IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v29y2018i1d10.1007_s10845-015-1083-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A genetic algorithm embedded with a concise chromosome representation for distributed and flexible job-shop scheduling problems

Author

Listed:
  • Po-Hsiang Lu

    (National Chiao Tung University)

  • Muh-Cherng Wu

    (National Chiao Tung University)

  • Hao Tan

    (National Chiao Tung University)

  • Yong-Han Peng

    (National Chiao Tung University)

  • Chen-Fu Chen

    (National Chiao Tung University)

Abstract

This paper proposes a genetic algorithm $$GA\_JS$$ G A _ J S for solving distributed and flexible job-shop scheduling (DFJS) problems. A DFJS problem involves three scheduling decisions: (1) job-to-cell assignment, (2) operation-sequencing, and (3) operation-to-machine assignment. Therefore, solving a DFJS problem is essentially a 3-dimensional solution space search problem; each dimension represents a type of decision. The $$GA\_JS$$ G A _ J S algorithm is developed by proposing a new and concise chromosome representation $${\varvec{S}}_{{\varvec{JOB}}}$$ S J O B , which models a 3-dimensional scheduling solution by a 1-dimensional scheme (i.e., a sequence of all jobs to be scheduled). That is, the chromosome space is 1-dimensional (1D) and the solution space is 3-dimensional (3D). In $$GA\_JS$$ G A _ J S , we develop a 1D-to-3D decoding method to convert a 1D chromosome into a 3D solution. In addition, given a 3D solution, we use a refinement method to improve the scheduling performance and subsequently use a 3D-to-1D encoding method to convert the refined 3D solution into a 1D chromosome. The 1D-to-3D decoding method is designed to obtain a “good” 3D solution which tends to be load-balanced. In contrast, the refinement and 3D-to-1D encoding methods of a 3D solution provides a novel way (rather than by genetic operators) to generate new chromosomes, which are herein called shadow chromosomes. Numerical experiments indicate that $$GA\_JS$$ G A _ J S outperforms the IGA developed by De Giovanni and Pezzella (Eur J Oper Res 200:395–408, 2010), which is the up-to-date best-performing genetic algorithm in solving DFJS problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Po-Hsiang Lu & Muh-Cherng Wu & Hao Tan & Yong-Han Peng & Chen-Fu Chen, 2018. "A genetic algorithm embedded with a concise chromosome representation for distributed and flexible job-shop scheduling problems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 19-34, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1083-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-015-1083-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-015-1083-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-015-1083-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kacem, Imed & Hammadi, Slim & Borne, Pierre, 2002. "Pareto-optimality approach for flexible job-shop scheduling problems: hybridization of evolutionary algorithms and fuzzy logic," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 245-276.
    2. Stéphane Dauzère-Pérès & Jan Paulli, 1997. "An integrated approach for modeling and solving the general multiprocessor job-shop scheduling problem using tabu search," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 70(0), pages 281-306, April.
    3. De Giovanni, L. & Pezzella, F., 2010. "An Improved Genetic Algorithm for the Distributed and Flexible Job-shop Scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 395-408, January.
    4. M. R. Garey & D. S. Johnson & Ravi Sethi, 1976. "The Complexity of Flowshop and Jobshop Scheduling," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 117-129, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guangchen Wang & Peng Wang & Honggang Zhang, 2024. "A Self-Adaptive Memetic Algorithm for Distributed Job Shop Scheduling Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Guiliang Gong & Raymond Chiong & Qianwang Deng & Qiang Luo, 2020. "A memetic algorithm for multi-objective distributed production scheduling: minimizing the makespan and total energy consumption," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1443-1466, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Xiong & Dongmei Fu, 2018. "A new immune multi-agent system for the flexible job shop scheduling problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 857-873, April.
    2. Nicolás Álvarez-Gil & Rafael Rosillo & David de la Fuente & Raúl Pino, 2021. "A discrete firefly algorithm for solving the flexible job-shop scheduling problem in a make-to-order manufacturing system," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1353-1374, December.
    3. Yiyi Xu & M’hammed Sahnoun & Fouad Ben Abdelaziz & David Baudry, 2022. "A simulated multi-objective model for flexible job shop transportation scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 899-920, April.
    4. Alper Türkyılmaz & Özlem Şenvar & İrem Ünal & Serol Bulkan, 2020. "A research survey: heuristic approaches for solving multi objective flexible job shop problems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 1949-1983, December.
    5. Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Ding, Junwen & Shen, Liji & Tamssaouet, Karim, 2024. "The flexible job shop scheduling problem: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 409-432.
    6. Lunardi, Willian T. & Birgin, Ernesto G. & Ronconi, Débora P. & Voos, Holger, 2021. "Metaheuristics for the online printing shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 419-441.
    7. Shen, Liji & Buscher, Udo, 2012. "Solving the serial batching problem in job shop manufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 14-26.
    8. Rossi, Andrea, 2014. "Flexible job shop scheduling with sequence-dependent setup and transportation times by ant colony with reinforced pheromone relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 253-267.
    9. K. Z. Gao & P. N. Suganthan & Q. K. Pan & T. J. Chua & T. X. Cai & C. S. Chong, 2016. "Discrete harmony search algorithm for flexible job shop scheduling problem with multiple objectives," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 363-374, April.
    10. Guiliang Gong & Raymond Chiong & Qianwang Deng & Qiang Luo, 2020. "A memetic algorithm for multi-objective distributed production scheduling: minimizing the makespan and total energy consumption," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1443-1466, August.
    11. Loukil, Taicir & Teghem, Jacques & Fortemps, Philippe, 2007. "A multi-objective production scheduling case study solved by simulated annealing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 709-722, June.
    12. Julien Autuori & Faicel Hnaien & Farouk Yalaoui, 2016. "A mapping technique for better solution exploration: NSGA-II adaptation," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 89-123, February.
    13. Wang, Sheng-yao & Wang, Ling & Liu, Min & Xu, Ye, 2013. "An effective estimation of distribution algorithm for solving the distributed permutation flow-shop scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 387-396.
    14. De Giovanni, L. & Pezzella, F., 2010. "An Improved Genetic Algorithm for the Distributed and Flexible Job-shop Scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 395-408, January.
    15. Miguel A. Fernández Pérez & Fernanda M. P. Raupp, 2016. "A Newton-based heuristic algorithm for multi-objective flexible job-shop scheduling problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 409-416, April.
    16. Quadt, Daniel & Kuhn, Heinrich, 2007. "A taxonomy of flexible flow line scheduling procedures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(3), pages 686-698, May.
    17. Vilcot, Geoffrey & Billaut, Jean-Charles, 2008. "A tabu search and a genetic algorithm for solving a bicriteria general job shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 398-411, October.
    18. Shen, Liji & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Neufeld, Janis S., 2018. "Solving the flexible job shop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 503-516.
    19. González, Miguel A. & Vela, Camino R. & Varela, Ramiro, 2015. "Scatter search with path relinking for the flexible job shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 35-45.
    20. João M. R. C. Fernandes & Seyed Mahdi Homayouni & Dalila B. M. M. Fontes, 2022. "Energy-Efficient Scheduling in Job Shop Manufacturing Systems: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-34, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1083-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.