbances in RFID-driven job shops," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 1485-1500, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-016-1194-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-016-1194-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-016-1194-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-016-1194-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akturk, M. Selim & Gorgulu, Elif, 1999. "Match-up scheduling under a machine breakdown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 81-97, January.
    2. Sabuncuoglu, I. & Bayiz, M., 2000. "Analysis of reactive scheduling problems in a job shop environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 567-586, November.
    3. Suwa, Haruhiko, 2007. "A new when-to-schedule policy in online scheduling based on cumulative task delays," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(1-2), pages 175-186, October.
    4. Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2005. "Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 289-306, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rami Naimi & Maroua Nouiri & Olivier Cardin, 2021. "A Q-Learning Rescheduling Approach to the Flexible Job Shop Problem Combining Energy and Productivity Objectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-36, November.
    2. Yaliang Wang & Xinyu Fan & Chendi Ni & Kanghong Gao & Shousong Jin, 2023. "Collaborative optimization of workshop layout and scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 43-59, February.
    3. Ming Zhang & Yang Lu & Youxi Hu & Nasser Amaitik & Yuchun Xu, 2022. "Dynamic Scheduling Method for Job-Shop Manufacturing Systems by Deep Reinforcement Learning with Proximal Policy Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. D.-Y. Kim & J.-W. Park & S. Baek & K.-B. Park & H.-R. Kim & J.-I. Park & H.-S. Kim & B.-B. Kim & H.-Y. Oh & K. Namgung & W. Baek, 2020. "A modular factory testbed for the rapid reconfiguration of manufacturing systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 661-680, March.
    5. Juan Pablo Usuga Cadavid & Samir Lamouri & Bernard Grabot & Robert Pellerin & Arnaud Fortin, 2020. "Machine learning applied in production planning and control: a state-of-the-art in the era of industry 4.0," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1531-1558, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jürgen Kuster & Dietmar Jannach & Gerhard Friedrich, 2010. "Applying Local Rescheduling in response to schedule disruptions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 265-282, November.
    2. Yi, Xiajie & Goossens, Dries & Nobibon, Fabrice Talla, 2020. "Proactive and reactive strategies for football league timetabling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 772-785.
    3. Aytug, Haldun & Lawley, Mark A. & McKay, Kenneth & Mohan, Shantha & Uzsoy, Reha, 2005. "Executing production schedules in the face of uncertainties: A review and some future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(1), pages 86-110, February.
    4. Carlo Meloni & Marco Pranzo, 2020. "Expected shortfall for the makespan in activity networks under imperfect information," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 668-692, September.
    5. Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2005. "Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 289-306, September.
    6. Qi, Xiangtong & Bard, Jonathan F. & Yu, Gang, 2006. "Disruption management for machine scheduling: The case of SPT schedules," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 166-184, September.
    7. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2015. "Investment, financing and the role of ROA and WACC in value creation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 855-866.
    8. Altekin, F. Tevhide & Bukchin, Yossi, 2022. "A multi-objective optimization approach for exploring the cost and makespan trade-off in additive manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 235-253.
    9. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    10. Servranckx, Tom & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2019. "Strategies for project scheduling with alternative subgraphs under uncertainty: similar and dissimilar sets of schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 38-53.
    11. Nicolas Zufferey & Olivier Labarthe & David Schindl, 2012. "Heuristics for a project management problem with incompatibility and assignment costs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1231-1252, April.
    12. Bruni, Maria Elena & Hazır, Öncü, 2024. "A risk-averse distributionally robust project scheduling model to address payment delays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(2), pages 398-407.
    13. Morteza Davari & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "The proactive and reactive resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 211-237, April.
    14. Jiewu Leng & Pingyu Jiang, 2019. "Dynamic scheduling in RFID-driven discrete manufacturing system by using multi-layer network metrics as heuristic information," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 979-994, March.
    15. Moukrim, Aziz & Quilliot, Alain & Toussaint, Hélène, 2015. "An effective branch-and-price algorithm for the Preemptive Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem based on minimal Interval Order Enumeration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 360-368.
    16. Lamas, Patricio & Goycoolea, Marcos & Pagnoncelli, Bernardo & Newman, Alexandra, 2024. "A target-time-windows technique for project scheduling under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 792-806.
    17. Ripon K. Chakrabortty & Ruhul A. Sarker & Daryl L. Essam, 2020. "Single mode resource constrained project scheduling with unreliable resources," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1369-1403, September.
    18. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Wang, Xiong & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2022. "Multi-objective competency-based approach to project scheduling and staff assignment: Case study of an internal audit project," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    20. Selcuk Goren & Ihsan Sabuncuoglu & Utku Koc, 2012. "Optimization of schedule stability and efficiency under processing time variability and random machine breakdowns in a job shop environment," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 26-38, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-016-1194-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.